Team:UC Davis/PromoterFamilies
From 2011.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Aheuckroth (Talk | contribs) |
Aheuckroth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="floatbox"> | ||
+ | <h1>λ cI</h1> | ||
+ | <div class="floatbox3"> | ||
+ | <a href="http://vimeo.com/29301077"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/29301077?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" align="left" style="margin-right:15px" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen></iframe></a> | ||
+ | This promoter/repressor pair originates from Lambda phage. Employing either a lytic or lysogenic life cycle, this bacteriophage infects its E. coli host with double stranded DNA. cI binds at OR1, OR2 and OR3 sites with preference given to the OR1 site. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="floatbox"> | ||
+ | <div class="floatbox2"> | ||
+ | <h2>Construct</h2> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K611017"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/a/a5/UCD_R51mut_construct.png"> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="floatbox"> | ||
+ | <div class="floatbox2"> | ||
+ | <h2>Mutant Screening</h2> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <a href="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6014/6190729685_171b292c18_b.jpg"><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6014/6190729685_171b292c18_b.jpg" width="400" height="212"></a> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | We selected mutants by first visually picking colonies from transformation plates. From there we used our plate reader to read the GFP fluorescence of each mutant on a 96 well screening plate. In the graph above, the green bars represent mutant expression that is 1.5 standard deviations from the average wildtype fluorescence. Many of our mutants show very low to no expression which indicates that the error-prone pcr which produced them was notably mutagenic. We found 9 suitable candidates to further characterize using the process outlined in the <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Data"> Data page.</a> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 18:37, 22 October 2011
Start a Family
Got a favorite BioBrick? Check our our process for expanding basic parts into part families.Criteria
View our judging criteria for iGEM 2011 here.
Repressible Promoter Families
The activity of repressible promoters can be modulated through the expression repressor proteins, chemical induction, and other factors. We chose to expand the LacI, TetR and Lambda c1 BioBrick promoters into part families to offer synthetic biologists a broader selection of repressible promoters from which to build genetic circuits.
LacI
The lac repressor is responsible for regulating the metabolism of lactose. In the absence of lactose, LacI forms a tetramer with identical subunits which appears as two dimers. Each dimer binds in the major groove of the DNA binding region which subsequently blocks the RNA polymerase from binding. In nature, allolactose will bind the repressor leading to transcription of the lac operon. Using IPTG as an inducer has the same effect as allolactose.
To the left is a small render of the LacI tetramer bound to its operator.
Mutant Screening
The above graph shows our initial mutants. We picked 87 potential mutants from transformation plates and ran them in our plate reader to quantitatively measure fluorescence. The green bars represent variants that are at least 1.5 standard deviations from the average wildtype expression level.
DNA Sequences
The sequences above show our 7 LacI mutants. There are between 1 and 7 mutations in each sequence as indicated by the red bases. All 7 sequences have mutations between bases 100 and 200 which contain the known locations of the CAP binding site(bases 88-127) and LacI binding site (bases 166-200). Read more about our mutants on their Parts Registry pages.