"
Team:UTP-Panama/Safety
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Safety Issues) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
; 4- Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' | ; 4- Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?''' | ||
| + | ==== | ||
We are consulting some people to be sure about some issues. | We are consulting some people to be sure about some issues. | ||
| - | + | ==== | |
| + | |||
== Safety Issues == | == Safety Issues == | ||
| - | ;For Researcher: | + | ;1-For Researcher: |
Like our project is based in using the BioBricks to engineered devices, we have not new safety issues in our project to the researchers. | Like our project is based in using the BioBricks to engineered devices, we have not new safety issues in our project to the researchers. | ||
| + | ;For Environment: | ||
| - | ;About Devices: | + | ;2-About Devices: |
| - | ;About Biosafety Groups | + | ;3- About Biosafety Groups |
| - | Our University doesn't have a biosafety group. But with the emmergence of synthetic biology the logic next step it should be to develop it in order to fix limits in experimental project and make aware students and professors. | + | Our University doesn't have a biosafety group, mainly because we doesn't have a biological & life sciences schools in our university. |
| + | But with the emmergence of synthetic biology the logic next step it should be to develop it in order to fix limits in experimental project and make aware students and professors. | ||
In Panama, synthetic biology doesn't have its own rules but should follow the ones of the bioethic and the GMO. | In Panama, synthetic biology doesn't have its own rules but should follow the ones of the bioethic and the GMO. | ||
Revision as of 05:52, 15 July 2011
- 1- Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of
- researcher safety,
- public safety, or
- environmental safety?
- 2- Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
- did you document these issues in the Registry?
- how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
- How could other teams learn from your experience?
- 3- Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
- If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
- If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
- 4- Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
Contents |
==
We are consulting some people to be sure about some issues.
==
Safety Issues
- 1-For Researcher
Like our project is based in using the BioBricks to engineered devices, we have not new safety issues in our project to the researchers.
- For Environment
- 2-About Devices
- 3- About Biosafety Groups
Our University doesn't have a biosafety group, mainly because we doesn't have a biological & life sciences schools in our university. But with the emmergence of synthetic biology the logic next step it should be to develop it in order to fix limits in experimental project and make aware students and professors. In Panama, synthetic biology doesn't have its own rules but should follow the ones of the bioethic and the GMO.
| Team Example |
| Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
Safety
Please use this page to answer the safety questions posed on the safety page.
