Team:Lyon-INSA-ENS/Realisation/Week8
From 2011.igem.org
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<br/> <br/> | <br/> <br/> | ||
- | <br/ | + | <br/> |
- | + | ||
<div class="cadre" ; style="background-color:green;" > | <div class="cadre" ; style="background-color:green;" > | ||
Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | <p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | ||
- | 24 well plate with LB/2 or M63 medium to test bacterial adherence in response to cobalt :<br> | + | <b>24 well plate</b> with LB/2 or M63 medium to test bacterial adherence in response to cobalt :<br> |
- | positive control with an adherent strain PHL818 ( MG1655 malT::Tn10 adr101=OmpR234 ),negative control with a non adherent strain NM522, and our synthesized part Rcn-CsgBAEFG (Amp) with increasing concentrations of cobalt ( in CoCl2 form).<br> | + | positive control with an adherent strain PHL818 ( MG1655 malT::Tn10 adr101=OmpR234 ), negative control with a non adherent strain NM522, and our synthesized part Rcn-CsgBAEFG (Amp) with increasing concentrations of cobalt ( in CoCl2 form).<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Flocculation test for the same strains with LB/2 or M63 medium.<br> | + | <b>Flocculation test</b> for the same strains with LB/2 or M63 medium.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Miniprep of the transformed colonies with the following plasmids : Prcn / Pcurli-GFP / Pcurli - Operon curli.<br> | + | <b>Miniprep</b> of the transformed colonies with the following plasmids : Prcn / Pcurli-GFP / Pcurli - Operon curli.<br> |
-> none of the isolated clones had the Prcn or Pcurli-GFP plasmid, start of liquid culture of new clones.<br> | -> none of the isolated clones had the Prcn or Pcurli-GFP plasmid, start of liquid culture of new clones.<br> | ||
-> two clones had the Pcurli-curli operon part : storage in the collection <br> | -> two clones had the Pcurli-curli operon part : storage in the collection <br> | ||
Line 60: | Line 59: | ||
Revealing of the 24 well plate from the previous day, using 2 different methods : methyl violet (to visualise the formation of the biofilm at the surface of the well ) or direct OD600 measure.<br> | Revealing of the 24 well plate from the previous day, using 2 different methods : methyl violet (to visualise the formation of the biofilm at the surface of the well ) or direct OD600 measure.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Miniprep of the clones started the previous day <br> | + | <b>Miniprep</b> of the clones started the previous day <br> |
-> two clones have the Prcn part and one Pcurli-GFP.<br> | -> two clones have the Prcn part and one Pcurli-GFP.<br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 79: | Line 78: | ||
The flocculation tests from the previous day give better results in LB/2 compared to LB , but they're not significative. We'll use LB/2 for future tests.<br> | The flocculation tests from the previous day give better results in LB/2 compared to LB , but they're not significative. We'll use LB/2 for future tests.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | + | <b>Nanodrop</b> quantification of some plasmids in the collection.<br> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 90: | Line 89: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | <p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | ||
- | Start of new 24 well plates, to study: | + | Start of new <b>24 well plates</b>, to study: |
</p> | </p> | ||
<ul style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | <ul style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | ||
<li> the effect of cobalt (in increasing concentration), </il> | <li> the effect of cobalt (in increasing concentration), </il> | ||
- | <li> the difference between Amp or Cm strains, </il> | + | <li> the difference between Amp or Cm strains, -> it works better in Amp </il> |
- | <li> the effect of the presence of antibiotic</il> | + | <li> the effect of the presence of antibiotic, -> it works better with Antibiotic</il> |
- | <li> the effect of prior treatment of the plate with EDTA</li> | + | <li> the effect of prior treatment of the plate with EDTA, -> it is better when plate is rinse</li> |
- | <li> the effect of EDTA (in increasing concentration) on the strain. </il> | + | <li> the effect of EDTA (in increasing concentration) on the strain. -> no useful </il> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | <p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | ||
- | Characterization of OmpR234 with a 24 well plate and a flocculation test.<br> | + | Characterization of OmpR234 with a <b>24 well plate</b> and a flocculation test.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Test in CFA medium to show the formation of biofilms by colouring them red using the following strains( 10µL each ) :<br> | + | <b>Test in CFA medium</b> to show the formation of biofilms by colouring them red using the following strains( 10µL each ) :<br> |
