"
Human Practices
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Human Practices) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Human Practices=== | ===Human Practices=== | ||
| - | '''1. Our team will be competing for the award on “Best Advance in Human Practices.” Would iGEM please provide examples of good human practices work?'' | + | '''1. Our team will be competing for the award on “Best Advance in Human Practices.” Would iGEM please provide examples of good human practices work?''' |
* Answer: iGEM has recognized a wide range of human practices work through formal awards and informal shout outs. In 2009 and 2010, awards went to Imperial College of London for projects that integrated systematic analysis of risks and risk perception with technical work to address risks through re-design of organisms; and to the University of Paris for anthropological work that fostered team engagement with ethical issues. In 2009, shout outs went to PKU Beijing’s DIYB research including a study on delivery of biological materials to home addresses in Beijing; Valencia’s portfolio of foundational work challenging assumptions in human practices; Edinburgh’s multifaceted review of risks and regulations in the EU and US. In 2010, shout outs went to Art Sciences Bangalore’s artistic exploration of an ecology in which synthetic and wild-type organisms interact; Weimar-Heidelberg Arts imaginative trip to a synthetic supermarket of the future; and TU Delft’s treatment of gene ownership and patenting. Many other iGEM teams also deserved praise for imaginative and accomplished work on human practices. | * Answer: iGEM has recognized a wide range of human practices work through formal awards and informal shout outs. In 2009 and 2010, awards went to Imperial College of London for projects that integrated systematic analysis of risks and risk perception with technical work to address risks through re-design of organisms; and to the University of Paris for anthropological work that fostered team engagement with ethical issues. In 2009, shout outs went to PKU Beijing’s DIYB research including a study on delivery of biological materials to home addresses in Beijing; Valencia’s portfolio of foundational work challenging assumptions in human practices; Edinburgh’s multifaceted review of risks and regulations in the EU and US. In 2010, shout outs went to Art Sciences Bangalore’s artistic exploration of an ecology in which synthetic and wild-type organisms interact; Weimar-Heidelberg Arts imaginative trip to a synthetic supermarket of the future; and TU Delft’s treatment of gene ownership and patenting. Many other iGEM teams also deserved praise for imaginative and accomplished work on human practices. | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 21 July 2011
Placeholder page for information regarding human practices and iGEM. This page is under construction and subject to revision at any time. Anything on this page should not be considered official. Please see the judging criteria and FAQs for further information.
Page Contributors
- Megan Palmer
- Sara Aguiton
- Jane Calvert
- Emma Frow
Proposed New Section for FAQs
Human Practices
1. Our team will be competing for the award on “Best Advance in Human Practices.” Would iGEM please provide examples of good human practices work?
- Answer: iGEM has recognized a wide range of human practices work through formal awards and informal shout outs. In 2009 and 2010, awards went to Imperial College of London for projects that integrated systematic analysis of risks and risk perception with technical work to address risks through re-design of organisms; and to the University of Paris for anthropological work that fostered team engagement with ethical issues. In 2009, shout outs went to PKU Beijing’s DIYB research including a study on delivery of biological materials to home addresses in Beijing; Valencia’s portfolio of foundational work challenging assumptions in human practices; Edinburgh’s multifaceted review of risks and regulations in the EU and US. In 2010, shout outs went to Art Sciences Bangalore’s artistic exploration of an ecology in which synthetic and wild-type organisms interact; Weimar-Heidelberg Arts imaginative trip to a synthetic supermarket of the future; and TU Delft’s treatment of gene ownership and patenting. Many other iGEM teams also deserved praise for imaginative and accomplished work on human practices.
2. What questions should teams bear in mind in their approach to Human Practices within their project?
- Below are some examples of questions that your team might reflect upon:
- How does it relate to your project?
- Why do you want to do it?
- Does it help us think about, and act differently in, the practice synthetic biology? How?
- How will you communicate this (on your wiki, in your presentation, to others etc)?
Potential Structure for Additional Information (i.e. leading to a more formal, complete page for future years)
- Introduction to Human Practices, situating it in broader HGP ELSI context but also talking about the differences from ELSI.
- Examples of good human practices projects (perhaps picked by former judges), covering a broad range of different projects with a couple of sentences maximum explaining why these projects are interesting and with a link to each wiki.
- Description of common pitfalls in the design of Human Practices projects (not naming any teams!)
- e.g. poorly-designed surveys (ask for help!)
