Team:British Columbia/Notebook/Week 10

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 28: Line 28:
[[File:ubcigemvickilb.jpg]]
[[File:ubcigemvickilb.jpg]]
 +
 +
==Characterization: Limonene Synthase==
 +
 +
Daisy has been trying transformations with the limonene synthase. Daisy has done in total 5 transformations and each with some issues.
 +
Transformation 1: Double transformation with pRARE2 and Limonene synthase into BL21
 +
Transformation 2: Limonene synthase into C41 DE3
 +
Transformation 3: Limonene synthase into DH5 alpha
 +
Transformation 4: Limonene synthase into DH5 alpha
 +
 +
Well, one might scoff at this and say - How come after 5 transformations, you still cannot get the expression of limonene synthase?
 +
 +
Let me elaborate, and try not giggle:
 +
Transformation 1: Probably did not work because double transformations have lower efficiency
 +
Transformation 2: Did not let C41 DE3 incubate long enough (only 30 minutes)
 +
Transformation 3: Not sure why it didn't work
 +
Transformation 4: A new batch of competent cells that were made were used, they were not tested. Daisy plated a control (without any plasmid) and colonies grew. This means the competent cells are already ampicillin resistant. The Limonene synthase is on an ampicillin resistant plasmid.
 +
 +
Alina has given Daisy a batch of her DH5 from her own lab to use.
 +
 +
 +
==3-Carene==
 +
Daisy has been trying to PCR out specific bands of her truncated 3-carene synthase. Well - why is she taking on such an incredible task? Because Chris Keeling has mentioned that the truncation before a conserved pair of tandem arginines increases the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, Kcat. What is Kcat? It is the turnover number, how many substrates are converted to product per unit time per unit enzyme. It became quite apparent that if our goal was to increase overall production of monoterpenes, that truncating the 3-carene was necessary.
 +
 +
However, producing this truncated synthase has been a significant challenge. Partly because, as mentioned earlier, the forward primer contains: NotI site, extra sequence for NotI to bind, His tag, and with only about 20 bp of overlapping primers to the 3-carene synthase.
 +
 +
Daisy has been trying different annealing temperatures to see if she can increase the specificity. At 57 degrees, she gets a blurry smudge at the right size. At 58, there is no band at all.
 +
 +
Daisy has consulted Albert, the jedi master, and he suggested running 5 cycles at the 57 to get the initial priming. Then raise the annealing temperature to something along the lines of 75. That way, the specific bands can be produced. Daisy has not yet tried this, but she will try it if this round of ligation does not work.

Revision as of 21:17, 9 August 2011

Team: British Columbia - 2011.igem.org

Week 10: August 7-13

Contents

Lab Meeting - August 8

Today, we mostly discussed fundraising. We came up with a list of potential sponsors; each member is responsible for contacting their assigned sponsor. We need money!

Laura gave a very detailed update on her ideas for human practices, which includes videos, and a presentation at Science World.

Joe is waiting for his primers to come. In the mean time, he is working on this year's iGEM logo on Adobe Illustrator. Living in the most beautiful place on Earth, with trees, mountains and serenity, it is hard not to be inspired by the scenic beauty of British Columbia, Canada. At the same, Joe wants to illustrate the effects of the mountain pine beetle epidemic on our forests, which is fueled by recent global climate changes. Even a beautiful place like this can't escape these changes, showing how our Earth's ecosystems are ultimately linked. Here is what he has so far...

basic iGEM logo
now with trees...
more trees...
with UBC 2011
with mountains...

Please Vote for one of these two:

Image A
Image B

Ubcigemvickilb.jpg

Characterization: Limonene Synthase

Daisy has been trying transformations with the limonene synthase. Daisy has done in total 5 transformations and each with some issues. Transformation 1: Double transformation with pRARE2 and Limonene synthase into BL21 Transformation 2: Limonene synthase into C41 DE3 Transformation 3: Limonene synthase into DH5 alpha Transformation 4: Limonene synthase into DH5 alpha

Well, one might scoff at this and say - How come after 5 transformations, you still cannot get the expression of limonene synthase?

