Revision as of 12:47, 19 October 2011

Team IGEM Paris 2011

T7 diffusion experiments

Abstract

Design overview

Schematic summary of the T7 diffusion device

All of the parts of the above design have been BioBricked, characterized both in E.coli and B.subtilis, and sent to the registry.

More details on the design are available here.

Parts and BioBricks construction

You can find the cloning plan for the T7 RNA polymerase design below:

INSERT CLONING PLAN

Setback with the pHyperspank promoter

At the beginning of the project, we intended to use a pHyperSpank promoter (Ph-s, BBa_K143055) in front of the emitter construct. The Ph-s promoter is repressed by LacI and would have allowed us to use an IPTG-inducible promoter. However, our first experiments with the promoter were inconclusive. We sequenced our sample and realized that we had received a BioBrick of the size of Ph-s but not the one we expected. It was anoter gene entirely. Rather than losing weeks of experiments waiting for another HyperSpank promoter, we chose to use a constitutive Pveg promoter (BBa_K143053).

Characterization of the T7 promoter

In order to characterize the pT7 promoter, we used the construct pT7-RBS-GFP-T7ter. This construct was transformed into BL21 strains (E.coli) expressing the T7 polymerase under IPTG induction.

Fluorescence kinetics

The measurements have been carried out on a spectrophotometer at 37°C under transient shaking. The experiment lasted 4h, we tested several colonies and several IPTG concentrations. The OD at 600nm and the fluorescence of the GFP (exc: 470nm / meas:515 nm) was measured every 5 min and the ratio of the two was calculated.

All values were normalized by substracting the fluorescence/OD value of the well with 0 mM IPTG at time 0. The values given are in arbitrary units.

Fig1: Growth curves for BL21 strain carrying the part

After 2 hrs of induction, we see a clear increase of the fluorescence proportional to the IPTG concentration (that is to say with the quantity of T7 polymerase induced in the cell). After 4 hrs, the expression of GFP under the pT7 is still not saturated

Fig2: Comparison of the Fluo/OD ratio for transcription

Here we plot the ratio of induction of the T7 polymerase dependant construct for the different concentrations of IPTG at a given time (4 hrs) taking the well with 0 IPTG at time 0 as the reference.

Characterization of the T7 RFP emitter <--TO BE CORRECTED HEAVILY

We found out there is a small leakage with the T7 emitter RFP. The cells in which RFP production is activated stop dividing and glow very strongly.

T7 emitter RFP + Control in E.coli at 37°C
E.coli at 37°C (trans image)	E.coli at 37°C (rfp image)
E.coli negative control at 37°C (trans image)	E.coli negative control at 37°C (rfp image)

The first pictures show that the RFP construct is working efficiently since some cells are glowing with RFP fluorescence. This also shows the system is not as leaky as we expected. Indeed, the promoter regulating RFP expression is 'pVeg' which is a constitutive promoter. Finally, the RFP system is working very well because when leak occurs, cells glow very strongly.

Characterization of the T7 signal amplification leakage

We characterized T7 autoloop (receiver part of the construct, BBa_K606036) in E.coli, when hosted in the plasmid pSB1C3. The idea was to see if the system was leaky inside a synthetic biology plasmid, that is to say, a plasmid holding 4 terminators before any construct.

T7 autoloop in E.coli at 37°C
E.coli T7 autoloop without terminator at 37°C (trans image)	E.coli T7 autoloop without terminator at 37°C (gfp image)
E.coli T7 autoloop with terminator at 37°C (trans image)	E.coli T7 autoloop with terminator at 37°C (gfp image)
E.coli negative control at 37°C (trans image)	E.coli negative control at 37°C (gfp image)

These pictures show that the T7 GFP autoloop system is efficient since some cells are glowing with GFP fluorescence. Thus, we can conclude that the T7 polymerase is activated. Finally, we notice there is no difference between the GFP autoloop with and without terminator before the T7 promoter. It could be due to that terminator which is a B.subtilis terminator. Moreover, we know that this E.coli strain has 4 terminators.