Team:Cambridge/Experiments/Initial Exercise Group Alpha

From 2011.igem.org

Revision as of 13:59, 21 September 2011 by Jonathon (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Loading...
OVERVIEW
home

Contents

Fusion of SrfA promoter with GFP

Aim

Our week 1 experimental challenge was to generate a temporal and/or spatial pattern of GFP expression in Bacillus subtilis, using Gibson Assembly to join a sequence of interest to a GFP coding plasmid which we will amplify in E. coli. We chose to visualise sporulation-dependent expression via a fusion of SrfA promoter with GFP.

Role of SrfA

  • SrfA codes for surfactin production, a protein that is produced by B. subtilis prior to sporulation.
  • SrfA is regulated by ComA, a protein which itself responds to an intercellular population-density-signalling molecule, CSF, in a concentration dependent manner.
  • ComA has low activity at low CSF concentration(low population density), highly active as CSF levels increase, and less active at high CSF concentrations.

Construct Design

We wish to:

  • keep the original promotor for SrfA and comA boxes
  • remove GFP promotor sequence
  • maintain ComGA stabiliser sequence
  • do not include restriction sites

Predicted Results

  • In E. coli we do not expect to see any fluorescence, though there is a slight chance that the B. Subtilis promoter we're using will be active to some extent in this species.
  • Bacillus colonies exhibit a range of colony patterns and superimposed on the colony shape we expect a temporal pattern of green fluorescence marking sporulation activity.
  • intially zero or low GFP detection, higher GFP activity on activation of SrfA prior to sporulation.
  • Fluorescence will mark spatially sporulation sites.

Materials

Primer datasheet
  • 20bp primers with 20bp tails were designed to perform PCR to amplify our chosen DNA sequences and Gibson Assembly to fuse the SrfA promoter with a plasmid containing GFP.

We used the 'Finnzymes' melting temperature calculator to work out the melting temperature of the primer part (not the tail) of our Gibson Assembly oligos (this was the 3' 20bp of each oligo) these values in ºC are shown below

JMF1 - 56.91 JMF2 - 68.8 JMF3 - 50.48 JMF4 - 53.09

  • 100 μM stock solutions of the primers were made and subsequently diluted four-fold to make 25μM 'working solutions'
  • Particular care was taken in preparing the initial stock as these affect all future dilutions and were 'contingency' solutions in case of mistake.
  • Genomic DNA of B. subtilis were provided and the vector plasmid pJS104-sfGFP containing the superfolded GFP gene.
  • The two primers for two fragments of the plasmid were provided.

PCR -- taq

Our three PCR reactions consisted of:

1.
1μl primer JMF2
1μl primer JMF3
1μl B. subtilis genomic DNA
2.
1μl primer JMF1
1μl primer A Forward (provided)
1μl vector DNA
3
1μl primer JMF4
1μl primer B reverse (provided)
1μl vector DNA

to each tube we also added:

9.5μl of water
12.5μl Master mix (SyBR Green and Rox, Hotstart Taq polymerase, dNTPs and dyes)

for a total volume 25μl

Results from PCR reaction using taq

The complete tubes were run in a real-time PCR machine for 30 cycles with a 2 minute extension time and a primer annealing temperature of 50ºc. Two of these were successfully copied but one of the plasmid fragments failed. The failure of this largest fragment to amplify was attributed to a too short extension time.

PCR -- Phusion(TM)

We used the same primers and templates as above, but we made a new master mix including phusion, a more processive and higher fidelity polymerase. Each PCR tube contained a total volume 25μl, which was comprised of:

  • 5μl buffer
  • 0.5μl dNTP
  • 0.25μl phusion polymerase
  • 16.25μl H2O
  • 1μl of each primer
  • 1μl of template DNA

We used gel electrophoresis to check the results and isolate our fragments.

Gibson Assembly

In order to combine the fragments of the GFP containing fragment and our chosen sequence of interest (SrfA promoter) we performed Gibson Assembly.

The amplified fragments from the PCR reaction above were added into a PCR tube with a Gibson assembly master mix

Quantity (1μl) Reagent
1μl Amplified SrfA fragment
1μl Amplified Vector fragment 1
1μl Amplified Vector fragment 2
9μl Master Mix


The thermocycler was set at 50 degrees C for 1 hour.

Transformation of E. coli and amplification

Following Gibson Assembly we transformed E.coli with the DNA we had combined. See the protocols page for how to do Transformation of E.coli. We transformed and plated our E. coli on a medium containing ampicillin and left them to incubate overnight. In the morning we observed 5 colonies on our plate.

To our surprise, the E. coli colonies did exhibit fluorescence when viewed under a light microscope - the B. Subtilis promoter has cross-species activity.

E.coli colonies
A single E.coli colony


Digestion with Restriction Enzymes

In order to confirm correct assembly of the plasmid, we performed restriction mapping. At first, we extracted DNA from E.coli colonies that had been grown overnight in liquid medium (we used QIAGEN MiniPrep Kit technique ). The next step involved incubation with KpnI and PstI restriction enzymes, according to the following protocol.

In this experiment we performed digestion of three different samples:

  1. the plasmid with fusion of SrfA promoter with GFP
  2. the positive control plasmid with mRUBY sequence replacing GFP coding sequence
  3. the original pJS104 plasmid

The two restriction enzymes we chose, KpnI and PstI, were predicted to:

  • give products within the 1-3kb range
  • give different patterns for the three DNA samples analysed (so that we would be able to distinguish between the original and modified plasmids).

The predicted restriction maps, prepared using ApE editor, are presented below.

Restriction map of the plasmid with SrfA promoter:GFP fusion
Restriction map of the positive control plasmid with mRUBY sequence
Restriction map of the original pJS104 plasmid


We separated products of digestion by gel electrophoresis (using 1% agarose gel). As we can see in the picture on the left, we did not obtain clear bands. This was most probably caused by poor quality of the gel or unfavourable concentration of the buffer. Additionally, the number of smeared bands and their distribution is not consistent with predictions from ApE, and on some lanes with uncut vectors (e.g. lane 14) we can see several bands of different sizes, although a single band was expected.

picture of an agarose gel with products of restriction enzyme digestion

A table describing the content of each lane (numbered from the left to the right):

Lane 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sample DNA ladder pJS104 plasmid pJS104 plasmid positive control positive control SrfA:GFP fusion A colony SrfA:GFP fusion A colony
uncut cut uncut cut uncut cut
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
SrfA:GFP fusion B colony SrfA:GFP fusion B colony SrfA:GFP fusion C colony SrfA:GFP fusion C colony SrfA:GFP fusion D colony SrfA:GFP fusion D colony SrfA:GFP fusion E colony SrfA:GFP fusion E colony
uncut cut uncut cut uncut cut uncut cut


References

Sporulation occurs late in the life cycle of B. subtilis when the colony reaches a high population density and we hope that GFP could be visualised following overnight growth. This paper[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1178101/?page=2] details some sporulation inducing culture conditions.