(Difference between revisions)
(Redesigning Kumamolisin to Have Higer Activity at Low pH)
Line 3: Line 3:
=Redesigning Kumamolisin to Have Higer Activity at Low pH=
=Redesigning Kumamolisin to Have Higer Activity at Low pH=
[[File:Foldit.png|500px|thumb|right|A Sample Mutation in Foldit Showing a Change from Glycine to Serine]]
[[File:Washington Foldit.png|500px|thumb|right|A Sample Mutation in Foldit Showing a Change from Glycine to Serine]]
==Using Foldit to Produce Mutations==
==Using Foldit to Produce Mutations==

Revision as of 20:26, 13 September 2011

Redesigning Kumamolisin to Have Higer Activity at Low pH

A Sample Mutation in Foldit Showing a Change from Glycine to Serine

Using Foldit to Produce Mutations

In order to create mutations from wild-type kumamolisin, we first loaded the enzyme structure into the protein editing game Foldit. Foldit allows the user to modify the way in which a protein folds by changing the amino acid sequence. Using Foldit, we modified the amino acid residues around the active site of kumamolisin which contained within it a Proline-Glutamine-Lysine-Proline (PQLP) motif found throughout the gliadin peptide of gluten. With the PQLP locked in place along with the key active site amino acid residues, mutations were made which stabilized PQLP within the active site. The purpose of stabilizing the PQLP motif within the active site was to both increase the activity of the enzyme and to increase specificity towards the PQLP amino acid sequence. The current best treatment, an enzyme called ScPEP, has specificity to PQLP, but low activity at low pH. Using this method, we produced several mutants at a time which could potentially increase the enzyme's proteolytic activity towards gliadin.

The Goal Was To Combine the Specificity of ScPEP (Red) with the pH Tolerance of Kumamolisin (Green) Into One Protein

Mutagenizing Kumamolisin

Producing ssDNA

Once we had obtained feasible mutants from the Foldit program, we ordered these mutations in oligonucleotide primers to be used in Kunkel Mutagenesis. Kunkel mutagenesis is a short and simple procedure, so it was ideal for producing many mutants at a time To perform the mutagenesis, we first transformed the plaasmid containing wild-type kumamolisin into chemically competent cells of Escherichia coli CJ236. These cells were then grown and harvested for their single stranded DNA (ssDNA). We then determined the concentration of the DNA using a nanodrop machine. This was done to ensure that the DNA was at a high enough concentration to be used for mutagenesis.

Kunkel Mutagenesis

Using ssDNA as a template, we annealed oligo nucleotides in a PCR block to increase specific binding. The primer was then extended on the ssDNA using T7 DNA polymerase. We then dialyzed the DNA to remove salts introduced in previous steps. We then added the DNA to cuvettes containing electrically competent E. coli BL21* cells. These cells were then pulsed with electricity to allow the uptake of the newly mutagenized DNA. After growing the cells for an hour in TB, we plated the cells on LB agar containing kanamycin.

Using a Whole Cell Lysate Assay to Test Feasability of Mutants

After the cells had been allowed to grow overnight, colonies were picked and used to inoculate a 96 well plate containing LB and kanamycin. This step allowed us to grow a representative amount of cells containing each mutation. After growing overnight at 37 degrees celcius cells from each well were transferred to another 96 well plate containing TB and kanamycin. These plates were incubated at 37 degrees celcius and later induced using IPTG. After induction, we incubated the plates at 18 degrees celcius overnight. We then lysed the cells and tested the supernatant for proteolytic activity towards PQLP in an assay which measured PQLP degradation over a period of 30 minutes. The assay was done at pH 4 in accordance with the assays done to test ScPEP according to the literature. The mutants were tested against wild-type kumamolisin and ScPEP, an enzyme currently used for the treatment of gluten intolerance via proteolysis. The assay we used was not highly accurate in terms of actual activity. However, what the assay allowed us to do was determine activity relative to our controls. This allowed us to determine which mutants were worth purifying to get more accurate activity data.

General Overview of the Whole Cell Lysate

Testing Purified Mutants to Accurately Assess Activity


After compiling a set of mutants which showed a relative increase in activity we proceeded to purify our mutant proteins. This step is crucial because it allows us to determine how our mutant compares with the wild-type on a quantitative level. For instance, if the whole cell lysate assay showed one mutant to have ten times the activity level as wild-type kumamolisin we cannot assume that there has been an increase in activity because there could simply be ten times the amount of protein with the same level of activity. To purify our mutants, we first grew them in TB and kanamycin with a single colony of the mutant. This inoculation was grown over 24 hours at 37 degrees celcius and then expanded to 50 mililiters (TB+kanamycin). We then allowed the culture to grow to a specific optical density of cells before inducing the culture using IPTG. We then allowed the cells to grow again to express kumamolisin. We then lysed the cells using a lysis buffer and centrifugation. This allowed the enzymes to be released from the cells. The proteins were then collected on a column, washed with buffer, and eluted off the column. Finally, wwe dialyzed the protein in a sodium acetate buffer (pH 4).


Once we had pure protein, we determined the concentration of each using a NanoDrop machine. With the concentration of each, we then diluted the proteins to the same concentration. For the assay, we also used purified wild-type kumamolisin and ScPEP. The assay was again run for 30 minutes at pH 4. Using the data from the purified assays, we were able to deermine which mutants had higher activity than kumamolisin and by how much their activity was greater.