Team:Arizona State/Notebook/May
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Ethan ward (Talk | contribs) |
Ethan ward (Talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
+ | {{:Team:Arizona_State/Templates/main|title=Notebook: May|content= | ||
+ | | ||
== Thursday, May 5 == | == Thursday, May 5 == | ||
- | * | + | * Today we pitched our CRISPR idea to Dr. Wang (our faculty advisor). The main response was that it needs to be more accessible (how can we explain CRISPR to a non biologist?). |
- | + | ||
== Wednesday, May 11 == | == Wednesday, May 11 == | ||
- | * | + | * We discussed the CRISPR leader sequence- its conservation, as well as what activates / represses it. We know it is AT rich. Can we insert our own promoter? <small>note: for further information see section on [[:Team:Arizona State/Project/CRISPR#cas_gene_regulation|cas gene regulation]].</small> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
* How robust is CRISPR? | * How robust is CRISPR? | ||
* We need a proof of concept- GFP silencing | * We need a proof of concept- GFP silencing | ||
Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
== Thursday, May 12 == | == Thursday, May 12 == | ||
- | * | + | * There are problems with targeting essential genes- endogenous CRISPR inserts will be heavily selected against, especially any targeting antibiotic resistance. |
- | + | :* Does this project have only laboratory applications? | |
- | :* | + | * Some modeling ideas we also discussed: |
- | * | + | |
:* Target vital genes- how does the cell respond? | :* Target vital genes- how does the cell respond? | ||
:* Look at rate of transmission during replication | :* Look at rate of transmission during replication | ||
Line 29: | Line 26: | ||
== Monday, May 16 == | == Monday, May 16 == | ||
- | * | + | * More discussion of leader sequence- we should be able to insert our own lac promoter to express the ''cas'' genes and the CRISPR array. |
== Tuesday, May 17 == | == Tuesday, May 17 == | ||
- | * Finished semi-official proposal for project | + | * Finished semi-official proposal for project, as well as some form emails. |
- | + | * Our initial plasmid construction plan was considered- we will PCR our CAS genes incorporating appropriate restriction sites, while synthesizing the array. | |
- | * | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
== Wednesday, May 18 == | == Wednesday, May 18 == | ||
Line 44: | Line 38: | ||
* Which part of GFP gene do we put in our 32bp spacers? Does it matter? | * Which part of GFP gene do we put in our 32bp spacers? Does it matter? | ||
* Are we targeting DNA or RNA? | * Are we targeting DNA or RNA? | ||
- | :* DNA: CAS, much more literature | + | :* DNA: CAS, much more literature- we know more about the mechanism and have a much greater chance of success. |
- | ::* How do we get GFP to stay in the cell if we target it with CRISPR? | + | ::* How do we get GFP to stay in the cell if we target it with CRISPR? We will need to use a separate plasmid, but without the antibiotic selection mechanism the cells will die. |
- | + | :* RNA: There are only a few papers in the literature about this{{:Team:Arizona State/Templates/ref|27}}, and RNA targeting has not been demonstrated in very many organisms (only 1, in fact). | |
- | :* RNA: | + | |
+ | == Thursday, May 19 == | ||
+ | * A preliminary budget was put together, based on some data from other teams. We also prepared for a meeting with the deans of the engineering school on Friday. | ||
== Friday, May 20 == | == Friday, May 20 == | ||
- | * | + | * Dr. Wang came in this morning, and today we are joined by Abhinav, a BME undergrad in his lab |
- | * DNA method: we can examine the fluorescence curve (flow cytometry) when we add in the GFP plasmid. | + | * DNA targeting method: we can examine the fluorescence curve (flow cytometry) when we add in the GFP plasmid. |
- | :* If it takes a while to decrease, we can then examine what it looks like when CRISPR is added and have a point of comparison. However, if it attenuates quickly, this isn't really an option for us | + | :* If it takes a while to decrease, we can then examine what it looks like when CRISPR is added and have a point of comparison. However, if it attenuates quickly, this isn't really an option for us. |
* Backups: we need to have more genes to target than just NDM-1 | * Backups: we need to have more genes to target than just NDM-1 | ||
:* Multiple: target a cluster of genes that code for parts of a characteristic | :* Multiple: target a cluster of genes that code for parts of a characteristic | ||
- | ::* To inhibit the entire characteristic, we would have to silence A, B, and C ( | + | ::* To inhibit the entire characteristic, we would have to silence A, B, and C (logic gate). |
* Other ideas: | * Other ideas: | ||
:* Motility (csgA) | :* Motility (csgA) | ||
:* Synechocystis (cyanobacteria that is big at ASU) | :* Synechocystis (cyanobacteria that is big at ASU) | ||
:* Biobrick with AND gate (need 1-1) | :* Biobrick with AND gate (need 1-1) | ||
- | :* Origin of replication | + | :* Origin of replication; preventing horizontal gene transfer |
== Tuesday, May 31 == | == Tuesday, May 31 == | ||
- | * | + | * This was our first official day in the lab. We received two strains of E. coli from life sciences, MG1655 and BL21. BL21 has no native cas genes and will be ideal for testing our constructs. |
- | + | * Made 4 plates from this source plate (2 for each strain) | |
- | + | }} | |
- | + | ||
- | * Made 4 plates from this source plate (2 each strain) | + |
Latest revision as of 05:27, 28 September 2011
|
Thursday, May 5
Wednesday, May 11
Thursday, May 12
Monday, May 16
Tuesday, May 17
Wednesday, May 18
Thursday, May 19
Friday, May 20
Tuesday, May 31
|