From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 23:03, 28 October 2011

Media:Example.ogg<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Biotweet - Collaboration

Characterization of Parts

In order to characterize our two theophylline riboswitches and our atrazine riboswitch, we performed the following assays:


Fluorometry	Fluorescence microscopy: Liquid Culture	Fluorescence microscopy: Smeared Culture	Motility	Chemotaxis

Theophylline Riboswitches

To characterise the theophylline riboswitches (1 and 2), we quantified their activation at different theophylline concentrations (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM and 2 mM) over a period of time using fluorometry. Competent E. coli (strain DH5a) cells were transformed with plasmid vectors containing the riboswitch and were cultured until the mid-log phase of growth. Thereafter, a different concentration of theophylline was added to each culture for induction. The activation of the riboswitch was detected as a fluorescent response as a result of increased translation of the fluorescent fusion protein CheZ-Venus, in the presence of the activator. A Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer was used to excite the cultures at 514 nm and the intensity of the emission peak was detected at 528 nm. Twenty readings were taken every 15 minutes for each culture, for a total period of 135 minutes. An empty vector was used to correct for autofluorescence. Conversely, a construct that comprised of a RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537013) was used as a positive control. Fluorescent data for the 3D plots (Fig 1-4) were corrected for autofluorescence by subtracting the fluorescent values of the cultures transformed with the empty vector, from that of the riboswitches.

Figure 1: The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein from construct Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537011). A) The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The fluorescence increased over time, with an increasing concentration of theophylline, indicating the theophylline concentration-dependent expression of the CheZ-Venus fluorescent fusion protein. The fluorescence peaks 105 minutes after the addition of 1 mM theophylline. B) The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1 mM theophylline after 105 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1 mM theophylline). 1 mM of theophylline induced the expression of CheZ-Venus to increase 8-fold after 105 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 105 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)

Figure 2: The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein from the Riboswitch 1 Venus construct (BBa_K537009). A) The fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 75 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, compared to riboswitch 1, which contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. The maximum fluorescent intensity observed was also lower by a factor of 2 RFU. B) The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 75 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 8-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 75 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). This fold change is comparable to that described in Figure 1. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)

Figure 3: The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein from the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012) construct. A) The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The same trend of increased switch activation over time, with increasing theophylline concentrations was seen as with theophylline riboswitch 1. However, with the theophylline riboswitch 2, the fluorescence peaks 135 minutes after the addition of 1.5 mM theophylline. B) The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1.5 mM theophylline after 135 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1.5 mM theophylline). 1.5 mM of theophylline induced a 46-fold increase in CheZ-Venus expression after 135 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 135 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)

Figure 4: The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein the Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537010) construct. A) The activation of the riboswitch was affected by the lack of the CheZ gene in the switch construct. The increase in fluorescence was minimal upon induction and incubation over time. Furthermore, the fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 60 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, when compared to the theophylline riboswitch 2 that contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. B) The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 60 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 2-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 60 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values) . This is far less than the value described for the same switch in Figure 2. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05.(Click to enlarge)

Both the theophylline riboswitches displayed activation in response to increasing theophylline concentrations and incubation times. Theophylline riboswitch 2 controlling CheZ-Venus expression (BBa_K537012) clearly showed a superior level of activation compared to that theophylline-controlled riboswitch 1 (BBa_K537011). This was expected as it was selected by FACS for its optimised expression platform that allows for minimal leakiness at basal levels, and a strong activation in the presence of theophylline (Lynch and Gallivan, 2009). The activation shown by both the riboswitches regulating CheZ-Venus expression should be able to restore the motility of E. coli cells deficient in CheZ, in the presence of theophylline. More importantly, the theophylline concentration-dependent increase in CheZ-Venus expression alludes to the ability of directed cell movement, that is moving up concentration gradients of theophylline (Topp and Gallivan, 2007). Interestingly, the data suggests that the presence of the CheZ gene, as part of the CheZ-Venus fusion sequence, enhances the activation of the switches when compared to the constructs with venus alone. This may be due to some sort of structural stability conferred by the presence of the CheZ sequence.

Atrazine Riboswitch

Preliminary activation data was obtained for the atrazine riboswitch.Fluorometry was performed on E. coli (DH5a) cells transformed with a construct that contained a Atrazine Riboswitch mRFP(BBa_K537014). Similar to the theophylline riboswitches, different concentrations (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, 2 mM) of atrazine were added to the cultures for induction. The cultures were excited at 584 nm and detected at 607 nm using a Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer. Readings were taken every 15 minutes for 120 minutes in total. The same empty vector was used as a negative control. The 3D plot data was normalised the same way as for the theophylline riboswitches.

Figure 5: The fluorescence of the mRFP1 reporter protein under the regulation of the atrazine riboswitch(BBa_K537014) construct. A) The activation of the atrazine riboswitch at different atrazine concentrations over time. There was an increase in fluorescence as the atrazine concentration and incubation time increased. The amount of fluorescence detected was very small, with a maximum of 0.1 RFU detected after 75 minutes of incubation with 2 mM atrazine. B) The maximum was compared to the negative control at 75 minutes, 2 mM atrazine, and to that of fluorescent levels detected at basal levels (0 minutes, 2 mM atrazine). A 1.7-fold increase in expression of mRFP1 was observed over the 75 minute period (values used for the calculation had the corresponding negative control value subtracted first).(Click to enlarge)

References

Lynch, S. A. & Gallivan, J. P. 2009. A flow cytometry-based screen for synthetic riboswitches. Nucleic Acids Res, 37, 184-92.

Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am Chem Soc, 129, 6807-11.

Back to top

Epi-fluorescence Wide-Field Microscopy

Fluorescent imaging was performed for a qualitative assay of the engineered bacteria.

200 µl of each bacterial culture sample was imaged using a Zeiss Axioscope (Andor EMCCD Camera, Till Photonics Polychrome V)in microscopic plates.

Widefield fluorescence microscopy was used to assess the expression of the Venus protein. The bacterial samples were excited at 500 nm using the polychrome as an excitation source. The fluorescence was then observed by capturing light in the emission spectrum of Venus (528 nm). Corresponding bright-field images (using white light) were also captured for each experiment. For a protocol of our methods, please click here.

Below are the images that were obtained for the parental strain (BW25113) of the E. coli ΔCheZ- mutant (which served as the negative control) and the ΔCheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (BBa_K537009) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537010).

Please note: Bacteria which were transformed with constructs which contained the CheZ gene were not tested in this assay. This experiment served as a means of observing the activation of the theophylline riboswitches, hence only expression of the venus reporter protein was needed for detection of fluorescence. Activation of motility was not assessed in this case – it was examined in the motility assays on semi-solid agar plates. Differences in fluorescence intensities were not calculated from the images below since the fluorometry experiments served as the quantitative approach to measurement of riboswitch activation.

