Team:Peking S/project/wire/matrix
From 2011.igem.org
(→Orthogonal activating matrix) |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===Orthogonal activating matrix=== | ===Orthogonal activating matrix=== | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | |||
- | + | Aiming at effective and discrete communications in a multicellular genetic network, orthogonality of the 'chemical wires' is essential. Thus we carried out a series of experiments checking the signaling orthogonality of 'chemical wires' in our toolbox. | |
+ | |||
+ | <center>[[File:signalingOrthogonal.png|450px]]</center> | ||
- | '''Table 1 Original Data of the activating matrix, showing absolute GFP fluorescence(a.u.)''' | + | ''Figure 1 A graphical representation of the relative activation fold associated with five receiver systems and their corresponding inducer.The concentration of salicylate is 10^-4 mol/L. LuxI product and RhlI product is 10 fold dilution of the supernatant from a overnight culture bearing pT7 controlled luxI generator and ptet controlled rhlI generator, respectively. The concentration of 3-oxododecyl-homoserine lactone(3OC12HSL) is 10^-8 mol/L, and the CinI product is 1:100 dilution of the overnight culture broth. '' |
+ | |||
+ | <center>'''Table 1 Original Data of the activating matrix, showing absolute GFP fluorescence(a.u.)''' | ||
[[File:SR_Matrix_table1.png|600px]] | [[File:SR_Matrix_table1.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
'''Table 2 Data of the activating matrix, average fold compared with blank samples calculated''' | '''Table 2 Data of the activating matrix, average fold compared with blank samples calculated''' | ||
[[File:SR_Matrix_table2.png|600px]] | [[File:SR_Matrix_table2.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
'''Table 3 Data of the activating matrix, activating fold normalized''' | '''Table 3 Data of the activating matrix, activating fold normalized''' | ||
[[File:SR_Matrix_table3.png|600px]]</center> | [[File:SR_Matrix_table3.png|600px]]</center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <a href="#top">Top↑ | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> |
Latest revision as of 01:13, 6 October 2011
Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/bannerhidden Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/back2
Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/bannerhidden
Chemical Wire Toolbox
Introduction|Harvesting ‘Chemical Wires’ From Nature|Synthesizing Quorum Sensing Inverters|Orthogonal Activating Matrix
Orthogonal activating matrix
Aiming at effective and discrete communications in a multicellular genetic network, orthogonality of the 'chemical wires' is essential. Thus we carried out a series of experiments checking the signaling orthogonality of 'chemical wires' in our toolbox.
Figure 1 A graphical representation of the relative activation fold associated with five receiver systems and their corresponding inducer.The concentration of salicylate is 10^-4 mol/L. LuxI product and RhlI product is 10 fold dilution of the supernatant from a overnight culture bearing pT7 controlled luxI generator and ptet controlled rhlI generator, respectively. The concentration of 3-oxododecyl-homoserine lactone(3OC12HSL) is 10^-8 mol/L, and the CinI product is 1:100 dilution of the overnight culture broth.
Table 2 Data of the activating matrix, average fold compared with blank samples calculated
Table 3 Data of the activating matrix, activating fold normalized