Team:Amsterdam/Human Outreach/Collaboration/Kick-off

Revision as of 11:45, 5 September 2011 by SandraC189 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

• Home
• Team
  • Students
  • Advisors
  • Lab Environment
• Project
  • Description
  • Modules
  • Data Page
  • Safety
  • Applications
  • Attributions
  • Acknowledgements
• BioBricks
  • Overview
  • Basic Parts
  • Composite Parts
• Labwork
  • Notebook
  • Protocols
  • Characterization
  • Data Analysis
• Human Outreach
  • Collaboration
  • Education
  • Media
• Sponsors
  • Companies
  • Help Us

Kick-off meeting with Delft

This year is the first time the universities in Amsterdam send in a team to the competition, meaning we do not have the experiences needed to properly run a team yet. Delft on the other hand already sent a couple of flourishing teams to the competition. Therefore, they know what being in iGEM means. In order to help their new team, the team of Delft 2010 organized a crash course to teach their 2011 team all the tips and tricks needed to be a winning team. Since we did not have any previous teams who could do the same for us, we requested to be present during this day as well.

On the 31st of March, we went to the TU in Delft were we got together with the TU Delft 2011 team. The day consisted of two different parts. In the morning we attended a presentation by a previous iGEM team. In the afternoon we talked with the Delft team of 2011 about both of our projects.

Presentation

Nadine Bongaerts and Eva Brinkman, from TU Delft 2010 gave a presentation about their iGEM team. Delft 2010 had an astounding project, where they created a bacterium that was capable of dissimilating oil particles. They also spend quite some time and energy in their human outreach program. To be short, they were an incredible iGEM team. They took their time to talk to the two teams about how they organized their project and what they have done for their human outreach. During their summer they bumped into a couple of problems that every iGEM teams will collide with at some point during the contest. To be ahead of these problems they warned us for some of these troubles and told us how to fix these problems. For example: They had some trouble with working as a team when you do not appoint certain people to be responsible for certain tasks. We also talked about how the experienced the entire competition and what they have learned from it. After the presentation we had a clearer image of what being in iGEM actually means.

Discussion

In the afternoon we got together with the teammembers and supervisors of both teams and we talked about our experiences so far. How did we start the brainstorming? Where did we find the sponsors to write our letter to? How does Delft arrange their labwork? Both teams come from different backgrounds and consist of very different students. By talking to each other the teams can come to ideas they would not have thought of by themselves, and this definitely happened this day. This discussion led to an interesting exchange of experiences and insights. We feel that both teams exploited the opportunity to learn from each other. The two teams definitely made progress and came up with good ideas on how to finish the different projects.

It was a very interesting and inspiring day.