Figure 6: Epifluorescence wide-field microscopy. The parental strain (BW25113) of the E. coli ΔCheZ mutants were not transformed with any plasmid DNA (left panels). As expected, in both the absence and presence of theophylline, the parental bacteria did not fluoresce. E. coli ΔCheZ mutants which were transformed with the Riboswitch 1 Venus (BBa_K537009) expression construct (middle panel). In the absence of theophylline, almost no fluorescence occurred. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, many of the cells emitted fluorescence indicating activation of the theophylline riboswitch type 1. E.coli CheZ-deletion mutants which were transformed with the Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537010) expression construct. The brightfield images in the left column depict all bacterial cells. The venus images in the right column depict bacterial cells which emitted fluorescence. In the absence of theophylline, some fluorescence was observed. This result showed the leakiness of the riboswitch. A substantial amount of venus translation is permitted because of the flexible conformation of this riboswitch. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, much more fluorescence was detected. More venus was expressed in these cells due to the activation of the riboswitch via theophylline.(Click to enlarge)

Back to top

Fluorescent imaging was performed again after the European Jamboree, using a different technique. For a protocol of our "smeared culture" methods, please click here. The aim of this data is to depict the exact same brightfield and fluorescent static fields of view.

Figure 7: The parental untransformed CheZ deletion mutant strain serves as the negative control, displaying a lack of fluorescence in both the absence and presence of theophylline. The RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537013) construct serves as a positive control with constituitive expression of the CheZ protein, irrespective of theophylline. (Click to enlarge)

Figure 8: Theophylline-mediated activation of gene expression using riboswitches type 1 and 2: Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(BBa_K537011), Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012), Riboswitch 1 Venus (BBa_K537009) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537013) (Click to enlarge)

Back to top

Semi-solid agar plates containing different concentrations of theophylline (0mM, 0.5mM, 1.0mM and 1.5mM) were made. Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(BBa_K537011), Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012), Riboswitch 1 Venus (BBa_K537009) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537013) were transformed into ΔCheZ mutant E.coli and grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.55). 1.5 µl of culture was plated into the centre of the plates containing the various concentrations of theophylline and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. This experiment was performed in triplicate. The protocol for this experiment can be found here.

The Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus transformants did not travel from the point of inoculation for all concentrations of theophylline. The CheZ deletion mutants containing Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus travelled 0 mm at 0 mM theophylline and reached a maximum travelling distance of 5 mm at 1.5 mM theophylline. ΔCheZ E.coli transformed wuth the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus construct travelled 2 mm in the absence of theophylline. At a concentration of 1.5 mM theophylline, Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus travel 22mm from the point of inoculation

Figure 9: 85 mm semi-solid agar plates containing 1.0 mM theophylline showing the point of inoculation and distance travelled by the bacteria. A) Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase ΔCheZ mutant E.coli transformed with Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(BBa_K537011). There is evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation.B) Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase E. coli ΔCheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (control). Converse to A, there is no evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation C) Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase E. coli CheZ deletion mutants transformed with Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012). There is evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation. D) Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase E. coli ΔCheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 2 Venus. Converse to C, there is no evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation (Click to enlarge)

Figure 10: The distance travelled by ΔCheZ mutant E.coli(mm) over a 24 hour period at 37°C on semi-solid agar plates containing different theophylline concentrations (mM). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.001.(Click to enlarge)

Discussion and conclusion

The construct Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus transformed into the ΔCheZ bacteria are non-motile at a concentration of 0 mM theophylline, since in the absence of the activator, the riboswitch is sequestering the RBS and thus inhibiting the translation of CheZ (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). On the semi-solid agar plates containing theophylline, the motility of E.coli is evident, as the interaction of theophylline with the riboswitch enables the exposure of the RBS and the translation of the downstream CheZ, allowing for bacterial motility. The distance travelled by the bacteria transformed with the Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus construct, from the start position (mm) in the presence of different concentrations of theophylline, is not significantly different (P=0.005). This indicates that the CheZ expression at 0.5 mM-1.5 mM is sufficient to allow the bacteria to move a distance of 5 mm. The construct Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus transformed into the CheZ deletion mutants are slightly motile in the absence of theophylline, travelling 2mm over a 24 hour period indicating that this riboswitch is slightly leaky. Upon addition of 0.5 mM-1.5 mM theophylline, the bacteria were able to travel 20mm over a 24 hour period.

The distance travelled from the start position by the CheZ deletion mutants containing the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus construct is significantly higher than that those with the Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus construct. This can be explained by the high fold-increase in CheZ protein expression by this riboswitch, as shown by fluorometry (46-fold higher compared to 8-fold higher). Theophylline riboswitch 1 has a lower fold increase in CheZ expression from 0 mM to 1.5 mM theophylline, compared to the increase shown by the theophylline riboswitch 2. Therefore, in order to achieve maximum motility under the control of theophylline, at concentrations of between 0.5 mM and 1.5 mM, theophylline riboswitch 2 should be used.

References

Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007.Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am ChemSoc, 129, 6807-11

Both the Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus constructs transformed into the ΔCheZ mutant E.coli are non-motile, each having travelled a distance of 0mm at all concentrations of theophylline (See A and B). This indicates that in the absence of the CheZ protein, the bacteria are non-motile (Topps and Gallivan, 2007).

Back to top

In order to determine whether we had successfully engineered the E. coli CheZ deletion mutants to chemotactically migrate towards theophylline, we performed a capillary assay. Bacteria transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (BBa_K537009), Riboswitch 2 Venus (BBa_K537010), RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537013), Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537011) and Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012) were grown to mid-log phase. Activation of chemotaxis was achieved by incubating the cultures with 1 mM theophylline prior to the assay. A 50 µl drop of each culture was then placed onto separate sterile surfaces and two capillary tubes were placed into each drop. The first capillary tube was a control, containing only PBS and 20 µM EDTA. The second tube contained PBS, 20 µM and 2mM theophylline. The two capillary tubes were suspended into each drop of culture for 30 minutes. A dilution series of the solutions in the tubes were plated and colonies counted after 12 hours. Further details of this protocol can be found here.

Figure 11: A graphic illustration of the chemotaxis "capillary" assay showing the apparatus, experiment and the determination of the Chemotaxis Index (Click to enlarge)

Figure 12: The chemotaxis index of ΔCheZ E. coli transformed with Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus, Riboswitch 1 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537011, BBa_K537009, and BBa_K537013; upper graph); and transformed with Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus, Riboswitch 2 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537011, BBa_K537012, and BBa_K537013; lower graph). The Chemotaxis Index of 100 was established for controls BBa_K537009 and BBa_K537010, indicating bacteria travelled equally towards 0mM and 2.0mM theophylline. This suggest no chemo-attraction towards theophylline. Interestingly, the same was observed for the positive control RBS CheZ Venus (BBa_K537013) which is always "on" for CheZ. Conversely, the chemotaxis index of 230 for Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537011) and 175 for Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (BBa_K537012) suggested and increased movement towards 2.0mM theophylline, strongly indicating riboswitch-controlled chemo-attraction. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)

Discussion and conclusion

Cells transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus, Riboswitch 2 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus all displayed an index of approximately 100, indicating the same number of bacteria moved towards the control (0mM theophylline) and the experiment (2mM theophylline) capillary tube. This proves that none of these constructs induce chemotactic behaviour. In terms of both Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus, the lack of CheZ results in the inability of CheY dephosphorylation and the swimming motion observed in chemotaxis, which is a key driver in directed movement towards an attractant (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). Although the RBS CheZ Venus construct constitutively expresses CheZ, and bacterial swimming is achieved through CheY dephosphorylation, the expression levels remain constant regardless of the presence or absence of theophylline. Random movement will occur as a result.

The Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus and Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus transformants, with chemotaxis indices of 230 and 175 respectively, both indicated a significantly higher number of bacteria that travelled to the 2mM theophylline solution in the capillary tube compared to that of the control.

References

Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am ChemSoc, 129, 6807-11

Back to top

@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 			</li>
 			<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:WITS-CSIR_SA/Parts">Parts submitted</a></li>
+<li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:WITS-CSIR_SA/Characterization">Data</a></li>
 			<li><a href="./" class="dir">Outreach</a>
 				<ul>
@@ Line 161: / Line 163: @@
                     Characterization of Parts</h1>
-<p>In order to characterize our final machines, we performed the following assays:</p>
+<p>In order to characterize our two theophylline riboswitches and our atrazine riboswitch, we performed the following assays:</p>
+<center>
+<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
+<tr>
+<td width="150"><center> <a href="#Fluorometry"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9b/Data_banner1.gif" width="120" /></a></center></td>
+<td width="150"><center> <a href="#Microscopy1"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/5d/Data_banner2.gif" width="120" /></a></center></td>
+<td width="150"><center> <a href="#Microscopy2"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e6/Data_banner3.gif" width="120" /></a></center></td>
+<td width="150"><center> <a href="#Motility"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c5/Data_banner4.gif" width="120" /></a></center></td>
+<td width="150"><center> <a href="#Chemotaxis"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/18/Data_banner5.gif" width="120" /></a></center></td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td valign="top"><center><a href="#Fluorometry">Fluorometry</a></center></td>
+<td valign="top"> <center><a href="#Microscopy1">Fluorescence <br>microscopy: <br>Liquid Culture</a><br/></center></td>
+<td valign="top"><center><a href="#Microscopy2">Fluorescence <br>microscopy: <br>Smeared Culture</a><br/></center> </td>
+<td valign="top"> <center><a href="#Motility">Motility</a><br/></center></td>
+<td valign="top"> <center><a href="#Chemotaxis">Chemotaxis</a><br/></center></td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+</center>
-<a href="#Fluorometry">Fluorometry</a>
-<br/>
-<a href="#Microscopy">Fluorescence microscopy</a>
-<br/>
-<a href="#Motility">Motility</a>
-<br/>
-<a href="#Chemotaxis">Chemotaxis</a>
-<br/>
 <p id="Fluorometry">
 <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Fluorometry'">
 <h2>Theophylline Riboswitches</h2>
-<p>To characterise the theophylline riboswitches (1 and 2), we quantified their activation at different theophylline concentrations (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM and 2 mM) over a period of time using fluorometry. Competent <i>E. coli</i> (strain DH5a) cells were transformed with plasmid vectors containing the riboswitch and were cultured until the mid-log phase of growth. Thereafter, a different concentration of theophylline was added to each culture for induction. The activation of the riboswitch was detected as a fluorescent response as a result of increased translation of the fluorescent fusion protein CheZ-Venus, in the presence of the activator. A Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer was used to excite the cultures at 514 nm and the intensity of the emission peak was detected at 528 nm. Twenty readings were taken every 15 minutes for each culture, for a total period of 135 minutes. An empty vector was used to correct for autofluorescence. Conversely, a construct that comprised of a Promoter-RBS-CheZ-Venus-double terminator (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) was used as a positive control. Fluorescent data for the 3D plots (Fig 1-4) were corrected for autofluorescence by subtracting the fluorescent values of the cultures transformed with the empty vector, from that of the riboswitches.
+<p>To characterise the theophylline riboswitches (1 and 2), we quantified their activation at different theophylline concentrations (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM and 2 mM) over a period of time using fluorometry. Competent <i>E. coli</i> (strain DH5a) cells were transformed with plasmid vectors containing the riboswitch and were cultured until the mid-log phase of growth. Thereafter, a different concentration of theophylline was added to each culture for induction. The activation of the riboswitch was detected as a fluorescent response as a result of increased translation of the fluorescent fusion protein CheZ-Venus, in the presence of the activator. A Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer was used to excite the cultures at 514 nm and the intensity of the emission peak was detected at 528 nm. Twenty readings were taken every 15 minutes for each culture, for a total period of 135 minutes. An empty vector was used to correct for autofluorescence. Conversely, a construct that comprised of a RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) was used as a positive control. Fluorescent data for the 3D plots (Fig 1-4) were corrected for autofluorescence by subtracting the fluorescent values of the cultures transformed with the empty vector, from that of the riboswitches.
 </p>
@@ Line 183: / Line 200: @@
 <br>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_A.jpg"
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4c/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_A.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4c/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V.jpg'">
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_A.jpg"
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4c/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="650" /></a>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="750" /></a></center>
-<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/79/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_B.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/79/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_B.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/79/Flourometry_RS1_ChZ_V_B.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="645" /></a></center>
@@ Line 198: / Line 212: @@
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p> <b>Figure 1:</b> The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein under the regulation of theophylline riboswitch 1 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The fluorescence increased over time, with an increasing concentration of theophylline, indicating the theophylline concentration-dependent expression of the CheZ-Venus fluorescent fusion protein. The fluorescence peaks 105 minutes after the addition of 1 mM theophylline. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1 mM theophylline after 105 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1 mM theophylline). 1 mM of theophylline induced the expression of CheZ-Venus to increase 4-fold after 105 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 105 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values) (Click to enlarge)
+<td><p> <b>Figure 1:</b> The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein from construct Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The fluorescence increased over time, with an increasing concentration of theophylline, indicating the theophylline concentration-dependent expression of the CheZ-Venus fluorescent fusion protein. The fluorescence peaks 105 minutes after the addition of 1 mM theophylline. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1 mM theophylline after 105 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1 mM theophylline). 1 mM of theophylline induced the expression of CheZ-Venus to increase 8-fold after 105 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 105 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)
 </p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
@@ Line 207: / Line 221: @@
 <br>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/af/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_A.jpg"
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c3/Flourometry_RS1_V.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/af/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_A.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 2',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c3/Flourometry_RS1_V.jpg'">
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/af/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_A.jpg"
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/c/c3/Flourometry_RS1_V.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="650" /></a>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="750" /></a></center>
-<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fb/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_B.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fb/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_B.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fb/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V_B.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="645" /></a></center>
@@ Line 221: / Line 230: @@
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p>
