Team:Edinburgh/Experiments

Results

Actual results of experiments are placed here.

BioSandwich tests

The BioSandwich system is outlined on its own page. BioSandwich creates parts with homologous ends, but there are a number of ways in which the final assembly could be carried out.

For our tests, we attempted to make a construct containing a Plac-LacZ part, as well as EYFP. BioSandwich inserts short spacers between each part to be assembled. Note that after spacer2 we expect to see some extra bases before we reach the RFC10 suffix. We can call these extra bases the "stuffing". So, the expected sequence is:

Vector -- spacerT7 -- Plac,LacZ -- spacer1 -- EYFP -- spacer2 -- stuffing

Successful assemblies are expected to generate blue colonies that fluoresce yellow under a blue light. We tried several assembly methods, all of which generated many colonies with the correct phenotype, but also many colonies with an incorrect phenotype...

From each plate we sequenced a colony with the correct phenotype (if there were any) and some colonies with incorrect phenotypes, in an attempt to understand what the failure modes were.

BioSandwich with Gibson Assembly

• Colony gby [blue, yellow] - expected scar is missing at approx base 680 of the forward chromatogram. Also, the spacer ends with ATG and the part starts with ATG, but only one ATG is seen. In total 9 bases are missing. There is homology of "tatgg" at both ends of the deleted fragment. There is a point mutation at approx base 500 of the forward chromatogram.
• Colony gb [blue] - there is a deletion of about 80 bases at approx base 700 of the chromatogram. This has been caused by homology of a "gggcgagg" found at both ends of the deleted sequence. The 9 bases mentioned for gby are also missing.
• Colony gwy [yellow] - seems correct except for a point mutation in the reverse chromatogram. The mutation is synonymous (ctg -> ttg). There's no clear reason why the colony wasn't blue.

Lessons learned: bits of homology, even quite small, can cause problems with this method.

BioSandwich with Overlap Extension PCR

[Different primers were used and spacer2 was not needed.]

• Colony bby [blue, yellow] - correct sequence.
• Colony bb [blue] - has a massive deletion (several hundred bases) in the EYFP gene after about 60 bases. There is partial homology between the start and end of the deletion: "tggtcgagctggac" vs "tggacgagctgtac".
• Colony bw [plain] - has spacerT7 joined to spacer1, and the same massive deletion as bb.

Again homology seems to be an issue. Parts joining randomly (in bw) is worrying.

BioSandwich with Ligation Independent Cloning

We got very few colonies with this method; indeed in several attempts we have seen one correct colony.

• Colony b1 [blue, yellow] - sequence read is of low quality but things seem correct.
• Colony y2 [yellow] - appears to simply be <partinfo>BBa_K216011</partinfo>.
• Colony n4 [plain] - sequence is unreadable.

The y2 colony is probably expressing a template for PCR which made it all the way through the various steps that came afterwards.

BioSandwich with Blunt-End Ligation Independent Cloning

This is expected to fail as Ligation Independent Cloning requires long overhangs at the end of each part, not blunt ends. No correct colonies were seen.

• Colony bb1 [blue] - seems to be <partinfo>BBa_J33207</partinfo> followed by part of E. coli ferrous iron transport gene A.
• Colony bw2 [plain] - has spacerT7 followed by the stuffing.
• Colony bw3 [plain] - has RFC10 prefix followed by RFC10 suffix, as if XbaI and SpeI sites have joined in a normal vector.

BioSandwich with CPEC: Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning

• Colony cby [blue, yellow] - there is a single-base deletion near the start of the PlacLacZ part, with no obvious cause. It is too early to affect expression. The last few bases of spacer1 are missing, as well as the first few bases of the EYFP part (9 bases total). This is explained by homology of "tatgg". Otherwise seems correct.
• Colony cb [blue] - Normal until the end of spacer1, which is followed immediately by spacer2 and the stuffing.
• Colony cw [plain] - spacerT7 is followed immediately by a second copy of spacerT7, after which comes spacer2 and a second copy of spacer2. Then the stuffing.

This gave some of the weirder results.

malS

We placed malS (an E. coli amylase gene) under the control of the lac promoter to make part <partinfo>BBa_K523006</partinfo>.

Photo here

INP-EYFP

We made a fusion (<partinfo>BBa_K523013</partinfo>) of Ice Nucleation Protein and Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein, and placed it under the control of the Lac promoter.

Under blue light, the cells fluoresced yellow, as shown on right. Unfortunately, our imaging technology was not capable of showing whether the fluorescence was localised to the outer membrane.