Team:Paris Bettencourt/ComS diffusion
From 2011.igem.org
(7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<h2>Introduction to the system</h2> | <h2>Introduction to the system</h2> | ||
- | <p>When it faces | + | <p>When it faces nutrient restriction, <i>B.subtilis</i> has two ways of reacting. One is to <em>sporulate</em> in order to wait for better times and come back to "life" again. The second is the <em>competence</em> mechanism. In this state, <i>B.subtilis</i> tries to catch in the medium every piece of DNA around and make <em>homologous recombination</em> with its genome. It then divides a lot to give a chance to its new genotype to survive the harsh conditions.</p> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr textalign="center"> | <tr textalign="center"> | ||
- | <td align="center"><u><b>Fig1:</b></u> Schematics of the MeKS system <a href=" | + | <td align="center"><u><b>Fig1:</b></u> Schematics of the MeKS system <a href="">[1]</a></td> |
- | <td align="center"><u><b>Fig2:</b></u> Image of a mix between sporulated and competent <br /> state during the steady state phase. <a href=" | + | <td align="center"><u><b>Fig2:</b></u> Image of a mix between sporulated and competent <br /> state during the steady state phase. <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/ComS_diffusion#references">[1]</a></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<p>The choice between these two mechanisms is controled by a bistable system known as <em>the MeKS system</em>. This system is usually stochastically controled by the apparition of ComS proteins in the cell. ComS inhibits the MecA protease and allows the ComK protein to self-amplify. But as ComK inhibits the production of ComS, the system comes back to the original state within a few hours.</p> | <p>The choice between these two mechanisms is controled by a bistable system known as <em>the MeKS system</em>. This system is usually stochastically controled by the apparition of ComS proteins in the cell. ComS inhibits the MecA protease and allows the ComK protein to self-amplify. But as ComK inhibits the production of ComS, the system comes back to the original state within a few hours.</p> | ||
- | <p>A comprehensive study of this phenomenon has been conducted by M. Elowitz and al. <a href=" | + | <p>A comprehensive study of this phenomenon has been conducted by M. Elowitz and al. <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/ComS_diffusion#references">[1]</a>.</p> |
<h2>Idea behind the design</h2> | <h2>Idea behind the design</h2> | ||
- | <p>The idea behind this design is to pass ComS proteins through the nanotube. This protein is very small (40 amino-acids) and it is expected to pass quite efficiently. We also know from the M. elowitz paper <a href=" | + | <p>The idea behind this design is to pass ComS proteins through the nanotube. This protein is very small (40 amino-acids) and it is expected to pass quite efficiently. We also know from the M. elowitz paper <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/ComS_diffusion#references">[1]</a> that very few proteins are required to trigger the switch (around 200). This makes this system a very good candidate for what we want to do.</p> |
- | <p>We contacted M. Elowitz and he kindly | + | <p>We contacted M. Elowitz and he kindly sent us a strain containing a chromosomally integrated reporter that monitors the level of ComK and ComS produced by a cell (pComG-cfp/pComS-yfp). This construct could in theory directly be used as a receiver cell, but the MeKS system is known to be repressed in exponential phase. We explain later how to avoid this problem.</p> |
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<p>Explanation step by step:</p> | <p>Explanation step by step:</p> | ||
- | <p>In standard conditions, the ComK protein in late | + | <p>In standard conditions, the ComK protein in late exponential phase is destroyed by the protease MecA. In the emitter cell, the system is repressed because codY is active.</p> |
<center> | <center> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<h2>Problems linked to the growth phase</h2> | <h2>Problems linked to the growth phase</h2> | ||
- | <p>The MeKS system is a noise tolerent bi-stable system that regulates the competence of the cell. This system | + | <p>The MeKS system is a noise tolerent bi-stable system that regulates the competence of the cell. This system works in the stationary phase and is theoretically repressed during the exponential phase. We investigated the issue using computer assisted sequence homology analysis and found 3 locuses in which we expect protein CodY can bind. CodY is known to repress many genes of the steady state phase during the exponential phase.</p> |
<p>In order to avoid this problem, we have created a <i>B.subtilis</i> strain ∆CodY. This will allow the MeKS system to be active during the exponential growth phase, as well as thousands of stationnary phase genes. This mutation is not lethal although it reduces the growth speed significantly.</p> | <p>In order to avoid this problem, we have created a <i>B.subtilis</i> strain ∆CodY. This will allow the MeKS system to be active during the exponential growth phase, as well as thousands of stationnary phase genes. This mutation is not lethal although it reduces the growth speed significantly.</p> | ||
- | <p>A CodY- strain | + | <p>A CodY- strain was obtained thanks to Link Sonenshein (<a href="http://www.tufts.edu/sackler//facultyIntros/sonensheinA.html">link</a>) and this strain was crossed with the reporter strain from M. Elowitz's laboratory (<a href="http://www.elowitz.caltech.edu/index.html">link</a>) (see the paper: <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/ComS_diffusion#references">[2]</a>) using DNA extraction and competence of the late exponential phase competence.</p> |
- | <p>We sucessfully managed to get this strain. See the experiment page for details.</p> | + | <p>We sucessfully managed to get this strain. See the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Experiments/ComS_diffusion">experiment page</a> for details.</p> |
<h2>Modeling and experiments</h2> | <h2>Modeling and experiments</h2> | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
<p>To know more about what we have done on this system and in the experiments, we invite you to visit the corresponding <em>modeling</em> and <em>experiment</em> pages:</p> | <p>To know more about what we have done on this system and in the experiments, we invite you to visit the corresponding <em>modeling</em> and <em>experiment</em> pages:</p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/ComS_diffusion"> | + | <li><em><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/ComS_diffusion">Modelling</a></em></li> |