+<td><p> <b>Figure 2:</b> The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein from the Riboswitch 1 Venus construct (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>). <b>A)</b> The fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 75 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, compared to riboswitch  1, which contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. The maximum fluorescent intensity observed was also lower by a factor of 2 RFU. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 75 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 8-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 75 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). This fold change is comparable to that described in <b>Figure 1</b>. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)
-<b>Figure 2:</b> The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein under the regulation of theophylline riboswitch 2 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>). <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The same trend of increased switch activation over time, with increasing theophylline concentrations was seen as with theophylline riboswitch 1. However, with the theophylline riboswitch 2, the fluorescence peaks 135 minutes after the addition of 1.5 mM theophylline. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1.5 mM theophylline after 135 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1.5 mM theophylline). 1.5 mM of theophylline induced a 37-fold increase in CheZ-Venus expression after 135 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 135 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+</p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 232: / Line 241: @@
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a6/Flourometry_RS1_V_A.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a6/Flourometry_RS1_V_A.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a6/Flourometry_RS1_V_A.jpg"
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0b/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="650" /></a>
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 3',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0b/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V.jpg'">
-<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Flourometry_RS1_V_B.jpg"
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0b/Flourometry_RS2_ChZ_V.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Flourometry_RS1_V_B.jpg'">
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="750" /></a></center>
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Flourometry_RS1_V_B.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="645" /></a></center>
@@ Line 245: / Line 252: @@
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p> <b>Figure 3:</b> The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein under the regulation of theophylline riboswitch 1 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>). <b>A)</b> The fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 75 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, compared to riboswitch  1, which contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. The maximum fluorescent intensity observed was also lower by a factor of 2 RFU. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 75 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 4.5-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 75 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). This fold change is comparable to that described in <b>Figure 1</b>. (Click to enlarge)
+<td><p>
-</p>  </td>
+<b>Figure 3:</b> The fluorescence of the CheZ-Venus fusion protein from the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) construct. <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch over time at different concentrations of theophylline. The same trend of increased switch activation over time, with increasing theophylline concentrations was seen as with theophylline riboswitch 1. However, with the theophylline riboswitch 2, the fluorescence peaks 135 minutes after the addition of 1.5 mM theophylline. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 1.5 mM theophylline after 135 minutes incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 1.5 mM theophylline). 1.5 mM of theophylline induced a 46-fold increase in CheZ-Venus expression after 135 minutes (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 135 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 253: / Line 260: @@
 <br>
 <br>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/07/Flourometry_RS2_V.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 4',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/07/Flourometry_RS2_V.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/07/Flourometry_RS2_V.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="750" /></a></center>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/74/Flourometry_RS2_V_A.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/74/Flourometry_RS2_V_A.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/7/74/Flourometry_RS2_V_A.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="650" /></a>
-<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS2_V_B.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS2_V_B.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/f/fe/Flourometry_RS2_V_B.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="645" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p> <b>Figure 4:</b> The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein under the regulation of the theophylline riboswitch 2 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>). <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch was affected by the lack of the CheZ gene in the switch construct. The increase in fluorescence was minimal upon induction and incubation over time. Furthermore, the fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 60 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, when compared to the theophylline riboswitch 2 that contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 60 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 2-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 60 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values) . This is far less than the value described for the same switch in <b>Figure 2</b>.(Click to enlarge)
+<td><p> <b>Figure 4:</b> The fluorescence of the Venus reporter protein the Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>) construct. <b>A)</b> The activation of the riboswitch was affected by the lack of the CheZ gene in the switch construct. The increase in fluorescence was minimal upon induction and incubation over time. Furthermore, the fluorescent peak occurred prematurely after 60 minutes of incubation with 0.5 mM theophylline, when compared to the theophylline riboswitch 2 that contained the gene for the CheZ-Venus fusion protein. <b>B)</b> The maximum fluorescence detected was compared to negative and positive controls at 0.5 mM theophylline after 60 minutes of incubation, and to that of baseline levels (0 minutes with 0.5 mM theophylline). A 2-fold increase in protein expression was observed as the maximum (fold change was calculated by dividing the fluorescence observed at 60 minutes by the fluorescence at 0 minutes, after subtracting the corresponding autofluorescence values) . This is far less than the value described for the same switch in <b>Figure 2</b>. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05.(Click to enlarge)
 </p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
@@ Line 281: / Line 288: @@
-Both the theophylline riboswitches displayed activation in response to increasing theophylline concentrations and incubation times. Theophylline riboswitch 2 controlling CheZ-Venus expression (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) clearly showed a superior level of activation compared to that theophylline riboswitch 1 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). This was expected as it was selected by FACS for its optimised expression platform that allows for minimal leakiness at basal levels, and a strong activation in the presence of theophylline (Lynch and Gallivan, 2009).  The activation shown by both the riboswitches regulating CheZ-Venus expression should be able to restore the motility of <i>E. coli</i> cells deficient in CheZ, in the presence of theophylline. More importantly, the theophylline concentration-dependent increase in CheZ-Venus expression alludes to the ability of directed cell movement, that is moving up concentration gradients of theophylline (Topp and Gallivan, 2007). Interestingly, the data suggests that the presence of the CheZ gene, as part of the CheZ-Venus fusion sequence, enhances the activation of the switches when compared to the constructs with venus alone. This may be due to some sort of structural stability conferred by the presence of the CheZ sequence.</P>
+<p>Both the theophylline riboswitches displayed activation in response to increasing theophylline concentrations and incubation times. Theophylline riboswitch 2 controlling CheZ-Venus expression (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) clearly showed a superior level of activation compared to that theophylline-controlled riboswitch 1 (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). This was expected as it was selected by FACS for its optimised expression platform that allows for minimal leakiness at basal levels, and a strong activation in the presence of theophylline (Lynch and Gallivan, 2009).  The activation shown by both the riboswitches regulating CheZ-Venus expression should be able to restore the motility of <i>E. coli</i> cells deficient in CheZ, in the presence of theophylline. More importantly, the theophylline concentration-dependent increase in CheZ-Venus expression alludes to the ability of directed cell movement, that is moving up concentration gradients of theophylline (Topp and Gallivan, 2007). Interestingly, the data suggests that the presence of the CheZ gene, as part of the CheZ-Venus fusion sequence, enhances the activation of the switches when compared to the constructs with venus alone. This may be due to some sort of structural stability conferred by the presence of the CheZ sequence.</p>
