Team:Cornell/Results

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Invitro Biosynthesis)
(Mathematical Modeling)
Line 152: Line 152:
=Mathematical Modeling=
=Mathematical Modeling=
Using the Comsol Multiphysic software we created a velocity profile for our microfluidic device.
Using the Comsol Multiphysic software we created a velocity profile for our microfluidic device.
 +
 +
 +
'''Entire Chip'''                               '''Initial Test (in water)'''         '''After 4 Days'''
 +
 +
<html><img src="http://s1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc481/mg573/comsol%20models/?action=view&current=entirechip.jpg"></img>&nbsp; <img src="http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l125/youngpaduan/1st%20GFP%20lysate%20test/th_GFPTestGradient.jpg"></img>&nbsp; <img src="http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l125/youngpaduan/1st%20GFP%20lysate%20test/th_Jimstestbeforeh2owash.jpg"></img>&nbsp; <img src="http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l125/youngpaduan/1st%20GFP%20lysate%20test/th_Jimstestafterh2owashfirstturn.jpg"></img>&nbsp; <img src="http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l125/youngpaduan/1st%20GFP%20lysate%20test/th_Jimstestafterh2owashinletwall2.jpg"></img></html>

Revision as of 22:10, 28 October 2011

Results | Protocol | Notebook | Parts Submitted

Results Cornell2011.jpg

Contents

Results Summary

Two of the main components of our project are as follows:

  • Avi-tagged enzymes that modify a substrate according to a biosynthetic pathway
  • Avidin coated microfluidic channels which bind avitagged proteins

We decided to test these components separately before we conducted a final biomodification test. Below are the tests we conducted:

  1. The modified enzymes: Do our modified enzymes modify our substrate in a non-microfluidic setting?
  2. The microfluidic device :
    1. Will biotinylated fluorescent probes attach to (Neutra)avidin coated walls of the microfluidic device?
    2. How long will biotinylated substances stay attached to the microfluidic device under continuous flow?
    3. Will biotinylated GFP bind to our microfluidic device?
  3. Final bio-modification test: Will biotinylated enzymes bound to a microfluidic device modify our substrate?

From these experiments we were able to extrapolate various results.

Cornell11 resultssummary.jpg

1) Enzymatic Pathway

Through the summer, we successfully constructed the tagged violacein pathway enzymes VioA, VioB, and VioE and submitted those parts to the registry. These three enzymes in series are capable of converting L-tryptophan into prodeoxyviolacein, a dark green colored intermediate of the violacein pathway. Each enzyme sequence was constructed to have the AviTag sequence included on its C-terminus, followed by the stop codon so that one single fusion protein is expressed. The AviTag is capable of biotinylating the enzymes so that they can be bound to surfaces using a simple NeutrAvidin ligand system.

To simplify the construction process, each enzyme sequence was PCR'd off the iGEM Distribution sample with a KpnI site followed by the iGEM prefix, the gene of interest, and ended with an SphI or HindIII site that replaced the location of the stop codon. These PCR products could then be ligated into a modified pZE12-SMCS backbone which contained the AviTag sequence followed by the stop codon, iGEM suffix and ClaI site. This backbone was constructed using the primer insert method outlined in the Project Description.

Vio Enzymes Western Blot Cornell2011.jpg

With the modified enzymes, we performed experiments to show their expression and utilization of tryptophan using a UV/Vis spectrometer at the peak wavelengths at which tryptophan responds to (590,638, and 562 nm). The OD measurements of solutions contain equivolume of VioA, VioB, 40 mM Hydrogen Peroxide (for oxidation of tryptophan) and VioE lysate with varying concentration of tryptophan. The results are shown below.

Graph-Tryptophan,Vioenzymes Cornell2011.jpg

The green points represent readings at 562 nm, blue at 590 nm, and red at 638 nm at 0.008 g/mL concentration of L-Tryptophan and 40 mM H202. As you can see, the absorbance of tryptophan noticeably decreases over a time course of 1 hour. This experiment was recreated varying the ratio of enzymes and concentration of initial tryptophan. The results showed a similar decreasing trend.

Control.jpg

This is the control tryptophan readings. In the absence of violacein enzymes, the amount of tryptophan showed the opposite trend.

Peak wavelength values were found with the following reference

Sánchez, C Reevaluation of the violacein biosynthetic pathway and its relationship to indolocarbazole biosynthesis. Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology Vol. 7, 8, 2006, p. 1231

Microfluidics Assembly

Binding Experiment

Goal - to determine if the biotinylated enzymes would attach to the NeutrAvidin coated wall.

