"
Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project
From 2011.igem.org
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<li>The emitter cell has specific promoters that activates an amplification system</li> | <li>The emitter cell has specific promoters that activates an amplification system</li> | ||
<li>This amplification system in turn trigger a detection mechanism we can measure (fluroescence, others)</li></ul> | <li>This amplification system in turn trigger a detection mechanism we can measure (fluroescence, others)</li></ul> | ||
| - | <p>Even though the inter-species (<i>B.subtilis-E.coli</ | + | <p>Even though the inter-species (<i>B.subtilis-E.coli</i>) connection seemed more difficult to reproduce according to the Dubey/Ben-Yehuda paper, we decided to explore it along with the <i>B.subtilis-B.subtilis</i> connection. This was mainly motivated by the overwhelming number of Biobricks available for <i>E.coli</i> when compared to those avalaible for <i>B.subtilis</i>.</p> |
Revision as of 16:02, 5 September 2011
Overview of the project
Mankind is only beginning to grasp the complexity of living organisms. New discoveries often challenge our understanding of life. We believe that synthetic biology can be used as a powerful and reliable tool to help us comprehend and characterize the phenomena we just encountered.
As an iGEM team, we decided to work on one of the most intriguing microbiology discovery of the last decade: the existence of nanotubes communication routes in Bacillus subtilis!
The recent discovery of nanotubes between individual B.subtilis by Dubey and Ben-Yehuda spiked our interest. Through very detailed and advanced microscopy, they showed nanotubes forming between cells and that a wide rande of proteins could pass through this communication channel (GFP, calcein, antibiotics, ...). They also showed signs of communication between B.subtilis and E.Coli, another species entirely. This counter-intuitive communication channel could very well have a tremendous impact on evolution, with two different species sharing proteins and even genetic material.
Summary of the article:
The article published by Dubey and Ben-Yehuda [1] in the Journal Cell is the starting point of our project. In this paper, they show an extraordinary new form of communication between Bacillus subtilis cells and even exchanges with E. coli
List the different molecules and some details on the nanotubes.
The existence of the nanotube network discovered by Dubey and Ben-Yehuda is still discussed. We wanted to use synthetic biology to provide new evidences supporting the existence of a new cell-to-cell communication in Bacillus Subtilis and between Bacillus Subtilis and E.coli. Then, we want to characterize this communiction as best as we can using carefully crafted genetic designs. We also aim at proposing new applications combining synthetic biology and the nanotubes network.
Each step of our project corresponds to a new level of understanding of the nanotube network inner mechanisms.
Direct observation
We want first to reproduce the observations made in the initial paper. To this end, we reproduced the antibiotic and the GFP experiments. We also introduced new parameters when possible and searched for every possible explanation for our results.
Since we did not have access to an electronic microscopy facility, we were not able to reproduce the most striking pictures of the article. However, we were determine to obtain quantitative and reliable results with a little help from synthetic biology.
Characterization
Our second aim wass to characterize the nanotubes: what passes through them and what are the typical diffusion times through the network. We tested if RNA, proteins of different sizes and/or metabolites can pass through and with which ease and rate. The idea is to pass different molecules so that we can caracterize the speed and the transfer mechanism process. For that purpose, we engineered, using synthetic biology approaches, [2] different designs built on this logic:
- An emitter cell that produces a messenger (RNA, protein etc.)
- This messenger passes through the nanotubes and into the receiver cell
- The emitter cell has specific promoters that activates an amplification system
- This amplification system in turn trigger a detection mechanism we can measure (fluroescence, others)
Even though the inter-species (B.subtilis-E.coli) connection seemed more difficult to reproduce according to the Dubey/Ben-Yehuda paper, we decided to explore it along with the B.subtilis-B.subtilis connection. This was mainly motivated by the overwhelming number of Biobricks available for E.coli when compared to those avalaible for B.subtilis.
Dump the rest ?
As a general outline we will first investigate the inter-species (subtilis-coli) connection to take advantage of all the existing biobricks for E .coli We will then move on to an intra-species (subtilis to subtilis) connection and develop new parts specific to subtilis
Master-slave system
Once the nanotubes will be caracterized, we would like to try the emitor cell to control the response of the receiver cell. The idea is that when an emittor cell meet a receiver cell, it triggers a change in the state of the latter, change, that is reversible. For that reason, we need to build a reversible amplification system. This will be acheive usinf the ComK/ComS system (see desing page)
What are the processes involved in the motion in nanotubes?
The results from the paper suggests that there can be an active process that makes the transfert of the cell constituents from the irst one to the secon faster thant the simple diffusion. This statement is to take with caution. A completely active process would involve specific transporters whereas the variety of the molecules transported indicate thate there are probably no specificity in the transport. To go farther in the research of what is really happening at the molecular scale, we runned several simulation and formal calculation to demonstrate the feasability, and calculate the speed of the mixing of the cells constituents through the nanotubes. To go farther, we propose a new mechanism, that would be driven by membrane tension relaxation, using a statistical physic approach. Is the communication directional or non directional? This is one of the key that would make the difference between the different mechanism proposed. To see more about our modeling, we recommand you to go on the modeling wiki page.
