Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our Project/Assembly

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Adding the inverter)
(TetR plasmid)
Line 100: Line 100:
== TetR plasmid ==
== TetR plasmid ==
 +
 +
=== Inserting TetR under constitutive promoter ===
This assembly was quite tricky, as we had to test 3 plasmids before succeeding.
This assembly was quite tricky, as we had to test 3 plasmids before succeeding.
-
* We first took the J23019 plasmid from the registry and designed plasmids, but we never succeeded in amplifying something during PCRs. We assumed that probably the plasmid is not exactly the one described in the registry and went on with plasmid number 2.
+
* We first took the J23019 plasmid from the registry and designed plasmids, but we never succeeded in amplifying it during PCRs. We assumed that probably the plasmid is not exactly the one described in the registry and went on with plasmid number 2.
* Our second choice was pSB3C5, as we could partially reuse the primers designed for J23019. But the PCR results were very weak and the assembly failed.
* Our second choice was pSB3C5, as we could partially reuse the primers designed for J23019. But the PCR results were very weak and the assembly failed.
* So finally we used '''pSB3K1''', which is really similar to pSB3C5, designed new primers and succeeded in doing the Gibson assembly!
* So finally we used '''pSB3K1''', which is really similar to pSB3C5, designed new primers and succeeded in doing the Gibson assembly!
Line 114: Line 116:
|-
|-
| pSB3K1 backbone  
| pSB3K1 backbone  
-
| pSB3k1 plasmid - from registry   
+
| pSB3K1 plasmid - from registry   
| none
| none
|-
|-
| Pconst-TetR
| Pconst-TetR
| Repressilator plasmid  
| Repressilator plasmid  
-
| Constitutive promoter (pConst), RBS and spacer  
+
| Constitutive promoter (Pconst), RBS and spacer  
|}
|}
 +
 +
=== Cutting out RFP ===
 +
 +
We were surprised to see that the colonies recovered after Gibson assembly were red, indicating that the pSB3K1 plasmid contains RFP. By looking at it more carefully, we discovered that we had included the Biobrick region with our primers, which explains why RFP was present in our pSB3K1 backbone. taking advantage of the BioBrick format, we digested our pSB3K1 Pconst-TetR plasmid with SpeI and XbaI and then successfully religated.
[[File:EPFL_Tetr_plasmid.jpg|300px]]
[[File:EPFL_Tetr_plasmid.jpg|300px]]
-
This plasmid seems to contain RFP, although not present in the sequence on partregistry...
 
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}

Revision as of 14:55, 22 August 2011