Team:UEA-JIC Norwich/Project

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 12:53, 21 September 2011 (view source) Gcn09tmu (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:57, 21 September 2011 (view source) Gcn09tmu (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	<br>		<br>
	We needed a strategy to help us to achieve this and so we decided to use biobricks which could give quick and definitive results, such as GFP. With this approach we could test the biobricks in bacteria before trying to transform them into our plant species. At the same time we could also grow our transformed cultures and increase the amount of plasmid we had. The final step would be to transform our best biobricks into algae and Moss for further characterisation.		We needed a strategy to help us to achieve this and so we decided to use biobricks which could give quick and definitive results, such as GFP. With this approach we could test the biobricks in bacteria before trying to transform them into our plant species. At the same time we could also grow our transformed cultures and increase the amount of plasmid we had. The final step would be to transform our best biobricks into algae and Moss for further characterisation.
-	<br>
-	<br>
-	One of the reasons that we decided to pursue this area of research was due to the increased versatility in eukaryotic modification of proteins. Eukaryotic post-translational modification can be vital for the successful expression of proteins. Post-translational methylation and glycosylation patterns are rarely conserved across species and never across the three Kingdoms of life. Thus, a eukaryotic protein can be produced in a given bacterial species by transferring the gene, but due to aberrant or non-existent methylation and glycosylation, will be unable to conduct the wild type functioning of the protein. Eukaryotic model organisms are therefore vital for reflecting the likely outcomes of intregrating systems composed of genes from an amalgamation of species when expressed in a eukaryotic organism.
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

---

Revision as of 12:57, 21 September 2011

UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA-JOHN INNES CENTRE

• Home
• Team Students | Advisors | Acknowledgements |
• Project Project Overview | Algae | Moss | Methods | Lab Safety | Attributions |
• Results Registry Overview| Data|
• Human Practice Interviews | Outreach | UK Team Meetup | Media | School Work |
• Lab Journal Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | Week 14 | Week 15 |
• Software
• Photo Gallery
• Sponsors

Project Overview

Plants are an extremely versatile form of life and they are essential to the world we know. Plants, should be a major focus for synthetic biology due to their potential use in an array of applications from food security to the synthesis of biofuels. However the short time scale of the iGEM competition has often meant that there have been very few in previous years. There are also a great many challenges to using plants in iGEM including growth time and the complexity associated with adapting synthetic biology approaches for plants. As the first iGEM team at UEA and in co-operation with the JIC, we felt that we could make a significant contribution to plant based synthetic biology. The overall aim of our project is to help develop and where possible pioneer some of the fundamental technologies and methodologies needed to make plant based synthetic biology projects possible. To achieve this we hope to adapt existing synthetic biology approaches which are successful in Escherichia coli for use in plants.

To achieve the aim of our project we decided to work with Physcomitrella patens and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with the intention of establishing these photosynthetic eukaryotes for this and future iGEM competitions. To lay the ground work we planned to generate an array of biobricks including; promoters, terminators and other biobricks with useful properties. We carefully designed our biobricks to utilise antibiotic resistances which could be used in both bacteria and in the selected species.

We needed a strategy to help us to achieve this and so we decided to use biobricks which could give quick and definitive results, such as GFP. With this approach we could test the biobricks in bacteria before trying to transform them into our plant species. At the same time we could also grow our transformed cultures and increase the amount of plasmid we had. The final step would be to transform our best biobricks into algae and Moss for further characterisation.

As a further part of our project, we aimed to create a plasmid which could be used as a standard in synthetic biology which had antibiotic resistance built in and the presence of the biobrick restriction sites. The program ApE (advanced plasmid editor) was used to visualise the plasmid. We used the Ble gene conferring the Bleomycin resistance cassette for the selection marker. This confers resistance to the Bleomycin family of antibiotics (we used phleomycin to select our transformed cells). The Ble gene we used came from the Chlamydomonas Centre (USA) and this gene has been adapted for use in eukaryotic organisms, including the insertion of two introns and the addition of a 5' and 3' untranslated region (UTR).