-<h2> Atrazine Riboswitch</h2>
-<p>Preliminary activation data was obtained for the atrazine riboswitch.Fluorometry was performed on <i>E. coli</i> (DH5a) cells transformed with a construct that contained a Promoter-atrazine riboswitch-mRFP-double terminator (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537014">BBa_K537014</a>). Similar to the theophylline riboswitches, different concentrations  (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, 2 mM) of atrazine were added to the cultures for induction. The cultures were excited at 584 nm and detected at 607 nm using a Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer. Readings were taken every 15 minutes for 120 minutes in total. The same empty vector was used as a negative control. The 3D plot data was normalised the same way as for the theophylline riboswitches.</p>
+<h2>Atrazine Riboswitch</h2>
+<p>Preliminary activation data was obtained for the atrazine riboswitch.Fluorometry was performed on <i>E. coli</i> (DH5a) cells transformed with a construct that contained a Atrazine Riboswitch mRFP(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537014">BBa_K537014</a>). Similar to the theophylline riboswitches, different concentrations  (0 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, 2 mM) of atrazine were added to the cultures for induction. The cultures were excited at 584 nm and detected at 607 nm using a Jasco FP-6300 spectrofluorometer. Readings were taken every 15 minutes for 120 minutes in total. The same empty vector was used as a negative control. The 3D plot data was normalised the same way as for the theophylline riboswitches.</p>
+<br>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b5/Flourometry_atRS_R.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 5',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b5/Flourometry_atRS_R.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/b5/Flourometry_atRS_R.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="750" /></a></center>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/58/Flourometry_atRS_R_A.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/58/Flourometry_atRS_R_A.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/58/Flourometry_atRS_R_A.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="650" /></a>
-<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ec/Flourometry_atRS_R_B.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ec/Flourometry_atRS_R_B.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/ec/Flourometry_atRS_R_B.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="620" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p> <b>Figure 5:</b> The fluorescence of the mRFP1 reporter protein under the regulation of the atrazine riboswitch(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537014">BBa_K537014</a>). <b>A)</b> The activation of the atrazine riboswitch at different atrazine concentrations over time. There was an increase in fluorescence as the atrazine concentration and incubation time increased. The amount of fluorescence detected was very small, with a maximum of 0.1 RFU detected after 75 minutes of incubation with 2 mM atrazine. <b>B)</b> The maximum was compared to the negative control at 75 minutes, 2 mM atrazine, and to that of fluorescent levels detected at basal levels (0 minutes, 2 mM atrazine). A 1.7-fold increase in expression of mRFP1 was observed over the 75 minute period (values used for the calculation had the corresponding negative control value subtracted first).(Click to enlarge)
+<td><p> <b>Figure 5:</b> The fluorescence of the mRFP1 reporter protein under the regulation of the atrazine riboswitch(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537014">BBa_K537014</a>) construct. <b>A)</b> The activation of the atrazine riboswitch at different atrazine concentrations over time. There was an increase in fluorescence as the atrazine concentration and incubation time increased. The amount of fluorescence detected was very small, with a maximum of 0.1 RFU detected after 75 minutes of incubation with 2 mM atrazine. <b>B)</b> The maximum was compared to the negative control at 75 minutes, 2 mM atrazine, and to that of fluorescent levels detected at basal levels (0 minutes, 2 mM atrazine). A 1.7-fold increase in expression of mRFP1 was observed over the 75 minute period (values used for the calculation had the corresponding negative control value subtracted first).(Click to enlarge)
 </p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
@@ Line 303: / Line 308: @@
 </table>
-<br>
+<p><h2>References</h2>
-<br>
-<h2>References</h2>
 <p>Lynch, S. A. & Gallivan, J. P. 2009. A flow cytometry-based screen for synthetic riboswitches. Nucleic Acids Res, 37, 184-92.</p>
-<p>Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am Chem Soc, 129, 6807-11.</p>
+<p>Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am Chem Soc, 129, 6807-11.</p></p>
 </div>
 <a href="#Top">Back to top</a>
-<p id="Microscopy">
+<p id="Microscopy1">
-<div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title: 'Fluorescence Microscopy'">
+<div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title: 'Fluorescence Microscopy: Liquid Culture'">
 <h2>Epi-fluorescence Wide-Field Microscopy</h2>
@@ Line 324: / Line 323: @@
 </p>
-<p> Bacterial culture and Manipulation:
+<p> 200 µl of each bacterial culture sample was imaged using a Zeiss Axioscope (Andor EMCCD Camera, Till Photonics Polychrome V)in microscopic plates.</p>
-</p>
-<p> 4 ml of LB broth with Ampicillin was inoculated from colonies off a master plate of positive clones and grown overnight at 37°C in a shaking incubator. 2 ml of each bacterial culture was then used to inoculate 25 ml of LB broth with Ampicillin and grown for ± 3 hours in a shaking incubator at 37°C until the cells reached an OD600 of 0.55 (mid-log phase). 2 x 5 ml of each sample culture was aliquoted into separate 15 ml falcon tubes. One tube was left untreated; 150 µl of 15 mM theophylline was added to the other (to make a final concentration of 1.5mM theophylline). These 5 ml aliquots were placed in a shaking incubator at 37°C for 30 min each to allow for activation. 200 µl of each treated and untreated sample was then used in a microscope plate for imaging. Imaging was done using Zeiss Axioscope (Andor EMCCD Camera, Till Photonics Polychrome V).
+<p> Widefield fluorescence microscopy was used to assess the expression of the Venus protein. The bacterial samples were excited at 500 nm using the polychrome as an excitation source. The fluorescence was then observed by capturing light in the emission spectrum of Venus (528 nm). Corresponding bright-field images (using white light) were also captured for each experiment. For a protocol of our methods, please click <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/be/Epifluorescence_protocol_edited.pdf">here</a>. </p>
-</p>
+<p>Below are the images that were obtained for the parental strain (BW25113) of the <i>E. coli</i> &Delta;CheZ- mutant (which served as the negative control) and the &Delta;CheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>).</p>
-<p> Widefield fluorescence microscopy was used to assess the expression of the Venus protein. The bacterial samples were excited at 500 nm using the polychrome as an excitation source. The fluorescence was then observed by capturing light in the emission spectrum of Venus (528 nm). The figure below represents a schematic of the imaging setup. Corresponding bright-field images (using white light) were also captured for each experiment.
-</p>
-<p>Below are the images that were obtained for the parental strain (BW25113) of the <i>E. coli</i> CheZ-deletion mutant, which served as the negative, and the CheZ deletion mutants transformed with Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 1-venus (thRS1-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) and Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 2-venus (thRS2-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>).
-</p>
 <p>Please note: Bacteria which were transformed with constructs which contained the CheZ gene were not tested in this assay. This experiment served as a means of observing the activation of the theophylline riboswitches, hence only expression of the venus reporter protein was needed for detection of fluorescence. Activation of motility was not assessed in this case – it was examined in the motility assays on semi-solid agar plates. Differences in fluorescence intensities were not calculated from the images below since the fluorometry experiments served as the quantitative approach to measurement of riboswitch activation.
 </p>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/12/Epifluorescence_parental.jpg"
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9e/Epifluorescence_new.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/12/Epifluorescence_parental.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 6',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9e/Epifluorescence_new.jpg'">
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/12/Epifluorescence_parental.jpg"
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/9/9e/Epifluorescence_new.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="580" /></a></center>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="700" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
@@ Line 347: / Line 342: @@
