Team:Wageningen UR/Safety/Five

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Biosafety and biosecurity considerations)
(→Biosafety and biosecurity considerations)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
} <!-- why is the safety button still not green? -->
} <!-- why is the safety button still not green? -->
-
ul li a.currentlinksafety2 {
+
ul li a.currentlinksafety7 {
color: black !important;
color: black !important;
}
}
Line 16: Line 16:
}
}
-
ul li a.currentlinksafety2 {
 
-
color: black !important;
 
-
}
 
</style>
</style>
Line 35: Line 32:
-
On itself, the cell chassis that is used is not considered to be dangerous to human beings. Despite the involved BioBrick systems of our project, the chassis is not pathogenic or harm full. If a person or organization with really bad intentions needs a living toxin producing system, our BioBrick systems would be very inefficient; an oscillating biological weapon doesn’t sound very effective. The biological terrorist (organisation) would have wanted all cells of the fungus producing a toxin, so it would be useless if the cells would make it one by one, in the prolongation of a hypha. Because of the above reasons we think our BioBrick system is reasonably secure.  
+
In itself, the cell chassis that is used is not considered to be dangerous to human beings. Despite the involved BioBrick system of our project, the chassis that we use is not pathogenic or harmful. If a person or organization with malicious intent was in need of a living toxin producing system, our BioBrick system would be very inefficient. That is, the toxin gene would be expressed with fluctuations. It seems highly unlikely that the system or any of its components could be weaponized. Because of these reasons we think our BioBrick system is reasonably secure.  
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:53, 21 September 2011

Building a Synchronized Oscillatory System

Biosafety and biosecurity considerations

Would the materials used in your project and/or your final product pose risks to security through malicious misuse by individuals, groups or states?

In itself, the cell chassis that is used is not considered to be dangerous to human beings. Despite the involved BioBrick system of our project, the chassis that we use is not pathogenic or harmful. If a person or organization with malicious intent was in need of a living toxin producing system, our BioBrick system would be very inefficient. That is, the toxin gene would be expressed with fluctuations. It seems highly unlikely that the system or any of its components could be weaponized. Because of these reasons we think our BioBrick system is reasonably secure.

Retrieved from "http://2011.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/Safety/Five"