Team:Wageningen UR/Notebook/Proj2/March
From 2011.igem.org
(→March - Fungal Track 'n Trace) |
|||
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{:Team:Wageningen_UR/Templates/Header}} | {{:Team:Wageningen_UR/Templates/Header}} | ||
{{:Team:Wageningen_UR/Templates/NavigationTop1}} | {{:Team:Wageningen_UR/Templates/NavigationTop1}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== March - Fungal Track 'n Trace == | == March - Fungal Track 'n Trace == | ||
Line 42: | Line 51: | ||
'''March 8''' | '''March 8''' | ||
- | Research has to be done to find orthologs in Aspergillus and to make sure the genes we want to use are really present in Aspergillus. A decision has to be made about what kind of selection markers we are going to use. We are looking for an RFP variant which can be functionally expressed in Aspergillus. | + | Research has to be done to find orthologs in ''Aspergillus'' and to make sure the genes we want to use are really present in ''Aspergillus''. A decision has to be made about what kind of selection markers we are going to use. We are looking for an RFP variant which can be functionally expressed in ''Aspergillus''. |
Line 57: | Line 66: | ||
'''March 29''' | '''March 29''' | ||
- | There was some debate about whether we should work with Aspergillus nidulans or Aspergillus niger. Aspergillus nidulans is decided to be the best choice. | + | There was some debate about whether we should work with ''Aspergillus nidulans'' or ''Aspergillus niger''. ''Aspergillus nidulans'' is decided to be the best choice. |
Latest revision as of 20:23, 21 September 2011