"
Team:UPO-Sevilla/Project/Improving Flip Flop/asRNA/Conclusions
From 2011.igem.org
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="left"> | <div class="left"> | ||
| - | </html>{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/ | + | </html>{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/leftTemplateProjectImproved}}<html> |
| + | |||
| + | <script type="text/javascript"> | ||
| + | $("#menuVIRConclusions").addClass("menuSelected"); | ||
| + | </script> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/footTemplate}} | {{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/footTemplate}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:17, 27 October 2011
Conclusions
In the same way as with the proteolysis system, here we are repressing both State 2 reporter and State 1 repressor when State 1 is the dominant. The conclusions of this mechanism are the same that with proteolysis: RFP residual signal will be minimized while PcI expression will be enhanced, as it won’t be repressed. By doing this, we will shorten the switching time between states and obtain the clearest signal difference.
Sponsors