Experiment

  • Negative Control - chip that is not coated with NeutrAvidin through which we flowed ATTO 590.
  • Test - NeutrAvidin coated chip through which we flowed ATTO 590.
  • Flow Rate - 5 µL/min
  • Run Time - 20 min
After the experiment, air was flown through the chips and pictures were taken.

Results

The red fluorescence indicates that the enzyme successfully bound to the channel wall.

Control                              Test

 

Lysate Experiment

Goal - to determine the effect lysate would have on the binding efficiency between the NeutrAvidin coated walls and the biotinylated enzymes.

Experiment

  • Positive Control - NeutrAvidin coated chip through which we flowed ATTO 520
  • Negative Control - uncoated chip through which we flowed ATTO 520
  • Test - NeutrAvidin coated chip through which we flowed a 5:1 ratio of lysate to ATTO 520.
  • Flow Rate = 5 µL/min
  • Total Run Time = 30 min
Entire setup was covered in aluminum foil and the lights were dimmed.

After the experiment, air was flown through the chips and pictures were taken. Channels were filled with deionized water and stored in the 4 degree fridge wrapped in aluminum foil.

Results

The test chip showed a lower level of fluorescence compared to the positive control chip. This indicates that lysate has a small inhibitory effect on the binding between NeutrAvidin and biotin.

Negative Control                   Positive Control               Test

   

Continuous Flow Experiment

Goal - to determine how long the attached enzymes would stay attached under continuous flow.

  • Negative Control - noncoated chip
  • Test - Flow DI water through a chip with ATTO 520 attached to the NeutrAvidin coated PDMS for 15min.
  • Flow Rate = 200 µL/min
  • Total Run Time = 45 min (three 15 min intervals)
After each interval, the chip was washed with air and a picture was taken in air.

Results

The pictures indicate that the fluorescence gradually decreases under continuous flow. This suggests that the chips might have to be recoated after extended wear.

Control                               After 15 min                   After 30 min                        After 45 min

   

GFP BioBrick

Goal - to determine if our AviTagged GFP will bind to our NeutrAvidin-coated chip.

Experiment

  • Negative Control - A coated chip that is flushed with deionized Water
  • Test - A chip coated with NeutrAvidin with filtered GFP lysate flown through
  • Flow Rate - 5 µL/min
  • Total Run Time - 20 min
The GFP containing cells were lysed with BugBuster and filtered through a PD-10 Desalting Columns to remove excess biotin. Afterwards the chip was stored in deionized water in the fridge in aluminum foil. 4 days later we took the chip out and imaged it again. Then deionized water was flushed through and the chip was reimaged. It was seen that most of the binding occurred at the inlet port and the first channel. By the second channel, no fluorescence was detected.

Results

The presence of green fluorescence shows that our BioBrick successfully bound to the channel wall. Furthermore, green fluorescence was still present even after the chip was stored for 4 days in the fridge. However, the fluorescence after 4 days was significantly less than the initial fluorescence.

Control                               Initial Test (in water)         After 4 Days

       

Invitro Biosynthesis

Goal - to determine if prodeoxyviolacein can be produced in our cell free system.

GoodViosetup Cornell2011.jpg

Experiment

  • Negative Control - 3 coated chips (blank chips) with tryptophan flushed through
  • Control 1 - VioA chip, VioB chip and a Blank chip
  • Control 2 - VioA chip and Blank chip ::*Test - VioA chip, VioB chip and VioE chip
  • Flow Rate - 5 µL/min
  • Total Run Time - 6 hours
Enzymes were incubated in the chips for 1 hour with no flow. The enzyme solution was
then replace with fresh enzyme solution and incubated again for 1 hr.

Results

z


VioResults Cornell2011.jpg

Light-Induced Lysis

We designed the light-induced apoptosis system using APE and submitted the part to Invitrogen Life Technologies for synthesis. Given our final construct was in excess of 6,000 bp, synthesis is currently being performed into two subsections. The first of which is the light sensitive promoter (Pcpcg2) followed by the lysis cassette and the genes necessary for the biosynthesis of phycobilins. The second component was the CCaS and CCaR. CCaS is the surface 532 nm green light activated protein which phosphorylates, and activates, CCaR to bind to the light sensitive promoter and express the downstream gene.

So far, we have received the second component of our light system, and we have BioBricked this part for submission and use with the international parts registry. Please see [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K597105 this page] for more information.

Mathematical Modeling

Using the Comsol Multiphysic software we created a velocity profile for our microfluidic device.


Entire Chip                               Initial Test (in water)         After 4 Days