Latest revision as of 03:03, 22 September 2011

Introduction
Our Project
Tools
- Gibson Assembly
- MITOMI
Notebook
- Protocols
- May
- June
- July
- August
- September
- October
Considerations
- Human Practices
- Safety
Acknowledgements
- Sponsors
- Partners

Lysis Selection System

Lysis selection system Main | Lysis Characterization | DNA Recovery | DNA Selection | T7 Promoter Variants

One major challenge in designing new regulatory parts is to determine which combinations of transcription factors and binding sequences match. From previous research and our own MITOMI experiments, we know which DNA sequences TetR binds to, and which residues of TetR participate in binding, but we do not know how changing these residues will affect either binding affinity or specificity. Molecular dynamics simulations and other theoretical approaches have not come any closer to answering these questions. In short, we know too little about protein-DNA interaction to intelligently design transcription factors. To make up for this lack of knowledge, we present an experimental system to select valid binding pairs from many random tetR and pTet mutants, based on an inducible lysis gene.

The system – in a way a "survival of the weakest" – is related to directed evolution. A lysis system based on the K112808 lysis device is indirectly activated by tetR. Therefore, if in a given cell the tetR variant present can bind to the tetR promoter, the cell lyses and releases its DNA into the culture media. From there, DNA can be recovered and amplified, tranformed, or directly sequenced. By design, this DNA codes for a combination of TF and promoter with high mutual affinity, and therefore almost directly yields a valid regulatory part. In this light, it is a useful component of our transcription factor development pipeline.

This is a direct and practical way of solving the problem of selecting high affinity pairs among the millions of possible combinations of transcription factors and promoters. It can be seen as a form of DNA-based information processing, and is therefore also a neat example of a problem more efficiently solved by non-conventional computation.

To develop the system, we began with a simple experiment to check that a lysis cassette in a plasmid could lyse with greater efficiency as a function of IPTG concentration. The next step towards our goal was to demonstrate that plasmid DNA can be adequately recovered and repackaged (PCR amplified, transformed into a different strain, etc...) as a result of lysing. In a more elaborate experiment, we were able to show that not only did the lysing efficiently release plasmids from the cells, but that it could be made to do so selectively in a large culture containing a variety of strains. Finally, cognizant of the fact that a good lysis selection method ought to be flexible with regards to the larger reporter system, we manufactured twelve different T7 promoter variants that exhibit a wide range of strengths and induction efficiencies. The latter will play a crucial role in being able to accomodate the activation time-scales of fragile and complex selection systems.

