Team:Edinburgh/Interview Analysis

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 7: Line 7:
<p class="h1">Interview Analysis</p>
<p class="h1">Interview Analysis</p>
-
To be done! Once done, link to this page from the interviews page and the abstract page.
+
During our [[Team:Edinburgh/Interviews | interviews]], a number of themes came up. Some related specifically to our biorefineries project, while others applied to synthetic biology more generally.
 +
 
 +
==Biosafety==
 +
 
 +
===Precautionary Principle===
 +
 
 +
===Regulation===
 +
 
 +
===Accidental Release===
 +
 
 +
===Risk Assessments===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Social justice==
 +
 
 +
===Who benefits?===
 +
 
 +
===Exploitation / sourcing===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Other ethical questions==
 +
 
 +
===Animal suffering===
 +
 
 +
===Biologists aren't ethicists===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Democracy==
 +
 
 +
===Public engagement===
 +
 
 +
===Media interaction===
 +
 
 +
===Patents===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Sustainability==
 +
 
 +
===The insufficiency of SB===
 +
 
 +
 
</div> <!-- /main_body-->
</div> <!-- /main_body-->
<html></div> <!-- /mids --></html>
<html></div> <!-- /mids --></html>

Revision as of 10:43, 15 September 2011

Interview Analysis

During our interviews, a number of themes came up. Some related specifically to our biorefineries project, while others applied to synthetic biology more generally.

Contents

Biosafety

Precautionary Principle

Regulation

Accidental Release

Risk Assessments

Social justice

Who benefits?

Exploitation / sourcing

Other ethical questions

Animal suffering

Biologists aren't ethicists

Democracy

Public engagement

Media interaction

Patents

Sustainability

The insufficiency of SB