Team:Cambridge/Experiments/Initial Exercise Group control

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Construct Design)
(Digestion with Restriction Enzymes)
 
(22 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
In the positive control experiment we replaced the Green Fluorescent Protein coding sequence in a pJS104 plasmid with a coding sequence for mRUBY, which is a Bright Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein.  
In the positive control experiment we replaced the Green Fluorescent Protein coding sequence in a pJS104 plasmid with a coding sequence for mRUBY, which is a Bright Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein.  
The picture below shows a map of the modified plasmid.  
The picture below shows a map of the modified plasmid.  
-
[[File:cam_plasmid_positivecontrol.jpg | frameless | thumb | 360px | map of the modified plasmid with mRUBY insertion]]
+
[[File:cam_plasmid_positivecontrol.jpg | centre | thumb | 360px | A map of the modified plasmid with mRUBY insertion]]
===Experiment===
===Experiment===
Line 32: Line 32:
* The graph presents accumulation of products with time in real-time PCR:
* The graph presents accumulation of products with time in real-time PCR:
-
[[File:cam_PCR_graph_positive_control.jpg | left | thumb | 400px | progress of PCR reaction]]
+
[[File:cam_PCR_graph_positive_control.jpg | centre | thumb | 400px | Progress of PCR reaction]]
-
 
+
-
<br style="clear:both;"/>
+
====Gel Electrophoresis====
====Gel Electrophoresis====
Line 46: Line 44:
====Transformation of ''E.coli'' Competent Cells====
====Transformation of ''E.coli'' Competent Cells====
-
* We [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Transformation_of_E.Coli | transformed]] competent E.coli cells with products of the Gibson Assembly, and after an overnight incubation at 37°C we examined colonies under the fluorescent microscope. We could see around 20 colonies on the plates, each emitting bright red light.  
+
* We [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Transformation_of_E.Coli | transformed]] competent E.coli cells with products of the Gibson Assembly, and after an overnight incubation at 37°C we examined colonies under fluorescent microscope. We could see around 20 colonies on the plates, each emitting bright red light.
 +
 
 +
[[File:cam_positivecontrolexperiment_redcolonies.jpg | left | thumb | 380px | E.coli colonies viewed under fluorescent miscroscope]]
 +
[[File:cam_positivecontrolexperiment_redcolony.jpg | right | thumb | 380px | A close-up of an E.coli colony]]
 +
 
 +
<br style="clear:both;"/>
====Digestion with Restriction Enzymes====
====Digestion with Restriction Enzymes====
-
In order to further test for the correct assembly, we performed restriction mapping of the plasmid. That involved extraction of DNA from E.coli colonies grown overnight in liquid medium using the [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Mini_Prep |QIAGEN MiniPrep Kit technique]], followed by incubation with KpnI and PstI restriction enzymes. After that, we separated products of digestion by gel electrophoresis (using 1% agarose gel), but most probably due to poor quality of the gel and unfavourable concentration of the buffer used, the results did not match the predicted restriction map (presented below).
+
*In order to further test for the correct assembly, we performed restriction mapping of the plasmid. That involved extraction of DNA from E.coli colonies grown overnight in liquid medium using the [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Mini_Prep |QIAGEN MiniPrep Kit technique]]. After that we incubated extracted DNA with KpnI and PstI restriction enzymes according to the following [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Restriction_Enzyme_Digestion | protocol]]. After that, we separated products of digestion by gel electrophoresis (using 1% agarose gel), but most probably due to poor quality of the gel and unfavourable concentration of the buffer used, the results did not match the predicted restriction map (presented below).
 +
*The experiment is described in greater detail in ''Digestion with Restriction Enzymes'' section of [[Team:Cambridge/Experiments/Initial_Exercise_Group_Alpha | Joe, Matt, Felix and Gerrit write-up]].  
-
[[File:cam_restrictionmap_positivecontrol.jpg | right | thumb | 400px | restriction map of the positive control plasmid]]
+
[[File:cam_restrictionmap_positivecontrol.jpg | centre | thumb | 400px | Restriction map of the positive control plasmid]]
====Transformation of ''Bacillus subtilis'' Competent Cells====   
====Transformation of ''Bacillus subtilis'' Competent Cells====   
-
As a further confirmation of correct assembly of the plasmid, we transfected competent Bacillus cells with purified DNA that had been isolated from E.coli.  
+
*As a further confirmation of correct assembly of the plasmid, we [[Team:Cambridge/Protocols/Transformation_of_B._subtilis | transformed competent Bacillus cells]] with purified DNA that had been isolated from E.coli.
 +
*However, after plating on agar medium with ampicillin and incubating overnight at 37°C, we did not obtain any visible colonies.  
{{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2011_TEMPLATE_FOOT}}
{{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2011_TEMPLATE_FOOT}}

