Team:Alberta/HumanPractices/Bioreactor

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 23: Line 23:
<br>
<br>
-
<p>The design process allows one to proceed from the abstract to the qualitative; by nature, it is greatly an iterative processes. As alluded to by Suh et al. (2005), at each step in the design process, new information is generated and it is necessary to evaluate the results in terms of the preceding step. Team Alberta applied these insights and carried out several phases of design that progressively allowed us to engineer a functional apparatus. </p>
+
<p>The design process allows one to proceed from the abstract to the qualitative; by nature, it is greatly an iterative processes. As alluded to by Suh et al. (2005), at each step in the design process, new information is generated and it is necessary to evaluate the results in terms of the preceding step. Team Alberta applied these insights and carried out several phases of design that progressively allowed us to engineer a functional apparatus. </p><br>
-
 
+
-
<br>
+
<p> In the first stage of design, the processes that are required to be carried out with our bioreactor were determined. Through completing a process-flow map, we were able to determine the required order of various processes, their relation to one another, and the required inputs and resultant outputs of each. This allowed our team to visually see progression of the synthesis of our biodiesel. </p>
<p> In the first stage of design, the processes that are required to be carried out with our bioreactor were determined. Through completing a process-flow map, we were able to determine the required order of various processes, their relation to one another, and the required inputs and resultant outputs of each. This allowed our team to visually see progression of the synthesis of our biodiesel. </p>
Line 31: Line 29:
         <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6c/Alberta-Bioreactor_Design_Phase_1.png width=520px>
         <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/6c/Alberta-Bioreactor_Design_Phase_1.png width=520px>
         </center>
         </center>
-
 
-
<br>
 
         <p>We used this map to subsequently determine the components that would be required within our bioreactor to successfully carry out these necessary processes. Efficiency considerations were of most importance throughout this next stage of design. Where possible, we incorporated the reuse of reagents. Moreover, considerations of safe and environmental waste disposal were taken into account. Two subsequent bioreactor designs were completed, the first being representative of our initial sketches incorporating these components while the second makes use industry standard symbols for these parts. </p>
         <p>We used this map to subsequently determine the components that would be required within our bioreactor to successfully carry out these necessary processes. Efficiency considerations were of most importance throughout this next stage of design. Where possible, we incorporated the reuse of reagents. Moreover, considerations of safe and environmental waste disposal were taken into account. Two subsequent bioreactor designs were completed, the first being representative of our initial sketches incorporating these components while the second makes use industry standard symbols for these parts. </p>

Revision as of 06:23, 28 September 2011

HUMAN PRACTICES

Bioreactor Design

At the outset of our project, Team Alberta possessed a vision of communities having the ability to utilize our created fuel for various applications. To make this vision a reality, our team focused much of its efforts on the design of a bioreactor, a self-contained apparatus that would be able to carry out all the processes needed for our fuel’s production. Our bioreactor concept is based on a modular, compact, efficient and safe device, which allows individuals and communities to produce a supply of their own biodiesel using garden wastes, such as grass clippings, as the inputs for production.


The design process allows one to proceed from the abstract to the qualitative; by nature, it is greatly an iterative processes. As alluded to by Suh et al. (2005), at each step in the design process, new information is generated and it is necessary to evaluate the results in terms of the preceding step. Team Alberta applied these insights and carried out several phases of design that progressively allowed us to engineer a functional apparatus.


In the first stage of design, the processes that are required to be carried out with our bioreactor were determined. Through completing a process-flow map, we were able to determine the required order of various processes, their relation to one another, and the required inputs and resultant outputs of each. This allowed our team to visually see progression of the synthesis of our biodiesel.

We used this map to subsequently determine the components that would be required within our bioreactor to successfully carry out these necessary processes. Efficiency considerations were of most importance throughout this next stage of design. Where possible, we incorporated the reuse of reagents. Moreover, considerations of safe and environmental waste disposal were taken into account. Two subsequent bioreactor designs were completed, the first being representative of our initial sketches incorporating these components while the second makes use industry standard symbols for these parts.

I like chicken! I like liver! Meow mix, meow mix, please deliver!

I like chicken! I like liver! Meow mix, meow mix, please deliver!