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 <td><p>
-<b>Figure 6:</b> The parental strain (BW25113) of the <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants were not transformed with any plasmid DNA. The brightfield images in the left column depict all bacterial cells. The venus images in the right column depict bacterial cells which emitted fluorescence. In both the absence and presence of theophylline, the parental bacteria did not fluoresce – which was the expected result. (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+<b>Figure 6:</b> Epifluorescence wide-field microscopy. The parental strain (BW25113) of the <i>E. coli</i> &Delta;CheZ  mutants were not transformed with any plasmid DNA (left panels). As expected, in both the absence and presence of theophylline, the parental bacteria did not fluoresce. <i>E. coli</i> &Delta;CheZ mutants which were transformed with the Riboswitch 1 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) expression construct (middle panel). In the absence of theophylline, almost no fluorescence occurred. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, many of the cells emitted fluorescence indicating activation of the theophylline riboswitch type 1.  <i>E.coli</i> CheZ-deletion mutants which were transformed with the Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>) expression construct. The brightfield images in the left column depict all bacterial cells. The venus images in the right column depict bacterial cells which emitted fluorescence. In the absence of theophylline, some fluorescence was observed. This result showed the leakiness of the riboswitch. A substantial amount of venus translation is permitted because of the flexible conformation of this riboswitch. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, much more fluorescence was detected. More venus was expressed in these cells due to the activation of the riboswitch via theophylline.(Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 355: / Line 350: @@
 <br>
+</div>
+<a href="#Top">Back to top</a>
+<p id="Microscopy2">
+<div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title: 'Fluorescence Microscopy: Smeared Culture'">
+<p> Fluorescent imaging was performed again after the European Jamboree, using a different technique. For a protocol of our "smeared culture" methods, please click <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/bb/Fluorescence_Microscopy_SMEARED.pdf">here</a>. The aim of this data is to depict the exact same brightfield and fluorescent static fields of view.
+</p>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/15/New_epifluorescence_newFigure1.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 7',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/15/New_epifluorescence_newFigure1.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/1/15/New_epifluorescence_newFigure1.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0a/Epifluorescence_RS1_V.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0a/Epifluorescence_RS1_V.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/0a/Epifluorescence_RS1_V.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="600" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p>
+<td><p> <b>Figure 7: </b> The parental untransformed CheZ deletion mutant strain serves as the negative control, displaying a lack of fluorescence in both the absence and presence of theophylline. The RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) construct serves as a positive control with constituitive expression of the CheZ protein, irrespective of theophylline. (Click to enlarge)
-<b>Figure 7:</b> <i>E. coli</i> CheZ-deletion mutants which were transformed with the Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 1-venus (thRS1-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) construct. The brightfield images in the left column depict all bacterial cells. The venus images in the right column depict bacterial cells which emitted fluorescence. In the absence of theophylline, almost no fluorescence occurred. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, many of the cells emitted fluorescence showing activation of the theophylline riboswitch type 1.(Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+</p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 377: / Line 379: @@
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Epifluorescence_RS2_V.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Epifluorescence_RS2_V.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d2/Epifluorescence_RS2_V.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="600" /></a></center>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/61/New_epifluorescence_Figure3.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 7',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/61/New_epifluorescence_Figure3.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/6/61/New_epifluorescence_Figure3.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
+<LB>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3f/New_epifluorescence_riboswitch2.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 8',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3f/New_epifluorescence_riboswitch2.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3f/New_epifluorescence_riboswitch2.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
+<br>
+<br>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
 <tr>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
-<td><p>
+<td><p> <b>Figure 8: </b> Theophylline-mediated activation of gene expression using riboswitches type 1 and 2: Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>), Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>), Riboswitch 1 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) (Click to enlarge)
-<b>Figure 8:</b> <i>E.coli</i> CheZ-deletion mutants which were transformed with the Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 2-venus (thRS2-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>) construct. The brightfield images in the left column depict all bacterial cells. The venus images in the right column depict bacterial cells which emitted fluorescence. In the absence of theophylline, some fluorescence was observed. This result showed the leakiness of the riboswitch. A substantial amount of venus translation is permitted because of the flexible conformation of this riboswitch. Upon the addition of theophylline at a concentration of 1.5 mM, much more fluorescence was detected. More venus was expressed in these cells due to the activation of the riboswitch via theophylline.(Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+</p>  </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 402: / Line 415: @@
 <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Motility assay'">
-<p> Semi-solid agar plates containing different concentrations of theophylline (0mM, 0.5mM, 1.0mM and 1.5mM) were made. Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 1-CheZ-Venus-double terminator (thRS1-Ch-V)(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>), Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 2-CheZ-Venus-double terminator (thRS2-Ch-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>), Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 1-Venus-double terminator (thRS1-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) and Promoter-theophylline riboswitch 2-Venus-double terminator (thRS2-V) (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) were transformed into CheZ deletion mutants and grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.55). 1.5 µl of culture was plated into the centre of the plates containing the various concentrations of theophylline and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. This experiment was performed in triplicate. The protocol for this experiment can be found here.
+<p> Semi-solid agar plates containing different concentrations of theophylline (0mM, 0.5mM, 1.0mM and 1.5mM) were made. Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>), Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>), Riboswitch 1 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>) and Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) were transformed into &Delta;CheZ mutant <i>E.coli</i> and grown to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.55). 1.5 µl of culture was plated into the centre of the plates containing the various concentrations of theophylline and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. This experiment was performed in triplicate. The protocol for this experiment can be found <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/a/a8/Motility_Assay_Protocol.pdf">here</a>.
 </p>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg'">
+The Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus transformants did not travel from the point of inoculation for all concentrations of theophylline. The CheZ deletion mutants containing Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus travelled 0 mm at 0 mM theophylline and reached a maximum travelling distance of 5 mm at 1.5 mM theophylline. &Delta;CheZ <i>E.coli</i> transformed wuth the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus construct travelled 2 mm in the absence of theophylline. At a concentration of 1.5 mM theophylline, Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus travel 22mm from the point of inoculation </p>
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg"
-                        alt="Flowchart" width="550" /></a></center>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg"
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9 A and B',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg'">
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg"
