Team:SouthBend-Mishawaka-HS-2/Safety

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 43: Line 43:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-
<br>
 
-
      </li>
 
     <li><strong>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? </strong>
     <li><strong>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? </strong>
         <ul>
         <ul>
Line 50: Line 48:
             <li> If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country? </li>
             <li> If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country? </li>
         </ul>
         </ul>
-
    </li>
 
<br>
<br>
-
<p>
 
     <li><strong>Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </strong></li>
     <li><strong>Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </strong></li>
<br>
<br>
-
<p>
 

Revision as of 15:45, 22 June 2011

SouthBend-Mishawaka-HS-2 logo.png


Home Team Official Team Profile Project Parts Submitted to the Registry Modeling Notebook Safety Attributions


Safety

To address potential safety issues with our project, we were asked by iGEM to answer the following questions:

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
    • researcher safety,
    • public safety, or
    • environmental safety?


    For the safety of our researchers and others in the lab, all experiments are done on a safe and dedicated lab space. Also all members are required to wear the appropriate safety gear (gloves,eye protection, and lab coats) when experiments are in progress. Since our experiments are being done in this lab area, there is no concern for public safety. Our experiment also does use the environment as a factor but it certainly does not compromise the safety and overall wellness of the environment.

  2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
    • did you document these issues in the Registry?
    • how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
    • How could other teams learn from your experience?



  3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
    • If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
    • If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?


  4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering? </li>
    </ol></td>
<p>