Team:Harvard/Results/Chip Synthesis

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(qPCR curves)
Line 9: Line 9:
'''Based on the graph and gel below, we know we successfully amplified each of our target sub-pools.'''
'''Based on the graph and gel below, we know we successfully amplified each of our target sub-pools.'''
-
[[File:HARVQpcr.png|center|800 px|caption]]
+
[[File:HARVQpcr.png|center|frame|800 px|caption|Because flourescence grows exponentially and just begins to level off at the end of the graph, we know that our sub-pools were amplified at equal rates.]]
 +
 
[[File:HARV2011.8.,17_chip_library_annotatedZOOM.png|center|]]
[[File:HARV2011.8.,17_chip_library_annotatedZOOM.png|center|]]

Revision as of 19:40, 28 September 2011

bar

qPCR curves

Each line on the graph below represents a qPCR for one of our sub-pools (each sequence we are targeting represents a sub-pool: CB top, CB bottom, FH top, FH bottom, Myc 198, Myc 981). By plotting the relative flouresence present in each cycle, we can visualize the pogress of the reaction. When performing a qPCR, one wants to run the reaction while the growth is still exponential. During this phase, all the oligos are replicated at equal rates. Once growth begins leveling off, as it does at the end of the graph below, the reaction should be stopped as the oligos are now being replicated unequally.

Based on the graph and gel below, we know we successfully amplified each of our target sub-pools.

Because flourescence grows exponentially and just begins to level off at the end of the graph, we know that our sub-pools were amplified at equal rates.


HARV2011.8.,17 chip library annotatedZOOM.png

Sequencing results of Library transformation

Error rates

Still being updated

  • Good: 57.8% (22/38)
  • Single SNP: 5.3% (2/38)
  • Multiple SNPs: 18.4% (7/38)
  • Frame shift: 18.4% (7/38)

Distributions

Still being updated Each of the sequenced zinc fingers have original F1 fingers.