|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/TetRtemplate|title=''In-Vitro'' Characterization}} | | {{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/TetRtemplate|title=''In-Vitro'' Characterization}} |
| - |
| |
| - | After having considered several potential transcription factor candidates, the choice was made to use TetR for our transcription factor development pipeline. TetR has several advantages:
| |
| - | * It exhibits a strong affinity to its consensus sequence
| |
| - | * It has already been well characterized in the literature. This characterization is especially true of the protein region involved in promoter recognition, the latter having been the subject of substantive review and research. TetR mutants showing an altered specificity have already been reported, which is encouraging news in light of our project topic.
| |
| - | * TetR is one of the most frequently-used transcription factors in synthetic biology. To expand knowledge of its engineering and scientific properties would be of significant interest to the synthetic biology community.
| |
| - | * It can be easily repressed by adding anhydrotetracycline (ATC) – a relatively inexpensive molecule.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | == Background Information about TetR ==
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Widespread among bacteria, TetR is a '''repressor''' that regulates enzymes essential for resistance against the antibiotic tetracycline. These enzymes are encoded on the tet operon (TetO), which is repressed by TetR in normal conditions. When tetracycline is present, the antibiotic molecule binds to TetR and inactivates it, thus allowing the expression of TetO.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | TetR forms a dimer, each part of the dimer being involved in DNA binding. Consequently, the recognition sequence of TetR is symmetrical (the two boxes on the image below), with a base pair separating the two sub-sequences. [http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/73324 Orth et al, 2000]
| |
| - | The whole promoter, comprising this recognition sequence, is called Ptet.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | [[File:EPFL_TetR_consensus.jpg]]
| |
| - |
| |
| - |
| |
| - | The binding of each monomer to the recognition sequence has been studied thoroughly; we know which amino acid interacts to which nucleotide, as can be seen in the figure below. The amino acids directly involved in binding to the DNA are found in between position 26 and 48 of each monomer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1197418/?tool=pubmed Ramos et al, 2005]
| |
| - |
| |
| - | [[File:EPFL_TetR_contact_map.jpg|500px]]
| |
| - |
| |
| - |
| |
| - | The impact of one or several amino acids changes on the binding strength and specificity is less known. Amino acids in direct proximity to or the residues binding DNA are probably crucial - but more distant amino acids could also have an influence due to allosteric effects. Some TetR mutants that have an altered recognition sequence have been characterized in the literature.
| |
| - |
| |
| - | The effects of the mutations V36F, E37A, P39K and Y42F were described in [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378111907004623 Krueger et al, 2007].
| |
| - | [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283697915400 Helbl et al, 1998] states other interesting mutants: the P39Q mutation was shown to exhibit a new recognition specificity for the tetO-4C operator and the E37A Y42M P39Q said to have the highest affinity for tetO-4C.
| |
| - |
| |
| | | | |
| | {{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}} | | {{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}} |
"
