"
Team:Cambridge/Team
From 2011.igem.org
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2011_TEMPLATE_HEAD}} | {{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2011_TEMPLATE_HEAD}} | ||
| - | Our core team was made of 9 Cambridge University [[Team:Cambridge/Team/Students | undergraduates]] from a wide range of courses. There were 4 biologists, three engineers, one physicist and one mathematician. While every member of the group broadened their knowledge, our different areas of expertise allowed us to simultaneously approach problems from many angles. '''Unless otherwise stated, all work | + | Our core team was made of 9 Cambridge University [[Team:Cambridge/Team/Students | undergraduates]] from a wide range of courses. There were 4 biologists, three engineers, one physicist and one mathematician. While every member of the group broadened their knowledge, our different areas of expertise allowed us to simultaneously approach problems from many angles. '''Unless otherwise stated, all work recorded on the wiki was carried out by us.''' |
We were also aided by a student from the Royal College of Art (RCA) who was able to provide us with a completely different perspective on our work. Her advice and creative input was invaluable to our project. | We were also aided by a student from the Royal College of Art (RCA) who was able to provide us with a completely different perspective on our work. Her advice and creative input was invaluable to our project. | ||
Revision as of 03:16, 22 September 2011
Our core team was made of 9 Cambridge University undergraduates from a wide range of courses. There were 4 biologists, three engineers, one physicist and one mathematician. While every member of the group broadened their knowledge, our different areas of expertise allowed us to simultaneously approach problems from many angles. Unless otherwise stated, all work recorded on the wiki was carried out by us.
We were also aided by a student from the Royal College of Art (RCA) who was able to provide us with a completely different perspective on our work. Her advice and creative input was invaluable to our project.
We were advised by several academics (both from within the university and externally), both professors and PhD students, who provided technical assistance and insight. They all did a fantastic job of providing positive feedback, without guiding the direction of our project.
Work carried out primarily by these advisors is clearly labelled as such. In particular we are grateful to Paul Grant for assistance operating the confocal and for his advice during our microscopy.
With the team's budget especially tight this year due to the increased cost of the competition, our sponsors were invaluable - they contributed the reagents, kits and cash which enabled us to take part.
