Team:ETH Zurich/Achievements/Model Results
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Feasibility Analysis) |
(→Process Design) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* It can do so within reasonable channel lengths (several centimeters. | * It can do so within reasonable channel lengths (several centimeters. | ||
* Channel diameter is irrelevant for our system. | * Channel diameter is irrelevant for our system. | ||
- | * As mentioned, we need 44.05 mg/L of input acetaldehyde concentration for the band to appear, 2420 mg/L for it to come to the end of the channel. | + | * As mentioned, for a 5cm long channel, we need 44.05 mg/L of input acetaldehyde concentration for the band to appear, 2420 mg/L for it to come to the end of the channel. |
|} | |} |
Revision as of 02:45, 22 September 2011
Modeling Results |
| ||
By modeling and simulating our system we verified that it can actually be implemented in reality. We checked its feasibility, drew some conclusions and decided on a most suitable channel design. |
Feasibility AnalysisWe verified that our initial idea works and that we can actually get a moving GFP band in the channel responding to different input acetaldehyde concentrations! For a 5cm long channel, in order for our SmoColi bacteria to start reporting the presence of acetaldehyde in the air (when the GFP band appears at the beginning of the channel), the system should be supplied with around 44.05 mg/L of acetaldehyde. In order for the band to be able to form at the very end of the channel, the input acetaldehyde concentration should be 2420 mg/L.
|
Process DesignAfter simulating our system in COMSOL, we came to the following conclusions that helped us designing the channel experimentally:
|