Team:UPO-Sevilla/Project/Improving Flip Flop/Proteolysis/Conclusions

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 19: Line 19:
                             <h1>Conclusions</h1>
                             <h1>Conclusions</h1>
                              
                              
-
                             <p>With this proteolysis system we are, as said, degrading the reporter of State 1 (state 1 reporter) and the repressor of State 2 (state 2 repressor) when this second (State) is the dominant. This will allow us both to minimize the residual GFP signal and to enhance PLac expression, as it won’t be repressed. With this mechanism, we intend to shorten switching time between states and to obtain the clearest signal difference.</p>  
+
                             <p>With this proteolysis system we are, as said, <strong>degrading State 1 reporter</strong> and <strong>State 2 repressor</strong> when this second State is the dominant. This will allow us both to <strong>minimize</strong> the <strong>residual GFP signal</strong> and to <strong>enhance PLac expression</strong>, as it won’t be repressed. With this mechanism, we intend to <strong>shorten switching time</strong> between states and to obtain the <strong>clearest signal difference</strong>.</p>  
                         </div>
                         </div>

Revision as of 19:55, 21 September 2011

Grey iGEM Logo UPO icon

Conclusions

With this proteolysis system we are, as said, degrading State 1 reporter and State 2 repressor when this second State is the dominant. This will allow us both to minimize the residual GFP signal and to enhance PLac expression, as it won’t be repressed. With this mechanism, we intend to shorten switching time between states and to obtain the clearest signal difference.