Team:Wisconsin-Madison/biobrick

From 2011.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 214: Line 214:
<table border="0" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0"><tr><td>
<table border="0" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0"><tr><td>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/d/d4/Clones.png" width = "360" align="right"/>
+
<img src="http://www.toreuse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tecan-2.jpg"/ align="right" width="350">
<strong><font size="3">
<strong><font size="3">
-
Biobricks
+
Ethanol Sensor
</font></strong><p>
</font></strong><p>
-
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut auctor orci odio. Pellentesque vitae velit enim. Vestibulum aliquet arcu sit amet lorem sodales aliquet venenatis tellus consequat. Nunc a nunc leo. Nam ac odio et lorem pretium cursus. Proin auctor justo at dolor pharetra malesuada. Fusce posuere orci auctor elit commodo euismod. Donec gravida sem ut augue eleifend commodo. Suspendisse orci ante, porttitor quis faucibus vel, gravida auctor nunc. Donec risus neque, malesuada eget ullamcorper non, aliquam in metus. Nulla in libero ante, ut laoreet metus. Pellentesque interdum urna leo. Nulla dapibus enim eu quam pellentesque ut venenatis eros interdum. Quisque ullamcorper sapien vitae lacus convallis molestie. Phasellus convallis fermentum semper. Proin fermentum iaculis felis, eu tristique urna consectetur et. Proin bibendum nisi ut dui rhoncus lacinia. Suspendisse ipsum erat, viverra ut consectetur sed, venenatis a lacus. Phasellus odio lacus, tempor sit amet lobortis a, vestibulum vel ante.
+
The primary source of results thus far has been a plate reader. This is a device which can record the optical density (OD – a measure of cell concentration) as well as the fluorescence of up to 96 cultures at once. Ideally, we hope to produce such a robust fluorescent response as to not need the plate reader for qualitative assessments.
-
<p>
+
<p><br>
-
Proin non leo nibh, in bibendum neque. Suspendisse rutrum nisi eu nunc luctus ac rutrum enim commodo. Nullam volutpat ultricies luctus. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Sed nec dolor mi. Nunc scelerisque porttitor justo, ac elementum nibh viverra a. Nulla neque mauris, ultrices non faucibus ac, condimentum ac mi. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Maecenas porttitor dictum pharetra. Morbi imperdiet placerat lobortis.
+
This graph shows the fluorescent response of cell cultures containing two plasmids: pBAD33bb: exaDE and PexaA: TagRFP in pSB1A2 (pEtRv2.1). The fluorescence of the system at varying ethanol concentrations was normalized to the optical density of their respective cell culture. The cells’ fluorescence was measured over a range of ethanol concentrations from 0%-5% EtOH. This ethanol sensing system is “turned on” or induced in the presence of arabinose by the PBAD promoter. The blue data points on the graph represent the fluorescence of cell cultures without any arabinose and therefore the ethanol sensor is uninduced; the red data points represent the fluorescent response of the induced system in the presence of .2% arabinose.  
 +
<p><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/00/Pets_2.1_graph.jpg" align="left" width="500">
 +
From the graph, it can be seen that there is an increase in fluorescence between the induced and uninduced system. This is the result that was expected, however, there isn’t a large difference in fluorescence between the two systems. To further increase this difference in fluorescence, we intend to decrease the “leakiness” of our promoter through directed evolution.  Additionally, the graph shows a positive correlation between fluorescence and ethanol concentration; therefore, our ethanol sensor exhibits a linear response in fluorescent intensity with varying ethanol concentrations. The magnitude of the slope of the data points represents the degree of our systems response. Currently, the slope of the data is smaller than desired. This will  also be the target of a directed evolution upon the ethanol sensor.
-
<p><br> <p>
 
-
 
-
Read more about: <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Wisconsin-Madison/registry">registry</a>, <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Wisconsin-Madison/cutsites">cut sites</a>.
 
-
 
-
<p><br>
 
-
<font size="1"><i>Image source: sdfsdfsdfsdfdsf</font></i>
 

Revision as of 19:51, 9 August 2011









Project >> Overview, Ethanol Sensor, Alkane Sensor, Microcompartment

Ethanol Sensor

The primary source of results thus far has been a plate reader. This is a device which can record the optical density (OD – a measure of cell concentration) as well as the fluorescence of up to 96 cultures at once. Ideally, we hope to produce such a robust fluorescent response as to not need the plate reader for qualitative assessments.


This graph shows the fluorescent response of cell cultures containing two plasmids: pBAD33bb: exaDE and PexaA: TagRFP in pSB1A2 (pEtRv2.1). The fluorescence of the system at varying ethanol concentrations was normalized to the optical density of their respective cell culture. The cells’ fluorescence was measured over a range of ethanol concentrations from 0%-5% EtOH. This ethanol sensing system is “turned on” or induced in the presence of arabinose by the PBAD promoter. The blue data points on the graph represent the fluorescence of cell cultures without any arabinose and therefore the ethanol sensor is uninduced; the red data points represent the fluorescent response of the induced system in the presence of .2% arabinose.


From the graph, it can be seen that there is an increase in fluorescence between the induced and uninduced system. This is the result that was expected, however, there isn’t a large difference in fluorescence between the two systems. To further increase this difference in fluorescence, we intend to decrease the “leakiness” of our promoter through directed evolution. Additionally, the graph shows a positive correlation between fluorescence and ethanol concentration; therefore, our ethanol sensor exhibits a linear response in fluorescent intensity with varying ethanol concentrations. The magnitude of the slope of the data points represents the degree of our systems response. Currently, the slope of the data is smaller than desired. This will also be the target of a directed evolution upon the ethanol sensor.