Team:EPF-Lausanne/Notebook/June2011

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Friday, 10 June 2011)
Line 165: Line 165:
     TATGAGAACGACCTATAAAAATGACCCGTGCTCTTCTGATTTTGAATGTATAGAGCGAGGCGCGGAGANNNCACAN
     TATGAGAACGACCTATAAAAATGACCCGTGCTCTTCTGATTTTGAATGTATAGAGCGAGGCGCGGAGANNNCACAN
 +
 +
== Tuesday, 21 June 2010 ==
 +
 +
With help from Henrike, Douglas checked the mistakes in the K112808 (lysis cassette) sequence. On the entire sequence, only 7 errors occurred in several reactions, and are therefore likely to be actual errors in the DNA. They occur in positions (with regard to the original sequence in the registry):
 +
 +
* '''70''': CTC codon substituded for CTA. Both code for ''leu'', so that position is still valid
 +
 +
The following are missing bases:
 +
 +
* '''677''' and '''684''': lie in the junction between sub-bricks K112805 and K112806. Still valid.
 +
* '''1199''': lies in the junction between K112806 and B0010. Still valid.
 +
* '''1387''': second base of K112807, in the non-coding region. Still valid.
 +
* '''1698''': lies in the junction between K112807 and B0010. Still valid.
 +
* '''1701''': beginning of B0010, in the non-coding region. Still valid.
 +
 +
In conclusion, there is one codon substitution, and six missing bases that all lie within the junction between two bricks or the non-coding region of a brick. Experimentally, the brick does lyse cells in culture. Therefore, the sequence appears valid.
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}

Revision as of 12:04, 21 June 2011