- | <li><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Experiments/ComS_diffusion">Experiments</a></li> | + | <li><em><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Experiments/ComS_diffusion">Experiments</a></em></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
+ | <div id="citation_box"> | ||
+ | <p id="references">References</p> | ||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li><i>An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation</i>, Gürol M. Süel, Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Louisa M. Liberman & Michael B. Elowitz, Letter to Nature, available <a href="http://www.elowitz.caltech.edu/publications/CompetenceExcitable.pdf">here</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><i>Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics Gürol M.</i>, Gürol M. Süel, Rajan P. Kulkarni, Jonathan Dworkin, Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Michael B. Elowitz, available <a href="http://www.elowitz.caltech.edu/publications/Tunability.pdf">here</a></li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<!-- PAGE FOOTER -- ITEMS FROM COLUMN ! HAVE BEEN MOVED HERE -- RDR --> | <!-- PAGE FOOTER -- ITEMS FROM COLUMN ! HAVE BEEN MOVED HERE -- RDR --> | ||
Line 150: | Line 156: | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
- | + | <div id="scroll_right"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/Diffusion"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e0/Arrow-right-big.png" style="width:100%;"></a><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/ComS_diffusion">ComS model</a></div> | |
- | <div id="scroll_right"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/Diffusion"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/e/e0/Arrow-right-big.png" style="width:100%;"></a><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Modeling/ComS_diffusion"> | + | |
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 00:45, 29 October 2011
The ComS diffusion system
Introduction to the system
When it faces nutrient restriction, B.subtilis has two ways of reacting. One is to sporulate in order to wait for better times and come back to "life" again. The second is the competence mechanism. In this state, B.subtilis tries to catch in the medium every piece of DNA around and make homologous recombination with its genome. It then divides a lot to give a chance to its new genotype to survive the harsh conditions.
Fig1: Schematics of the MeKS system [1] | Fig2: Image of a mix between sporulated and competent state during the steady state phase. [1] |
The choice between these two mechanisms is controled by a bistable system known as the MeKS system. This system is usually stochastically controled by the apparition of ComS proteins in the cell. ComS inhibits the MecA protease and allows the ComK protein to self-amplify. But as ComK inhibits the production of ComS, the system comes back to the original state within a few hours.
A comprehensive study of this phenomenon has been conducted by M. Elowitz and al. [1].
Idea behind the design
The idea behind this design is to pass ComS proteins through the nanotube. This protein is very small (40 amino-acids) and it is expected to pass quite efficiently. We also know from the M. elowitz paper [1] that very few proteins are required to trigger the switch (around 200). This makes this system a very good candidate for what we want to do.
We contacted M. Elowitz and he kindly sent us a strain containing a chromosomally integrated reporter that monitors the level of ComK and ComS produced by a cell (pComG-cfp/pComS-yfp). This construct could in theory directly be used as a receiver cell, but the MeKS system is known to be repressed in exponential phase. We explain later how to avoid this problem.
The design is summed up in the following picture:
Fig3: Schematic of the ComS design
How this design works
Explanation step by step:
In standard conditions, the ComK protein in late exponential phase is destroyed by the protease MecA. In the emitter cell, the system is repressed because codY is active.
Fig4: Step one, the system is repressed and there is no ComK.
A nanotube is etablished, some ComS diffuses from the first cell to the second one, and blocks the protease by affinity inhibtion. The ComK can start amplifying, and activates the ComG promoter.
Fig5: The ComK protein activates the ComG promoter.
The ComG promoter produces CFP that report the cell has entered the competence phase.
Fig6: Schematic of the simplified general principle of the ComS design
If the nanotube breaks, ComS starts to disapear. Several hours later the cell returns to its original state.
Problems linked to the growth phase
The MeKS system is a noise tolerent bi-stable system that regulates the competence of the cell. This system works in the stationary phase and is theoretically repressed during the exponential phase. We investigated the issue using computer assisted sequence homology analysis and found 3 locuses in which we expect protein CodY can bind. CodY is known to repress many genes of the steady state phase during the exponential phase.
In order to avoid this problem, we have created a B.subtilis strain ∆CodY. This will allow the MeKS system to be active during the exponential growth phase, as well as thousands of stationnary phase genes. This mutation is not lethal although it reduces the growth speed significantly.
A CodY- strain was obtained thanks to Link Sonenshein (link) and this strain was crossed with the reporter strain from M. Elowitz's laboratory (link) (see the paper: [2]) using DNA extraction and competence of the late exponential phase competence.
We sucessfully managed to get this strain. See the experiment page for details.
Modeling and experiments
To know more about what we have done on this system and in the experiments, we invite you to visit the corresponding modeling and experiment pages:
References
- An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation, Gürol M. Süel, Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Louisa M. Liberman & Michael B. Elowitz, Letter to Nature, available here
- Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics Gürol M., Gürol M. Süel, Rajan P. Kulkarni, Jonathan Dworkin, Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Michael B. Elowitz, available here