Team:UPO-Sevilla/Project/Improving Flip Flop/asRNA/Conclusions

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<html>
<html>
 +
 +
<script type="text/javascript">
 +
            ddmenuactual = 1;
 +
            $("#menuPImproved").addClass("TopMenuSelected");
 +
</script>
                     <div id="principal">
                     <div id="principal">
                         <div class="main">
                         <div class="main">
Line 18: Line 23:
                             <h1>Conclusions</h1>
                             <h1>Conclusions</h1>
                              
                              
-
                             <p>In the same way as with the proteolysis system, here we are repressing both State 2 reporter and State 1 repressor when State 1 is the dominant. The conclusions of this mechanism are the same that with proteolysis: RFP residual signals will be minimized while PcI expression will be enhanced, as it won’t be repressed. By doing this, we will shorten the switching time between states and obtain the clearest signal difference.</p>  
+
                             <p>In the same way as with the proteolysis system, here we are <strong>repressing</strong> both <strong>State 2 reporter</strong> and <strong>State 1 repressor</strong> when State 1 is the dominant. The conclusions of this mechanism are the same that with proteolysis: <strong>RFP residual signal</strong> will be <strong>minimized</strong> while <strong>PcI expression</strong> will be <strong>enhanced</strong>, as it won’t be repressed. By doing this, we will <strong>shorten the switching time</strong> between states and obtain the <strong>clearest signal difference</strong>.</p>  
                         </div>
                         </div>
                         <div class="left">
                         <div class="left">
-
                               </html>{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/leftTemplateProject}}<html>
+
                               </html>{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/leftTemplateProjectImproved}}<html>
 +
 
 +
                              <script type="text/javascript">
 +
                                          $("#menuVIRConclusions").addClass("menuSelected");
 +
                              </script>
                         </div>
                         </div>
</html>
</html>
{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/footTemplate}}
{{:Team:UPO-Sevilla/footTemplate}}

Latest revision as of 22:17, 27 October 2011

Grey iGEM Logo UPO icon

Conclusions

In the same way as with the proteolysis system, here we are repressing both State 2 reporter and State 1 repressor when State 1 is the dominant. The conclusions of this mechanism are the same that with proteolysis: RFP residual signal will be minimized while PcI expression will be enhanced, as it won’t be repressed. By doing this, we will shorten the switching time between states and obtain the clearest signal difference.