Team:Calgary/Notebook/Calendar/Week1

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 65: Line 65:
     <div class="mainbody">
     <div class="mainbody">
-
       <span id="bodytitle"><h1>Week One</h1></span>
+
       <span id="bodytitle"><h1>Entry #1: May 6, 2011</h1></span>
<p> This week we mainly worked on defining the scope and objectives of the iGEM project.  As a group, we had already decided that we wanted to focus on an issue concerning tailing ponds; our discussion of tailing ponds centered around environmental reclamation and three central issues around it: fine particles, naphthenic acids, and problematic byproducts of microbial respiration. </p>
<p> This week we mainly worked on defining the scope and objectives of the iGEM project.  As a group, we had already decided that we wanted to focus on an issue concerning tailing ponds; our discussion of tailing ponds centered around environmental reclamation and three central issues around it: fine particles, naphthenic acids, and problematic byproducts of microbial respiration. </p>

Revision as of 15:48, 8 June 2011

Entry #1: May 6, 2011

This week we mainly worked on defining the scope and objectives of the iGEM project. As a group, we had already decided that we wanted to focus on an issue concerning tailing ponds; our discussion of tailing ponds centered around environmental reclamation and three central issues around it: fine particles, naphthenic acids, and problematic byproducts of microbial respiration.


Fine particles are small, lightweight particles (such as silt) which take on the order of hundreds of years to settle fully within tailing ponds. Fine particles matter because tailing ponds can only be reclaimed by the environment after enough material has "packed" to the bottom of the pond, meaning that reclamation is indefinitely postponed by fine particles.


Naphthenic acids, on the other hand, are a largely inclusive group of acids which contribute to the toxicity of nearby soil and groundwater; naphthenic acids are toxic to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife, and postpone the development of healthy ecosystems after reclamation.


Lastly, the tailing ponds are home to a variety of aerobic and anaerobic organisms, the latter of which consists of methanogens and sulfur-reducing bacteria. Potentially, both bacteria produce greenhouse gases; immprovements could be made to the ratio of bacteria (they are competive species), and on whether they can contribute to naphthenic acid degradation.


Five ideas bubbled up from our discussion of solving these two issues. To handle densification, we considered building a biofilm for filtration purposes, and engineering a bacteria to assist in particle-densification itself. To handle naphthenic acids, we considered naphthenic acid degradation and sensing. A final idea was to devise a way of manipulating the number of methanogens/sulfanogens in the tailing ponds to minimize harmful byproducts.


The group unanimously settled on building a biosensor for naphthenic acids, and started to read previous literature on the field. Upon reaching this consensus, work began on a research application to secure more funds for the summer research. The rough draft of the application was written by the students, which was finished on Friday.