Team:EPF-Lausanne/Notebook/June2011

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Monday, 27 June 2011)
Line 184: Line 184:
== Monday, 27 June 2011 ==
== Monday, 27 June 2011 ==
-
We practised MITOMI with TetR linear template and random DNA sequence + target DNA sequence. We ferformed ITT (in virto transcription translation) on TetR linear template before adding it to the chip. However, the results are disappointing: we have more DNA binding for the random sequence (1000 RFU) than for the target sequence (500 RFU)...
+
We practised MITOMI with TetR linear template and random DNA sequence + target DNA sequence. We performed ITT (in vitro transcription/translation) on TetR linear template before adding it to the chip. However, the results are disappointing: we have more DNA binding for the random sequence (1000 RFU change) than for the target sequence (500 RFU)...
Perhaps the ITT doesn't yield a functional TetR, or we didn't have the optimal concentration of binding DNA (too much nonspecific interactions?). We'll definitely continue the MITOMI practise to find out.
Perhaps the ITT doesn't yield a functional TetR, or we didn't have the optimal concentration of binding DNA (too much nonspecific interactions?). We'll definitely continue the MITOMI practise to find out.
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Templates/Footer}}

Revision as of 06:35, 30 June 2011