+alt="Flowchart" width="400" /></a></center>
+<BR>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg"
+                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9 C and D',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg'">
+                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg"
+alt="Flowchart" width="400" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
@@ Line 413: / Line 436: @@
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 <td><p>
-<b>Figure 9:</b> The distance travelled by CheZ deletion mutants (mm) over a 24 hour period at 37°C on semi-solid agar plates containing different theophylline concentrations (mM)(Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+<b>Figure 9:</b> 85 mm semi-solid agar plates containing 1.0 mM theophylline showing the point of inoculation and distance travelled by the bacteria. <b>A)</b> Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase &Delta;CheZ mutant <i>E.coli</i> transformed with Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). There is evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation.<b>B)</b> Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> &Delta;CheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (control). Converse to <b>A</b>, there is no evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation <b>C)</b> Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants transformed with Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>). There is evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation. <b>D)</b> Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> &Delta;CheZ mutants transformed with Riboswitch 2 Venus. Converse to <b>C</b>, there is no evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 421: / Line 444: @@
 <br>
+<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg"
-The thRS1-V and thRS2-V transformants did not travel from the point of inoculation for all concentrations of theophylline. The CheZ deletion mutants containing thRS1-Ch-V travelled 0 mm at 0 mM theophylline and reached a maximum travelling distance of 5 mm at 1.5 mM theophylline. The thRS2-Ch-V containing CheZ deletion mutants travelled 2 mm in the absence of theophylline and at a concentration of 1.5 mM theophylline, were able to travel 22mm from the point of inoculation </p>
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 10',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg'">
+                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/Motility_graph.jpg"
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg"
+                        alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 10',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg'">
-                    <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/2/2e/Motility_result_A.jpg"
-alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
-<BR>
-<center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg"
-                    data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 10',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg'">
-                   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/5/53/Motility_result_B.jpg"
-alt="Flowchart" width="500" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
@@ Line 440: / Line 453: @@
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 <td><p>
-<b>Figure 10:</b> 85 mm semi-solid agar plates containing 1.0 mM theophylline showing the point of inoculation and distance travelled by the bacteria. <b>A)</b> Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants transformed with thRS1-Ch-V(<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>). There is evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation.<b>B)</b> Inoculation of 1.5 µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants transformed with thRS1-V. Converse to <b>A</b>, there is no evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation <b>C)</b> Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants transformed with thRS2-Ch-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>). There is evidence of movement of the bacteria from the point of inoculation. This can be observed as a faint halo surrounding the point of inoculation. <b>D)</b> Inoculation of 1.5µl of mid-log phase <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants transformed with thRS2-V. Converse to <b>C</b>, there is no evidence of movement of bacteria from the point of inoculation (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+<b>Figure 10:</b> The distance travelled by &Delta;CheZ mutant <i>E.coli</i>(mm) over a 24 hour period at 37°C on semi-solid agar plates containing different theophylline concentrations (mM). Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.001.(Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 447: / Line 460: @@
 <br>
 <br>
 <h3> Discussion and conclusion</h3>
-<p>The construct thRS1-Ch-V transformed into the CheZ deletion mutants are non-motile at a concentration of 0 mM theophylline, since in the absence of the activator, the riboswitch is sequestering the RBS and thus inhibiting the translation of CheZ (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). On the semi-solid agar plates containing theophylline, the motility of E.coli is evident, as the interaction of theophylline with the riboswitch enables the exposure of the RBS and the translation of the downstream CheZ, allowing for bacterial motility. The distance travelled by the bacteria transformed with the thRS1-Ch-V construct, from the start position (mm) in the presence of different concentrations of theophylline, is not significantly different (P=0.005). This indicates that the CheZ expression at 0.5 mM-1.5 mM is sufficient to allow the bacteria to move a distance of 5 mm. The construct thRS2-Ch-V transformed into the CheZ deletion mutants are slightly motile in the absence of theophylline, travelling 2mm over a 24 hour period indicating that this riboswitch is slightly leaky. Upon addition of 0.5 mM-1.5 mM theophylline, the bacteria were able to travel 20mm over a 24 hour period.</p>
+<p>The construct Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus transformed into the &Delta;CheZ bacteria are non-motile at a concentration of 0 mM theophylline, since in the absence of the activator, the riboswitch is sequestering the RBS and thus inhibiting the translation of CheZ (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). On the semi-solid agar plates containing theophylline, the motility of <i>E.coli</i> is evident, as the interaction of theophylline with the riboswitch enables the exposure of the RBS and the translation of the downstream CheZ, allowing for bacterial motility. The distance travelled by the bacteria transformed with the Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus construct, from the start position (mm) in the presence of different concentrations of theophylline, is not significantly different (P=0.005). This indicates that the CheZ expression at 0.5 mM-1.5 mM is sufficient to allow the bacteria to move a distance of 5 mm. The construct Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus transformed into the CheZ deletion mutants are slightly motile in the absence of theophylline, travelling 2mm over a 24 hour period indicating that this riboswitch is slightly leaky. Upon addition of 0.5 mM-1.5 mM theophylline, the bacteria were able to travel 20mm over a 24 hour period.</p>
-<p>The distance travelled from the start position by the CheZ deletion mutants containing the thRS2-Ch-V is significantly higher than that those with the thRS1-Ch-V construct. This can be explained by the high fold-increase in CheZ protein expression by this riboswitch, as shown by fluorometry. Theophylline riboswitch 1 has a lower fold increase in CheZ expression from 0 mM to 1.5 mM theophylline, compared to the increase shown by the theophylline riboswitch 2. Therefore, in order to achieve maximum motility under the control of theophylline, at concentrations of between 0.5 mM and 1.5 mM, theophylline riboswitch 2 should be used.</p>
+<p>The distance travelled from the start position by the CheZ deletion mutants containing the Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus construct is significantly higher than that those with the Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus construct. This can be explained by the high fold-increase in CheZ protein expression by this riboswitch, as shown by fluorometry (46-fold higher compared to 8-fold higher). Theophylline riboswitch 1 has a lower fold increase in CheZ expression from 0 mM to 1.5 mM theophylline, compared to the increase shown by the theophylline riboswitch 2. Therefore, in order to achieve maximum motility under the control of theophylline, at concentrations of between 0.5 mM and 1.5 mM, theophylline riboswitch 2 should be used.</p>
 <h2>References</h3>
 Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007.Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am ChemSoc, 129, 6807-11
-<p>Both the t1-V and t2-V constructs transformed into the CheZ deletion mutants are non-motile, each having travelled a distance of 0mm at all concentrations of theophylline (See A and B). This indicates that in the absence of the CheZ protein, the bacteria are non-motile (Topps and Gallivan, 2007).</p>
+<p>Both the Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus constructs transformed into the &Delta;CheZ mutant <i>E.coli</i> are non-motile, each having travelled a distance of 0mm at all concentrations of theophylline (See A and B). This indicates that in the absence of the CheZ protein, the bacteria are non-motile (Topps and Gallivan, 2007).</p>
 </div>
@@ Line 460: / Line 472: @@
 <p id="Chemotaxis">
