Team:Cornell/Safety

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 24: Line 24:
'''Safety of BioBricks''' <br>
'''Safety of BioBricks''' <br>
-
None of the BioBricks submitted to the registry raised any safety issues.  They are GFP, RFP VIOA, VIOB and VIOE attached to avitags.  Our last BioBrick part causes cells to lyse in the precence of green light.  This should not cause any safety concerns.
+
None of the BioBricks submitted to the registry raised any safety issues.  They are GFP, RFP VIOA, VIOB and VIOE attached to avitags.  Our last BioBrick part causes cells to lyse in the precence of green light.  This should not cause any safety concerns. <br>
 +
 
 +
==Biosafety Provisions==
'''Biosafety at Cornell''' <br>
'''Biosafety at Cornell''' <br>
We complied with Weill hall’s safety requirements in gaining access to lab space, as well as in use of the lab. Scott D. Emr is the director of Weill Hall which is where our lab was located.
We complied with Weill hall’s safety requirements in gaining access to lab space, as well as in use of the lab. Scott D. Emr is the director of Weill Hall which is where our lab was located.

Revision as of 21:46, 17 August 2011

Modo Software | Lysis Scene | Construction Scene | Trailer


Safety

Safety to both scientists and the general public is of utmost importance to anyone working in the synthetic biology field. We stringently followed all relevant safety protocol as well as choosing the safest procedures and materials to work with.

Material Safety

Researcher Safety
We were able to avoid the use of any toxic chemicals. We used syberSafe during PCR. Exposure to UV light during viewing of gels and PCR were minimized through the use of safety masks. Gloves were used with handling chemicals.


Each member of our lab was required to complete two online safety courses; Lab Safety and Chemical Disposal. Additionally, we attended a safety orientation from our lab manager. While in the lab, all members complied with safely regulations such as the use of gloves when handling chemical and the use of goggles when (constructing our microfluidics device). We were able to avoid the use of any toxic chemicals. We used syberSafe during PCR. Exposure to UV light during viewing of gels and PCR were minimized through the use of safety masks.

Public Safety
Our projects presented little to no risk to public health or safety. Our E. coli strains are non-pathogenic. Our bio-chemical pathway converts tryptophan to prodeoxyviolacein. Both chemicals and all intermediates are non-toxic. We chose this pathway because tryptophan is both common and harmless to public safety.

Environmental Safety
Our E. coli lab strain is not able to survive outside the lab and were disposed of safely. Our project also poses no identifiable threat to environmental safety. All bio-hazardous chemicals were disposed of by following the proper regulations.

Security Risk
There are no real threats that can be created from our project since our final product is non-harmful. A person with malicious intent could possibly create a biochemical pathway that creates a harmful product but such technology is already widely known and out of our control.

Safety of BioBricks
None of the BioBricks submitted to the registry raised any safety issues. They are GFP, RFP VIOA, VIOB and VIOE attached to avitags. Our last BioBrick part causes cells to lyse in the precence of green light. This should not cause any safety concerns.

Biosafety Provisions

Biosafety at Cornell
We complied with Weill hall’s safety requirements in gaining access to lab space, as well as in use of the lab. Scott D. Emr is the director of Weill Hall which is where our lab was located.