PHL818 (positive control),NM522 (negative control), and test bacteria containing 18A promoter ( alone without the coding part ),our synthesized parts (Amp or Cm)<br> | PHL818 (positive control),NM522 (negative control), and test bacteria containing 18A promoter ( alone without the coding part ),our synthesized parts (Amp or Cm)<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Construction of Prcn-GFP(LVA).<br> | + | <b>Construction</b> of Prcn-GFP(LVA).<br> |
- | Digestion of the plasmid with Prcn (S+P) = linearization -> error: the part goes out from the plasmid <br> | + | <b>Digestion</b> of the plasmid with Prcn (S+P) = linearization -> error: the part goes out from the plasmid <br> |
-> use of other enzyme tubes, with the same results, same with a simple digestion -> our enzyme tubes are contaminated<br> | -> use of other enzyme tubes, with the same results, same with a simple digestion -> our enzyme tubes are contaminated<br> | ||
digestion of the plasmid with strong RRB-GFP (X+P) -> OK<br> | digestion of the plasmid with strong RRB-GFP (X+P) -> OK<br> | ||
Line 119: | Line 118: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | <p style=" line-height : 1.5em"> | ||
- | Repeat of the flocculation test for the characterization of OmpR234.<br> | + | Repeat of the <b>flocculation test</b> for the characterization of OmpR234.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Repeat of the CFA medium test. | + | Repeat of the <b>CFA medium test</b>. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 13:11, 13 September 2011
Week 8
From Monday the 1st of August to Friday the 5th of August 2011
Monday
24 well plate with LB/2 or M63 medium to test bacterial adherence in response to cobalt :
positive control with an adherent strain PHL818 ( MG1655 malT::Tn10 adr101=OmpR234 ), negative control with a non adherent strain NM522, and our synthesized part Rcn-CsgBAEFG (Amp) with increasing concentrations of cobalt ( in CoCl2 form).
Flocculation test for the same strains with LB/2 or M63 medium.
Miniprep of the transformed colonies with the following plasmids : Prcn / Pcurli-GFP / Pcurli - Operon curli.
-> none of the isolated clones had the Prcn or Pcurli-GFP plasmid, start of liquid culture of new clones.
-> two clones had the Pcurli-curli operon part : storage in the collection
Tuesday
In LB/2, the flocculation tests show flocculation for the adherent strain (PHL818), none for the negative control. Our strain shows a small flocculation that increases with the concentration in cobalt.
No flocculation in M63 medium for our strain : LB/2 will be used only for the next tests.
New flocculation tests with a wider range of cobalt concentration in LB or LB/2 and using the Rcn-CsgBAEFG (Cm) synthesized part
Revealing of the 24 well plate from the previous day, using 2 different methods : methyl violet (to visualise the formation of the biofilm at the surface of the well ) or direct OD600 measure.
Miniprep of the clones started the previous day
-> two clones have the Prcn part and one Pcurli-GFP.
Wednesday
Measurement of the OD600 of the LB/2 plate, which gives an adherence percentage for each strain.
Revealing of the M63 medium 24 well plate using the methyl violet ( 1 well) or OD600 method ( 3 wells ).
The flocculation tests from the previous day give better results in LB/2 compared to LB , but they're not significative. We'll use LB/2 for future tests.
Nanodrop quantification of some plasmids in the collection.
Thursday
Start of new 24 well plates, to study:
- the effect of cobalt (in increasing concentration),
- the difference between Amp or Cm strains, -> it works better in Amp
- the effect of the presence of antibiotic, -> it works better with Antibiotic
- the effect of prior treatment of the plate with EDTA, -> it is better when plate is rinse
- the effect of EDTA (in increasing concentration) on the strain. -> no useful
Characterization of OmpR234 with a 24 well plate and a flocculation test.
Test in CFA medium to show the formation of biofilms by colouring them red using the following strains( 10µL each ) :
PHL818 (positive control),NM522 (negative control), and test bacteria containing 18A promoter ( alone without the coding part ),our synthesized parts (Amp or Cm)
Construction of Prcn-GFP(LVA).
Digestion of the plasmid with Prcn (S+P) = linearization -> error: the part goes out from the plasmid
-> use of other enzyme tubes, with the same results, same with a simple digestion -> our enzyme tubes are contaminated
digestion of the plasmid with strong RRB-GFP (X+P) -> OK
Friday
Repeat of the flocculation test for the characterization of OmpR234.
Repeat of the CFA medium test.