Latest revision as of 11:56, 1 August 2011

Loading...
OVERVIEW
home

Contents

Positive Control Experiment

Construct Design

In the positive control experiment we replaced the Green Fluorescent Protein coding sequence in a pJS104 plasmid with a coding sequence for mRUBY, which is a Bright Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein. The picture below shows a map of the modified plasmid.

A map of the modified plasmid with mRUBY insertion

Experiment

The experiment involved the same steps as preparation and expression of gene fusions of the three teams.

PCR reaction

  • We amplified the mRUBY coding sequence and two arms of the plasmid in a PCR reactions. First, we performed a real-time PCR with Taq polymerase, but as most samples were poorly amplified, we decided to repeat the reaction with Phusion polymerase (protocol)

The three reactions performed ae the following:

Reaction A
1μl primer ruby F (provided)
1μl primer ruby R (provided)
1μl mRuby as a template
Reaction B
1μl primer Vector F (provided)
1μl primer B reverse (provided)
1μl pJS104 plasmid as a template
Reaction C
1μl primer Vector R (provided)
1μl primer A forward (provided)
1μl pJS104 plasmid as a template
  • The graph presents accumulation of products with time in real-time PCR:
Progress of PCR reaction

Gel Electrophoresis

  • Products of PCR reaction with Phusion polymerase were separated on 1% agarose gel according to the protocol. The location of bands corresponded to the rough estimate of predicted sizes of DNA fragments.

Gel Extraction of DNA

  • We followed the protocol to extract and purify DNA.

Gibson Assembly

  • We performed Gibson Assembly in order to obtain a complete plasmid with GFP gene replaced by mRUBY.

Transformation of E.coli Competent Cells

  • We transformed competent E.coli cells with products of the Gibson Assembly, and after an overnight incubation at 37°C we examined colonies under fluorescent microscope. We could see around 20 colonies on the plates, each emitting bright red light.
E.coli colonies viewed under fluorescent miscroscope
A close-up of an E.coli colony


Digestion with Restriction Enzymes

  • In order to further test for the correct assembly, we performed restriction mapping of the plasmid. That involved extraction of DNA from E.coli colonies grown overnight in liquid medium using the QIAGEN MiniPrep Kit technique. After that we incubated extracted DNA with KpnI and PstI restriction enzymes according to the following protocol. After that, we separated products of digestion by gel electrophoresis (using 1% agarose gel), but most probably due to poor quality of the gel and unfavourable concentration of the buffer used, the results did not match the predicted restriction map (presented below).
  • The experiment is described in greater detail in Digestion with Restriction Enzymes section of Joe, Matt, Felix and Gerrit write-up.
Restriction map of the positive control plasmid

Transformation of Bacillus subtilis Competent Cells

  • As a further confirmation of correct assembly of the plasmid, we transformed competent Bacillus cells with purified DNA that had been isolated from E.coli.
  • However, after plating on agar medium with ampicillin and incubating overnight at 37°C, we did not obtain any visible colonies.