Team:Paris Liliane Bettencourt/Notebook/2011/09/06/

From 2011.igem.org

Revision as of 07:26, 6 September 2011 by Cyrpaut (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Team IGEM Paris 2011

Cyrille

Transformations check

pVeg-YFP in pHM3: Transformation works. About the same ratio in 1:1 and 1:10. A bit less in 1:100.

                  -> Transformation seems clean, control weak but correct
                       -> 10 colonies insulated

TetO-pVeg-YFP in pHM3: Transformation works, a bit less eficiency. It seems clean. (no negative control)

                  -> A bit weaker, control correct
                       -> 10 colonies insulated

YFP TetR BB in pHM3: Negative control very polluted. About 1.3 times the number of colonies in the T1 and very few in the T2. Positive control correct.

                       -> 10 colonies insulated from plate T1

ComS in pSB1C3: Negative control very clean (~20 colonies in the 200µL plate) Very few colonies on the other plates. Seems to have worked best with ratio 1:10-5. Very fw colonies on the other plates

                      -> 10 colonies insulated


Test of new comptetenc cells

Negative control on Ampicylin are clean Negative control (400µL out of 1ml plated)on Cm are a bit polluted. About 30 clones.

Positive control with tube one and two are very good, but they are not red!!! How come?

""To conclude, use the MH1 cells (cap green) for cloning on Cm and Turbo cells to clone on Ampicilyn!!!""