Team:ETH Zurich/Team/Human practices

From 2011.igem.org

Revision as of 13:09, 23 October 2011 by Laurabu (Talk | contribs)

Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload


SmoColi human outreach

Human practice is an important part of iGEM. Synthetic Biology and the idea of a parts registry is not well-established in the general public. It is important to inform people of the potentials, but also the risks of synthetic biology. For our human practice we decided to do several things. On one side we were present with a talk and discussion round at the “CBB come together afternoon” to introduce iGEM to the new master students. On the other side we were present at the Open house day of the department of Bioscience and Engineering (D-BSSE) of the ETHZ to bring SmoColi to public.

7.10.11 CBB Get together afternoon

The CBB Get together afternoon, were new master students, students, alumni and professor of the Computational Biology and Bioinformatic come together and talk about the degree program. Lukas gave a presentation were he introduced iGEM.

22.10.11 D-BSSE Open house

Open house teaser.png

The [http://www.bsse.ethz.ch/events/open_house Open House] day of the D-BSSE of the ETH Zurich is a event where scientists show their research to the public. We were also present at the open house day. We presented a Poster, showed our simulations on a computer and did a survey. We used the opportunity to discuss our project with the Basel public and also with other scientists.

Programm Open House day IGEM.png


Poster and Discussion

ETH Poster.png


Survey

Questions

1. Is your profession related to genetic engineering?

□ Yes □ No

2. Does anyone in your family have anything to do with genetic engineering?

□ Yes □ No

3. How would you evaluate your knowledge of Synthetic Biology on a scale from 1 to 10? (1 - no knowledge, 10 - very good knowledge)

□ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10

4. How high would you evaluate the risks of Synthetic Biology on a scale from 1 to 10? (1 - no risk, 10 - high risk)

□ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10

5. How much trust do you have in the scientists that do Synthetic Biology on a scale from 1 to 10? (1 - no trust at all, 10 - strong trust)

□ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10

6. Do you think that a critical discussion for the “Synthetic Biology” issue is possible with the scientists?

□ Yes □ No □ Partly
Comment:

7. Could you imagine an implementation like SmoColi in your daily life?

□ Yes □ No

8. Do you think it is justifiable that students make genetically modified organisms for a competition like iGEM?

□ Yes □ No

9. Is the conduction of animal experiments for a competition like iGEM justifiable?

□ Yes □ No

10. Can you imagine how the genetically modified organisms could simplify your life?

Results

In order to get a better understanding of how people feel about synthetic biology, we analyzed the data that we collected during the Open House Day. A total of 34 people filled out the survey, ranging from undergraduate and graduate students, scientists to members of the general public.

Figure 1: Percentage of people whose profession is related or not to genetic engineering
Figure 2: Percentage of people who have or don't family members whose profession is related to genetic engineering

The first question evaluated how many of the persons who filled out the survey worked in an area related to genetic engineering. This is an important question because it allows us to see whether we have a specific bias in our survey, since we feel that people who work with genetically modified organisms will tend to be more open to synthetic biology. The results showed that

Figure 1: Exploring the parameter space of TetR production rate
Figure 2: Exploring the parameter space of CI production rate
Figure 1: Exploring the parameter space of TetR production rate
Figure 2: Exploring the parameter space of CI production rate
Figure 1: Exploring the parameter space of TetR production rate
Figure 2: Exploring the parameter space of CI production rate
Figure 1: Exploring the parameter space of TetR production rate