Team:ETH Zurich/Process/Microfluidics
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Final Channel Design) |
(→Microfluidic channel without flow) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:: The Modeling showed that diffusion and degradation of acetaldehyde/ xylene is enough to create a concentration gradient in the tube. Without a flow there is no need for a liquid so we decided to fill the whole channel with agarose and cells likewise we don´t need recycling because AHL can diffuse through the whole channel. | :: The Modeling showed that diffusion and degradation of acetaldehyde/ xylene is enough to create a concentration gradient in the tube. Without a flow there is no need for a liquid so we decided to fill the whole channel with agarose and cells likewise we don´t need recycling because AHL can diffuse through the whole channel. | ||
- | [[File:ChannelPhoto.jpg|400px| | + | {|style="border: none;" align="center" |
- | [[File:ChannelBlank.jpg|400px| | + | |valign="top"|[[File:ChannelPhoto.jpg|400px|center|thumb|'''Experimental setup for SmoColi.''' ]] |
+ | |valign="top"|[[File:ChannelBlank.jpg|400px|center|thumb|'''Experimental setup for SmoColi.''' ]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 00:09, 22 September 2011
Microfluidics |
| ||
We relatively early figured out that we need a some kind of channel to establish the acetaldehyde or xylene gradient needed for SmoColi (see Circuit Design). However, there were several different channel designs possible, and the final design evolved through an iterative series of design steps and design validations. The first designs were validated based on vast simulations, the final design furthermore by biological experiments in the lab (see Systems Validation). |
First Channel DesignsMicrofluidic channel with flow and recycling of the medium
|
Final Channel DesignMicrofluidic channel without flow
|