Team:Cambridge/Experiments/Thin Films

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Cat (Talk | contribs)
(Created page with "{{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2011_TEMPLATE_HEAD}} We conducted a number of experiments with the thin films, outlined below. ====[[Team:Cambridge/Experiments/Reflectin_Thin_Fil...")
Newer edit →

Revision as of 12:56, 20 September 2011

Loading...
OVERVIEW
home

We conducted a number of experiments with the thin films, outlined below.

Contents

Reflectin Thin Films I

  • Description of the basic method
  • Colourful thin films created with reflectin & HFIP
    • Thin film colour not uniform
  • HFIP thin film control did not show structural colour

Reflectin Thin Films II

  • Method refined in an attempt to reduce impurities
  • Bovine Serum Album (BVA) control to test whether generic proteinacious thin films produce colour
    • Did not show structural colour
  • Reflectin thin films appear to crystalize on drying

Reflectin Thin Films III

  • Control indicates that Urea may be to blame for thin film crystalization
  • More controls show that neither GFP nor BSA exhibit structural colour when spun into thin films

Colour Intense Films - First Breakthrough

  • Less is more - using the same concentration, spinning a small volume leads to better wetting and more colour intense films
  • Introducing the 'Piranha solution' for surface cleaning

Uniform Films

  • Quality over quantity - purer reflectin and greater control over spin lead to colour uniformity

Multilayers

  • Attempts to create multilayers with alternating PDMS and reflectin.
  • Problems with stability of reflectin due to impurities hinder progress

Attempts to increase film stability lead to first multilayer

  • Dilution and centrifuging of samples and using only the very top layer seem to provide better stability for urea containing reflectin
  • Dialysed protein seemed to be more stable however suffers from dewetting