"
Team:ETH Zurich/Biology/Validation
From 2011.igem.org
(→Experimental setup) |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The system work the following way: A) In normal medium conditions the TetR transcription factor is produced and binds to its cognate promoter, thus inhibiting the expression of ''alcR''. In this case no AlcR is present and GFP is produced. B) Upon addition of increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline, TetR gets released from the promoter and AlcR is produced. The amount of AlcR should increase with increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline. C) By addition of acetaldehyde AlcR binds to the alc-promoter and the GFP response decreases. | The system work the following way: A) In normal medium conditions the TetR transcription factor is produced and binds to its cognate promoter, thus inhibiting the expression of ''alcR''. In this case no AlcR is present and GFP is produced. B) Upon addition of increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline, TetR gets released from the promoter and AlcR is produced. The amount of AlcR should increase with increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline. C) By addition of acetaldehyde AlcR binds to the alc-promoter and the GFP response decreases. | ||
| - | == | + | |
| + | == Experiments and results == | ||
In a first experiment, the ''alc''-promoters were tested by using a non-codon optimized natural variant of ''alcR''. Because of this we tested the compatibility of the codon usage in the variant from ''Aspergillus nidulans'' with the one from ''E. coli''. We received a codon adaptation index (CAI) of 0.7 [[#Ref2|[2]]]. Nevertheless, some rare codons in ''E.coli'' were present in the first 20 amino acids of the gene. After a first experiment without any significant results (data not shown), we therefore optimized the 20 first amino acids of ''alcR'' by PCR and also ordered a fully codon-optimized variant. All of the following experiments were performed with ''alcR'' codon-optimized within the first 20 amino acids. | In a first experiment, the ''alc''-promoters were tested by using a non-codon optimized natural variant of ''alcR''. Because of this we tested the compatibility of the codon usage in the variant from ''Aspergillus nidulans'' with the one from ''E. coli''. We received a codon adaptation index (CAI) of 0.7 [[#Ref2|[2]]]. Nevertheless, some rare codons in ''E.coli'' were present in the first 20 amino acids of the gene. After a first experiment without any significant results (data not shown), we therefore optimized the 20 first amino acids of ''alcR'' by PCR and also ordered a fully codon-optimized variant. All of the following experiments were performed with ''alcR'' codon-optimized within the first 20 amino acids. | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 21 September 2011
| Validation |
| ||||
| Experimental setups... | |||||
AlcR sensorTest system As described in the Smoke detectors section we designed two artificial AlcR-dependent promoters which get repressed upon binding of AlcR to acetaldehyde. For testing of our design we created a system with a superfolded GFP output in order to characterize the gene expression with different levels of AlcR production and acetaldehyde induction. The system work the following way: A) In normal medium conditions the TetR transcription factor is produced and binds to its cognate promoter, thus inhibiting the expression of alcR. In this case no AlcR is present and GFP is produced. B) Upon addition of increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline, TetR gets released from the promoter and AlcR is produced. The amount of AlcR should increase with increasing amounts of anhydrotetracycline. C) By addition of acetaldehyde AlcR binds to the alc-promoter and the GFP response decreases.
Experiments and resultsIn a first experiment, the alc-promoters were tested by using a non-codon optimized natural variant of alcR. Because of this we tested the compatibility of the codon usage in the variant from Aspergillus nidulans with the one from E. coli. We received a codon adaptation index (CAI) of 0.7 [2]. Nevertheless, some rare codons in E.coli were present in the first 20 amino acids of the gene. After a first experiment without any significant results (data not shown), we therefore optimized the 20 first amino acids of alcR by PCR and also ordered a fully codon-optimized variant. All of the following experiments were performed with alcR codon-optimized within the first 20 amino acids.   
 As visible on the two images above, no significant change in GFP fluorescence could be observed neither between different acetaldehyde concentrations nor between different AlcR induction levels. Because of these negative results and the non codon-optimized alcR we performed expression tests for the protein in E. coli strain JM101. In these experiments, gene expression was induced with different amounts of anhydrotetracycline during the exponential growth phase of the bacteria. After cultivation, cells were harvested and lysed either by using a Retsch mill or by lysozyme. After resuspension of the cell extract we performed both SDS-PAGE gels and western blots to check for alcR expression. Buffer was added to the cell debris and heated to 95°C for 10 minutes in order to resolubilize potential inclusion bodies.
|
XylR sensor |
Xylene degradation |
Bandpass |
References[1] [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11550794 Beatrice Felenbok, Michel Flipphi and Igor Nikolaev: Ethanol Catabolism in Aspergillus nidulans: A Model System for Studying Gene Regulation, Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 69: 149-204] |
