Assay Method and Results

1. Characterization of rocF and Arg box

1.1 Materials

Expression plasmids used in this study are shown in Table 1.

1.2 Methods

1.2.1 Preparation of samples for urea concentration assay

1. A single colony of cells transformed with engineered plasmids (mock, rocF or rocF+Arg box) was inoculated into 3 mL of LB with appropriate antibiotics and grown to saturation at 37°C.
2. The saturated culture was diluted 50-fold, grown till the log phase (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5).
3. The culture was induced with 1 mM IPTG at 37°C for 1 hour.
4. 1.5 mL of culture was centrifuged at 9,000 rpm for 1 minute and the supernatant fluid was used as a sample for urea concentration assay.

1.2.2 Urea concentration assay

Urea concentrations of the samples were determined colorimetrically with DIUR-500 -QuantiChrom™ Urea Assay Kit obtained from BioAssay Systems.
Detailed methods are as follows.

1. 10 µL of the supernatant fluid from each sample, 10 µL blank(LB),and 10 µL standard (10 mg/dL urea LB) were transferred to wells of clear bottom 96-well plates.
2. 200 µL working reagent for coloring reaction from DIUR-500 -QuantiChrom™ Urea Assay Kit was added and the wells were taped lightly to mix.
3. The mixture was incubated for 20 munites at room temperature.
4. Optical density at 450 nm was read and urea concentration (mg/dL) of the sample was calculated as
   .
   ODSAMPLE, ODBLANK and ODSTANDARD are OD₄₅₀ values of sample, standard and blank, respectively.

Linear plot of OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion

To test linearlity between OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 7.5, 10 mg/dL urea LB were assayed in triplicate with this urea assay kit in the same way as our bacterial samples. Plot of OD₄₅₀ values vs. urea concentraions we tested showed very good linearlity as shown in Fig. 1

fig. 1 Linear plot of OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion

1.3 Results

Each sample was assayed in duplicate urea concentration detected in each sample is shown in Table 2. fig. 2 shows the average of these 2 values.

fig. 2 The average of concentration values detected in duplicate

2. Characterization of Ptrc-RBS-rocF-Argbox

2.1 Materials

Expression plasmids used in this study are listed in table 1.

In one experiment, MG1655 (argR +) and JE6852 (argR -) were respectively transformed with either mock(3K3), rocF(3K3) or rocF-Arg box(3K3). In another experiment, MG1655 (argR +) and JD24293 (argR -) were respectively transformed with either mock(6A1), rocF(6A1) or rocF-Arg box(6A1). Both JE6852 and JD24293 were obtained from National Institute of Genetics.

2.2 Methods

2.2.1 Preparation of samples for urea concentration assay

1. A single colony of cells transformed with engineered plasmids (mock, rocF or rocF+Arg box) was inoculated into 3 mL of LB with appropriate antibiotics and grown to saturation at 37°C.
2. The saturated culture was diluted 50-fold, grown till the log phase (OD₆₀₀ = 0.5).
3. The culture was induced with 1 mM IPTG at 37°C for 1 hour.
4. 1.5 mL of culture was centrifuged at 9,000 rpm for 1 minute and the supernatant fluid was used as a sample for urea concentration assay.

2.2.2 Urea concentration assay

Urea concentrations of the samples were determined colorimetrically with DIUR-500 -QuantiChrom™ Urea Assay Kit obtained from BioAssay Systems.
Detailed methods are as follows.

1. 10 µL of the supernatant fluid from each sample, 10 µL blank(LB),and 10 µL standard (10 mg/dL urea LB) were transferred to wells of clear bottom 96-well plates.
2. 200 µL working reagent for coloring reaction from DIUR-500 -QuantiChrom™ Urea Assay Kit was added and the wells were taped lightly to mix.
3. The mixture was incubated for 20 munites at room temperature.
4. Optical density at 450 nm was read and urea concentration (mg/dL) of the sample was calculated as
   .
   ODSAMPLE, ODBLANK and ODSTANDARD are OD₄₅₀ values of sample, standard and blank, respectively.

Linear plot of OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion

To test linearlity between OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 7.5, 10 mg/dL urea LB were assayed in triplicate with this urea assay kit in the same way as our bacterial samples. Plot of OD₄₅₀ values vs. urea concentraions we tested showed very good linearlity as shown in Fig. 1.

fig. 3 Linear plot of OD₄₅₀ vs. urea concentraion

2.3 Results

fig. 4 Urea concentration detected in bacterial samples on pSB3K3

fig. 5 Urea concentration detected in bacterial samples on pSB6A1

Similar results were obtained in both the experiment with samples on pSB3K3 and the experiment with samples on pSB6A1. In MG1655(argR +), addition of Trc promoter-rocF led to production of more urea compared to mock as expected. These results show that insertion of rocF resulted in arginase production, therefore completing the urea cycle in E. coli. In the same strain, however, addition of Arg box sequence led to little change in urea production. The reason why the effect of Arg boxes was not apparent is probably that both pSB3K3 and pSB6A1 are low-copy-number plasmids. Low-copy-number plasmids are not capable of introducing enough number of Arg boxes to effectively deactivate the arginine repressor. Both of the plasmids containing rocF gene in the strains with argR(a gene which codes arginine repressor) loss-of-function mutant produce urea more efficiently than those in MG1655(argR +).

These results are in line with the fact that for strains with argR loss-of-function mutant, deactivation of arginine repressor by Arg boxes is not needed and addition of the Arg box does not result in a significant increase of urea production.