"
Team:UC Davis/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Prototype team page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{Team:UC_Davis/Head}} | |
<html> | <html> | ||
| - | + | '''Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?''' | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping everything contained in lab. Also, all of our parts contain antibiotic resistance plasmids, so the likelihood that foreign strains grow unintentionally is reduced. | |
| + | '''Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?''' | ||
| + | None of the parts or devices we have made raise any safety issues. We are simply manipulating existing low-risk parts which should not raise any safety risks. | ||
| - | + | '''Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?''' | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | Yes, there is a biosafety group here at UC Davis. Our lab is inspected and has passed the safety tests each time. They are supportive of our project and recognize that this lab operates safely and responsibly. | |
| - | + | '''Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | We think that accountability and responsible engineering are key when designing a safe and effective system. Thorough testing and a good understanding of what you have made also can help to ensure that labs are producing safe products. Other ideas such as adding a barcode or some sort of signature can also be a viable means to maintaining a reasonable amount of safety however, attention must be paid to the specific sequence so as to not affect the function of the part. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 2 August 2011
Our Sponsors
Start a Family
Got a favorite BioBrick? Check our our process for expanding basic parts into part families.Criteria
View our judging criteria for iGEM 2011 here.'''Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?''' Our project raises few biological safety concerns with regard to researcher, public, or environmental safety. We are using standard parts from the registry which have been used by many teams and research labs, are included in the distribution every year and are known to be safe. We minimize the risk of public and environmental hazards by keeping everything contained in lab. Also, all of our parts contain antibiotic resistance plasmids, so the likelihood that foreign strains grow unintentionally is reduced. '''Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?''' None of the parts or devices we have made raise any safety issues. We are simply manipulating existing low-risk parts which should not raise any safety risks. '''Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?''' Yes, there is a biosafety group here at UC Davis. Our lab is inspected and has passed the safety tests each time. They are supportive of our project and recognize that this lab operates safely and responsibly. '''Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' We think that accountability and responsible engineering are key when designing a safe and effective system. Thorough testing and a good understanding of what you have made also can help to ensure that labs are producing safe products. Other ideas such as adding a barcode or some sort of signature can also be a viable means to maintaining a reasonable amount of safety however, attention must be paid to the specific sequence so as to not affect the function of the part.