Let me elaborate, and try not giggle: Transformation 1: Probably did not work because double transformations have lower efficiency Transformation 2: Did not let C41 DE3 incubate long enough (only 30 minutes) Transformation 3: Not sure why it didn't work Transformation 4: A new batch of competent cells that were made were used, they were not tested. Daisy plated a control (without any plasmid) and colonies grew. This means the competent cells are already ampicillin resistant. The Limonene synthase is on an ampicillin resistant plasmid.

Alina has given Daisy a batch of her DH5 from her own lab to use.


3-Carene

Daisy has been trying to PCR out specific bands of her truncated 3-carene synthase. Well - why is she taking on such an incredible task? Because Chris Keeling has mentioned that the truncation before a conserved pair of tandem arginines increases the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, Kcat. What is Kcat? It is the turnover number, how many substrates are converted to product per unit time per unit enzyme. It became quite apparent that if our goal was to increase overall production of monoterpenes, that truncating the 3-carene was necessary.

However, producing this truncated synthase has been a significant challenge. Partly because, as mentioned earlier, the forward primer contains: NotI site, extra sequence for NotI to bind, His tag, and with only about 20 bp of overlapping primers to the 3-carene synthase.

Daisy has been trying different annealing temperatures to see if she can increase the specificity. At 57 degrees, she gets a blurry smudge at the right size. At 58, there is no band at all.

Daisy has consulted Albert, the jedi master, and he suggested running 5 cycles at the 57 to get the initial priming. Then raise the annealing temperature to something along the lines of 75. That way, the specific bands can be produced. Daisy has not yet tried this, but she will try it if this round of ligation does not work.


1,8-Cineole

pSB1C3 overnight culture
pSB1C3 in microcentrifuge tubes - miniprep in progress!

Jacob, now armed with what he believes are two versions of fully SDM'd 1,8-cineoles (still no sequencing results), decided to come in on the weekend and use PCR to add restriction sites to the ends of his genes, ligate his genes onto suitable plasmids, and grow these constructs in E. coli. If everything worked perfectly, he could present some satisfying results at the Monday meeting, but nothing ever seems to work perfectly. There were several setbacks.

The PCRs for preparing both synthase genes (pg-tps-cin and pgxe-tps-cin) for biobricks and 415 PAG GPD and GAL (both his-tagged and not) worked well, with the exception of the pg-tps-1,8-cineole for the biobrick. As a side note, Jacob ran duplicates of each reaction, one with 0.5 uL added magnesium per 50 uL reaction, and one without. Only the ones with magnesium showed any product in the resulting gel.

Next came the ligations. Vicki prepared new pSB1C3 due to our previous stocks' odd behaviour (which included empty tubes that seemed to produce ligations and tubes that ran on gels in two pieces without being cut), and cut it with ECORI and PSTI to visualize it on a gel. The gel showed bands at the correct lengths (~1000bp) (Besides, the overnight culture turned pink/red - what else could it be if not pSB1C3 with RFP in it!). Jacob used some of this cut product for the biobrick ligation, along with ECORI and PSTI cut pgxe-tps-cin.

Preparing the ligation products for the yeast shuttle plasmid was a bit harder. The restriction sites added to the end of the synthases were SMAI and NOTI, the former of which only works in NEB buffer 4 at 25°, while the latter only had a 25% effectiveness in NEB buffer 4, and worked best at 37°. Jacob felt there was not enough product for a sequential digest, so he used NEB buffer 4 and let it sit at 25° for an hour then 37° for an hour.

The biobrick was prepared by ligating the pSB1C3 with the synthases using T4 ligase, then transformed. The ligations for the yeast parts would have taken too long, so Jacob waited until the next day for the shuttle vector ligations.

The first biobrick ligation transformations were a failure.

The second biobrick ligation transformations were a success! That is to say, there were colonies, and they were not expressing the RFP protein. Overnight cultures of the three present colonies showed that two had the RFP gene, but one did not.

The eventual transformations of the synthases on 415 PAG GPD and GAL grew colonies, but they are of dubious quality. The plates used supported colonies on the negative control plate, which had only competent cells. This raised the question of whether there was a problem with the plates or the cells themselves, and Jacob is running tests to check.

CPCRs of the 415 GPD and GAL ligation transformants showed that some of the colonies had the synthases, and some did not.