"
Team:Groningen/project characterisation mu
From 2011.igem.org
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
This result shows that both, tag and RBS, used for the expression of the transcription factor have a huge impact on the bimodal behavior of the autoinducing loop. All loops that contain a LVA-tag tag are inactive if not induced. Those without any tag are mostly active even without induction while those with a DAS-tag show a bimodal behavior. | This result shows that both, tag and RBS, used for the expression of the transcription factor have a huge impact on the bimodal behavior of the autoinducing loop. All loops that contain a LVA-tag tag are inactive if not induced. Those without any tag are mostly active even without induction while those with a DAS-tag show a bimodal behavior. | ||
Especially the cells carrying the plasmids with a strong RBS in the autoinducing loop look promising. | Especially the cells carrying the plasmids with a strong RBS in the autoinducing loop look promising. | ||
| - | [[File:1cInotag.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 4.''' [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607022 BBa_K607022 | + | [[File:1cInotag.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 4.''' [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607022 BBa_K607022] This autoinducing loop does exhibit heterogenity when non-induced. Two populations are visible - a population that is not producing GFP and a population that is producing GFP is observed. That means that the loop is induced in some of the cells through a leaky promoter. Changing the promoter to a less leaky version might make it a good candidate for an inducible and robust bistable switch.]] |
| - | [[File:1cIDAS.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 5.'''[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607018 BBa_K607018 | + | [[File:1cIDAS.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 5.''' [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607018 BBa_K607018] This autoinducing loop does exhibit heterogenity when non-induced. Two populations are visible - a population that is not producing GFP and a population that is producing GFP is observed. That means that the loop is induced in some of the cells through a leaky promoter. Changing the promoter to a less leaky version might make it a good candidate for an inducible bistable switch.]] |
| - | [[File:1cILVA.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 6.'''[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607013 BBa_K607013 | + | [[File:1cILVA.png|thumb|700px|center|'''Figure 6.''' [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K607013 BBa_K607013] This autoinducing loop does not exhibit heterogenity when non-induced. Only the population that is not producing GFP is observed. That means that the loop is not induced through a leaky promoter and is a good candidate for an inducible bistable switch.]] |
| + | |||
{{FooterGroningen2011}} | {{FooterGroningen2011}} | ||
Revision as of 17:42, 21 September 2011
Lambda cI autoinducing loop family
The autoinducing loop driven by cI will function as our first memory unit. We aimed to find a combination of RBS, transcription factor and degradation tag that enables us to toggle between the two steady states in a robust way. To estimate the rate in which single cells are activated by too much leakage of cI protein we measured the fluorescence in uninduced cells with a flow cytometer. To measure the activation we used a construct with the PRM promoter producing GFP with an LVA tag to make dynamic measurement possible.
| cI autoinducing loop 1 (BBa_K00) after 4 hours of incubation | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 1. A dotplot of uninduced cells carrying the pSB1K3 plasmid with the biobrick BBa_ and the plasmid pSB1A3 with as well an input(PBAD controlling cI) as well as the output (PRM controlling GFP-LVA). |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Two populations are visible on the dotplot. We seperated both populations on the histogram to show that the major peak of nonfluorescent cells overlaps the minor peak of fluorescenting cells. | |||||||||||||||||
| cI autoinducing loop 6 (BBa_K00) after 4 hours of incubation | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 2. A dotplot of uninduced cells carrying the pSB1K3 plasmid with the biobrick BBa_ and the plasmid pSB1A3 with as well an input(PBAD controlling cI) as well as the output (PRM controlling GFP-LVA). |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Only one population is visible on the dotplot. The histogram was obtained in the same fashion as in figure 1 to show that there are cultures with activated cI loops and cultures without. | |||||||||||||||||
These measurements indicate activation and by this bimodal behaviour of cells containig BBa_. But no activation of BBa_ and several other constructs. In these measurements we used GFP-LVA. The degradation seems to be about as fast as the production so only faint signals are visible. We decided to repeat the measurement with similar constructs but with GFP instead of GFP-LVA as an output.
| no-tag | DAS | LVA | |||||
| RBS 0,07 |
|
|
| 
| |||
| RBS 0,3 |
|
|
| ||||
| RBS 0,6 |
|
|
| ||||
| RBS 1 |
|
|
| ||||
| Figure 3. Flow cytometer data taken at different time-points during exponential growth of cells carrying different cI autoinducing loops. | |||||||
This result shows that both, tag and RBS, used for the expression of the transcription factor have a huge impact on the bimodal behavior of the autoinducing loop. All loops that contain a LVA-tag tag are inactive if not induced. Those without any tag are mostly active even without induction while those with a DAS-tag show a bimodal behavior. Especially the cells carrying the plasmids with a strong RBS in the autoinducing loop look promising.