 <div data-dojo-type="dijit.TitlePane" data-dojo-props="title:'Chemotaxis assay'">
-<p>In order to determine whether we had successfully engineered the <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants to chemotactically migrate towards theophylline, we performed a capillary assay. Bacteria transformed with thRS1-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>), thRS2-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>), RBS-Ch-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>), thRS1-Ch-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>) and thRS2-Ch-V (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) were grown to mid-log phase. Activation of chemotaxis was achieved by incubating the cultures with 1 mM theophylline prior to the assay. A 50 µl drop of each culture was then placed onto separate sterile surfaces and two capillary tubes were placed into each drop. The first capillary tube was a control, containing only PBS and 20 µM EDTA. The second tube contained PBS, 20 µM and 2mM theophylline. The two capillary tubes were suspended into each drop of culture for 30 minutes. A dilution series of the solutions in the tubes were plated and colonies counted after 12 hours.  Further details of this protocol can be found here.
+<p>In order to determine whether we had successfully engineered the <i>E. coli</i> CheZ deletion mutants to chemotactically migrate towards theophylline, we performed a capillary assay. Bacteria transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>), Riboswitch 2 Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>), RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>), Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>) and Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) were grown to mid-log phase. Activation of chemotaxis was achieved by incubating the cultures with 1 mM theophylline prior to the assay. A 50 µl drop of each culture was then placed onto separate sterile surfaces and two capillary tubes were placed into each drop. The first capillary tube was a control, containing only PBS and 20 µM EDTA. The second tube contained PBS, 20 µM and 2mM theophylline. The two capillary tubes were suspended into each drop of culture for 30 minutes. A dilution series of the solutions in the tubes were plated and colonies counted after 12 hours. Further details of this protocol can be found <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/a/ac/Capillary_assay_Protocol.pdf">here</a>.
 <br>
 <center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3c/Capillary_assay_figure.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3c/Capillary_assay_figure.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 11',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3c/Capillary_assay_figure.jpg'">
                     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/3c/Capillary_assay_figure.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="550" /></a></center>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="450" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
@@ Line 471: / Line 483: @@
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 <td><p>
-<b>Figure 12:</b> add text here (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+<b>Figure 11:</b> A graphic illustration of the chemotaxis "capillary" assay showing the apparatus, experiment and the determination of the <i>Chemotaxis Index</i> (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
@@ Line 480: / Line 492: @@
 <center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4e/Chemotaxis_figure_A.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4e/Chemotaxis_figure_A.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 12: Riboswitch 1',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4e/Chemotaxis_figure_A.jpg'">
                     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/4/4e/Chemotaxis_figure_A.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="550" /></a></center>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="450" /></a></center>
+</br>
 <center><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/aa/Chemotaxis_figure_B.jpg"
-                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 9',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/aa/Chemotaxis_figure_B.jpg'">
+                     data-dojo-type="dojox.image.Lightbox" data-dojo-props="group:'Characterization',title:'Figure 12: Riboswitch 2',href:'https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/aa/Chemotaxis_figure_B.jpg'">
                     <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/aa/Chemotaxis_figure_B.jpg"
-                         alt="Flowchart" width="550" /></a></center>
+                         alt="Flowchart" width="450" /></a></center>
 <table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10">
@@ Line 492: / Line 505: @@
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 <td><p>
-<b>Figure 13:</b> add text here (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
+<b>Figure 12:</b> The chemotaxis index of &Delta;CheZ <i>E. coli</i> transformed with Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus, Riboswitch 1 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>, <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a>, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>; upper graph); and transformed with Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus, Riboswitch 2 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>, <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>, and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>; lower graph). The Chemotaxis Index of 100 was established for controls <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537009">BBa_K537009</a> and <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537010">BBa_K537010</a>, indicating bacteria travelled equally towards 0mM and 2.0mM theophylline. This suggest no chemo-attraction towards theophylline. Interestingly, the same was observed for the positive control RBS CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537013">BBa_K537013</a>) which is always "on" for CheZ. Conversely, the chemotaxis index of 230 for Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537011">BBa_K537011</a>) and 175 for Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K537012">BBa_K537012</a>) suggested and increased movement towards 2.0mM theophylline, strongly indicating riboswitch-controlled chemo-attraction. Data is represented in triplicate ± SEM. * p < 0.05. (Click to enlarge)</p> </td>
 <td><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="15"></table></td>
 </tr>
 </table>
-<br>
 <br>
 <h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3>
-<p>Cells transformed with thRS1-V, thRS2-V and RBS-Ch-V all displayed an index of approximately 100, indicating the same number of bacteria moved towards the control (0mM theophylline) and the experiment (2mM theophylline) capillary tube. This proves that none of these constructs induce chemotactic behaviour.  In terms of both thRS1-V and thRS2-V, the lack of CheZ results in the inability of CheY dephosphorylation and the swimming motion observed in chemotaxis, which is a key driver in directed movement towards an attractant (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). Although the RBS-Ch-V construct constitutively expresses CheZ, and bacterial swimming is achieved through CheY dephosphorylation, the expression levels remain constant regardless of the presence or absence of theophylline.  Random movement will occur as a result.<p/>
+<p>Cells transformed with Riboswitch 1 Venus, Riboswitch 2 Venus and RBS CheZ Venus all displayed an index of approximately 100, indicating the same number of bacteria moved towards the control (0mM theophylline) and the experiment (2mM theophylline) capillary tube. This proves that none of these constructs induce chemotactic behaviour.  In terms of both Riboswitch 1 Venus and Riboswitch 2 Venus, the lack of CheZ results in the inability of CheY dephosphorylation and the swimming motion observed in chemotaxis, which is a key driver in directed movement towards an attractant (Topps and Gallivan, 2007). Although the RBS CheZ Venus construct constitutively expresses CheZ, and bacterial swimming is achieved through CheY dephosphorylation, the expression levels remain constant regardless of the presence or absence of theophylline.  Random movement will occur as a result.<p/>
-<p>The thRS1-Ch-V and thRS2-Ch-V transformants, with chemotaxis indices of 180 and 227 respectively, both indicated a significantly higher number of bacteria that travelled to the 2mM theophylline solution in the capillary tube compared to that of the control. The chemotaxis index of the thRS2-Ch-V construct is significantly higher (p=0.005) than that of thRS1-Ch-V, indicating that cells transformed with thRS2-Ch-V is more attracted to theophylline than thRS1-Ch-V. Should maximum chemotaxis towards theophylline be desired, thRS2-Ch-V would be the more suitable construct.</p>
+<p>The Riboswitch 1 CheZ Venus and Riboswitch 2 CheZ Venus transformants, with chemotaxis indices of 230 and 175 respectively, both indicated a significantly higher number of bacteria that travelled to the 2mM theophylline solution in the capillary tube compared to that of the control. </p>
 <h2>References</h2>
 Topp, S. & Gallivan, J. P. 2007. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA. J Am ChemSoc, 129, 6807-11

Team:WITS-CSIR SA/Characterization

From 2011.igem.org

Latest revision as of 23:03, 28 October 2011

Characterization of Parts

Theophylline Riboswitches

Atrazine Riboswitch

References

Epi-fluorescence Wide-Field Microscopy

Discussion and conclusion

References

Discussion and conclusion

References