Team:ETH Zurich/Process/Validation

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→System validation for diffusion)
Line 21: Line 21:
[[File:ETHZ Gradient.png|800px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2: GFP gradient in tube:''' ''E. coli'' with IPTG-inducable GFP were incubated in a tube (2 mm diameter, 7 cm long). GFP expression was assessed under the fluorescent microscope after overnight incubation, with a excitation wavelength of 480 nm and a emission wavelength of 510 nm. The 15 microscope photos were reassembled into one using [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ICE/ the Microsoft Research Image Composite Editor].]]
[[File:ETHZ Gradient.png|800px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2: GFP gradient in tube:''' ''E. coli'' with IPTG-inducable GFP were incubated in a tube (2 mm diameter, 7 cm long). GFP expression was assessed under the fluorescent microscope after overnight incubation, with a excitation wavelength of 480 nm and a emission wavelength of 510 nm. The 15 microscope photos were reassembled into one using [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ICE/ the Microsoft Research Image Composite Editor].]]
-
[[File:Quantification.png|800px|center|thumb|'''Figure 3: Quantification of gradient:''' Quantification of the gradient in Figure 2: The light intensity of the IPTG-induced GFP signal was quantified by a moving 80✗80 moving average. The peak at around 1.2 is due to an air bubble in the channel (see Figure 2).]]
+
[[File:Quantification.png|800px|center|thumb|'''Figure 3: Quantification of gradient:''' Quantification of the gradient in Figure 2: The light intensity of the IPTG-induced GFP signal was quantified by a moving 80×80 moving average. The peak at around 1.2 is due to an air bubble in the channel (see Figure 2).]]

Revision as of 19:00, 21 September 2011

Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload Menu image preload


Systems Validation
Diffusion-only System A
Text goes here

System validation for diffusion

Figure 1: Experimental setup for the diffusion test in agarose filled tubes.

To test if we can create a gradient of a small molecule along our agarose filled tube. We filled a tube (2 mm diameter, 7 cm) long with agarose and E. coli with IPTG-inducible GFP was incubated at 37 °C overnight on end of the tube sticking in 1 ml of 10 mM IPTG solution.


Figure 2: GFP gradient in tube: E. coli with IPTG-inducable GFP were incubated in a tube (2 mm diameter, 7 cm long). GFP expression was assessed under the fluorescent microscope after overnight incubation, with a excitation wavelength of 480 nm and a emission wavelength of 510 nm. The 15 microscope photos were reassembled into one using [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ICE/ the Microsoft Research Image Composite Editor].
Figure 3: Quantification of gradient: Quantification of the gradient in Figure 2: The light intensity of the IPTG-induced GFP signal was quantified by a moving 80×80 moving average. The peak at around 1.2 is due to an air bubble in the channel (see Figure 2).
Retrieved from "http://2011.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Process/Validation"