Team:ETH Zurich/Achievements/Model Results
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Feasibility Analysis) |
(→Process Design) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
= Process Design = | = Process Design = | ||
+ | After simulating our system, we came to the following conclusions that helped us designing the channel experimentally: | ||
* ''E. coli'' can generate a gradient by degrading a substance replenished by diffusion in an agarose-filled channel. | * ''E. coli'' can generate a gradient by degrading a substance replenished by diffusion in an agarose-filled channel. | ||
* It can do so within a reasonable experimental timeframe (within several hours). | * It can do so within a reasonable experimental timeframe (within several hours). |
Revision as of 00:23, 22 September 2011
Modeling Results |
| ||
By modeling and simulating our system we verified its feasibility and we decided on the channel design. |
Feasibility AnalysisWe verified that our initial idea works and that we can actually get a moving GFP band in the channel responding to different input acetaldehyde concentrations. In order our smoColi bacteria to start reporting acetaldehyde in the air (when GFP band appears at the begining of the channel), system should be supplied with around 44.05 mg/L acetaldehyde. In order for the band to be able to form at the very end of the channel, the input acetaldehyde concentration should be 2420 mg/L. Above this concentration the alarm is turned on and the channel goes red. |
Process DesignAfter simulating our system, we came to the following conclusions that helped us designing the channel experimentally:
|