• Home
• Presentation
  • Overview
  • Potential applications
  • Collaborations
  • The team
  • Acknowledgements →
    • Host laboratory
    • Sponsors
• Designs
  • Designs overview & concepts
  • Designs list
• Modeling
  • General overview
  • Modeling results for our designs →
    • The basics
    • Our assumptions
    • T7 polymerase diffusion
    • tRNA diffusion
    • ComK/ComS system
    • Parameters
  • Results of our passive diffusion model
  • Toward assisted diffusion
• Data
• Results
  • Achievements
  • Methodologies →
    • Microscopy
    • Micro-fluidic
    • Integration in B.subtilis
    • Kinetics
  • Parts list
  • Notebook
• Human practice & Safety
  • Human practice
  • Safety
  • Brainstorming
  • Bonus track

Testing nanotubes with T7 RNA polymerase diffusion

Summary

All our experiments followed our microscopy protocol when not specified otherwise.

Design overview

Schematic summary of the T7 diffusion device

All of the parts of the above design have been BioBricked, characterized both in E.coli and B.subtilis, and sent to the registry.

More details on the design are available here.

Emitter construct in E.coli - Receiver construct in B.subtilis (plasmid)

As a control for Coli to Subtillis diffusion we wanted to use E.Coli as an T7 RNA Polymerase emitter and B.Subtillis as theT7 autoloop reciever. Here we can see pictures taken using our classic microscopy protocol.

E.Coli T7 emitter + B.subtilis T7 Autoloop in exponantial phase at 37°C

Coli T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (trans image)	Coli T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (gfp image)
Coli T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 125min at 37°C (trans image)	Coli T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 125min at 37°C (gfp image)

As the pictures show, there is no new highly glowing cell after 125 minutes experimentation.

Emitter & receiver constructs in B.subtilis (receiver in plasmid)

As a first trial we cloned our system into the PHM3 plasmid. This experimentation represents the first Subtillis to Subtillis signal diffusion we clearly designed.

B.Subtillis T7 emitter + B.subtillis T7 Autoloop plasmidic clones in exponantial phase at 37°C

B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (gfp image)
B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (gfp image)

Here also, we can see no obvious increase of fluorescence over time.

Emitter & receiver constructs in B.subtilis (receiver in genome)

We used our microscopy protocol to do this experiment. The emitter strain is a B.subtilis PY9 strain where our emitter construct is integrated in the genome. The receiver strain is a B.subtilis PY9 strain where our T7 autoloop (receiver) construct is integrated in the genome.

We followed our cultures on three microscopic slides: one for the emitter, one for the receiver and one for the mix.

B.Subtillis T7 emitter + B.subtillis Chromosomal T7 Autoloop in exponantial phase at 37°C

B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop at 37°C (gfp image)
B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (gfp image)

Again, we can see no increase of fluorescence in our mix over time.

Using the microfluidic chip (B.subtilis/B.subtilis)

Our microfluidic experiment gave unexepected and encouraging results. We used for this experiment two B.subtilis strains (one emitter, one receiver, both integrated in the genome). Our chromosomal T7 autoloop was brightly activated during this experiment, but only in densely packed mix of emitter and receiver cells. Since it is a complicated experiment, it deserves its own specific page. Find more about this experiment here.

Concentrating the cells more for microscopy (B.subtilis/B.subtilis)

We followed our cultures on three microscopic slides: one for the emitter, one for the receiver and one for the mix. The main difference here is we had the previous results from the microfluidic chip. We know that the chromosomal T7 autoloop can be activated in special conditions. We tried to put the cells in a highly dense pack where such events could happen more often.

B.Subtillis T7 emitter + B.subtillis Chromosomal T7 Autoloop highly concentrated in exponantial phase at 37°C

B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop at 37°C (gfp image)
B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (trans image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (rfp image)	B.Subtillis T7 emiter/ B.Subtillis highly concentrated T7 autoloop after 185min at 37°C (gfp image)

Once again, no increase of fluorescence was observed.

FACS experiments

Receiver cells after 0 min incubation	Emitter cells after 0 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:1 ratio) mix cells after 0 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:5 ratio) mix cells after 0 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (5:1 ratio) mix cells after 0 min incubation
Receiver cells after 40 min incubation	Emitter cells after 0 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:1 ratio) mix cells after 40 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:5 ratio) mix cells after 40 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (5:1 ratio) mix cells after 40 min incubation
Receiver cells after 40 min incubation	Emitter cells after 40 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:1 ratio) mix cells after 90 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (1:5 ratio) mix cells after 90 min incubation	Emitter-Receiver (5:1 ratio) mix cells after 90 min incubation

From this FACS experiments we can see that there no appearance of cells GFP positive cells meaning that there is no T7 polymerase diffusion in these conditions.

Conclusions

During all of our experiments with the T7 polymerase diffusion we did not see any fluorescence increase (in the case of the plasmidic autoloop) nor fluorescence appearance (in the case of the chromosomal autoloop). We put our cells in the same conditions that we used in the successful GFP diffusion experiments as well as some new ones. All these repeated testing with T7 RNA polymerase diffusion design shows no evidence of nanotube existence so far. We are currently continuing our experiments to further explore the system.

Limits

Our plasmidic autoloop is very leaky and it is quite hard to see obvious increase in fluorescence. With even finer tuning of our experimental conditions, we might be able to see better a possible hint of nanotube presence.

Our chromosomal autoloop has not been fully tested yet. We are currently trying to put it in the same cell that the T7 RNA polymerase gene to activate it all the time. The total absence of leakage under the microscope seemed quite suspect at first but we saw that it could be activated in the microfluidic experiment. Further investigation on this matter is under way. We are very excited about this construct because it might allow us to have a high signal-to-noise ratio.

We also need to properly test the T7 RNA polymerase we put in B.subtilis, for instance by putting a plasmidic pT7-GFP construct. However, since it is the same gene as in our pHM3 T7 autoloop, we already have indirect proof of its functionality.