All the components of the selection machine have been separately tested experimentally and found to work. Therefore we are convinced the system can work, but it would still require a full-circle experiment to demonstrate its usefulness.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Header|title=Lysis Selection System}}
+{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/T7lysisHeader|title=Intro}}
-'''Skip straight to:'''
+One major challenge in designing new regulatory parts is to determine which combinations of transcription factors and binding sequences match.
-|
+From previous research and our own MITOMI experiments, we know which DNA sequences TetR binds to, and which residues of TetR participate in binding, but we do not know how changing these residues will affect either binding affinity or specificity.
-* [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our Project/T7 promoter variants/platereader|Platereader Lysis Experiment]]: Using a platereader
+Molecular dynamics simulations and other theoretical approaches have not come any closer to answering these questions.
-* [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our Project/T7 promoter variants/dnarecov| DNA Recovery Experiment]]: Recovering DNA after lysis
+In short, we know too little about protein-DNA interaction to intelligently design transcription factors.
-* [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our Project/T7 promoter variants/dnaselect| DNA Selection Experiment]]: Selecting the right DNA
+To make up for this lack of knowledge, we present an experimental system to select valid binding pairs from many random tetR and pTet mutants, based on an inducible lysis gene.
-* [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our Project/T7 promoter variants/t7make| T7 Promoter Variants]]: Making and Characterizing of T7 promoter variants for Lysis
-=== DNA Recovery with Lysis ===
+[[File:EPFL-Solange-Lysis.jpg|700px]]
-Having a lysis cassette driven by a T7 promoter is an important step towards being able to recover the DNA sequences of transcription factor and promoter mutants that have strong mutual affinities. To verify that basic lysing can be
+The system – in a way a "survival of the weakest" – is related to directed evolution.
-induced, we use the same IPTG experiment as for RFP, using both large samples for visual, qualitative confirmation and small samples in a platereader for quantitative, numerical confirmation.
+A lysis system based on the K112808 lysis device is indirectly activated by tetR.
+Therefore, if in a given cell the tetR variant present can bind to the tetR promoter, the cell lyses and releases its DNA into the culture media.
+From there, DNA can be recovered and amplified, tranformed, or directly sequenced.
+By design, this DNA codes for a combination of TF and promoter with high mutual affinity, and therefore almost directly yields a valid regulatory part.
+In this light, it is a useful component of our transcription factor development pipeline.
+This is a direct and practical way of solving the problem of selecting high affinity pairs among the millions of possible combinations of transcription factors and promoters.
+It can be seen as a form of DNA-based information processing, and is therefore also a neat example of a problem more efficiently solved by non-conventional computation.
-Once the basic mechanism of cell lysing is confirmed, the next step is to show that DNA can be recovered from the supernatant. We grow two large cultures of cells. One contains cells that will lyse and release plasmids into the supernatant while the other has non-lysing, "normal" cells.
+To develop the system, we began with a [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our_Project/T7_promoter_variants/lysis|simple experiment]] to check that a lysis cassette in a plasmid could lyse with greater efficiency as a function of IPTG concentration. The next step towards our goal was to demonstrate that [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our_Project/T7_promoter_variants/recovery|plasmid DNA can be adequately recovered]] and repackaged (PCR amplified, transformed into a different strain, etc...) as a result of lysing. In a [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our_Project/T7_promoter_variants/selection|more elaborate experiment]], we were able to show that not only did the lysing efficiently release plasmids from the cells, but that it could be made to do so selectively in a large culture containing a variety of strains. Finally, cognizant of the fact that a good lysis selection method ought to be flexible with regards to the larger reporter system, we manufactured [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Our_Project/T7_promoter_variants/t7prom|twelve different T7 promoter variants]] that exhibit a wide range of strengths and induction efficiencies. The latter will play a crucial role in being able to accomodate the activation time-scales of fragile and complex selection systems.
-[[File:broth_noiptg.png]]
-Adding IPTG to both flasks induces lysis in one set of cells but not in the others.
-[[File:broth_iptg_induction.png]]
-Thanks to qPCR, the supernatant harvested from the lysing culture reveals increased numbers of plasmids while the non-lysing culture exhibits significantly lower numbers of plasmids. A similar test involves transforming the supernatant (whose plasmid content is not known a priori) into cells and counting the number of resulting colonies. The plates containing transformations from the lysing supernatant have vastly superior number of colonies compared to the non-lysing supernatant transformations.
-[[File:iptg_platecount_text.png|700px]]
-To round out the experiments for DNA recovery, it is essential that we show that the recovered DNA is in fact plasmid DNA from the relevant lysed cells. To that end, we again set up an experiment involving two flasks but this time each flask contains two cultures. For one flask, one culture is a co-transformation of a lysis plasmid and a RFP-containing plasmid and the other is a co-transformation of a negative control plasmid with a GFP-containing plasmid. In the other flask, the reverse is true: lysis is with GFP and negative control is with RFP.
-[[File:multiple_lysis_setup.png|700px]]
-Induction with IPTG lyses the cells with the lysis cassette but leaves the cells with the negative control free to produce the red fluorescence. Collecting the supernatant and sterile filtering it reveals, by qPCR or by transforming it and counting the colonies, that the supernatant contains RFP plasmids in one flask and GFP plasmids in the other. Meanwhile, the large flask from which the supernatant samples are taken should be yellow-green and pink respectively, since the remaining cells will fluoresce according to those colors.
-[[File:double_culture_induced_iptg.png|700px]]
+All the components of the selection machine have been separately tested experimentally and found to work. Therefore we are convinced the system can work, but it would still require a full-circle experiment to demonstrate its usefulness.
 {{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}