Team:Peking R/Project/RNAToolkit
From 2011.igem.org
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td height="28" align="left"> </td> | <td height="28" align="left"> </td> | ||
- | <td align="left" class="TPP"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking_R/Project/RNAToolkit2">THEOPHYLINE</a> responsive | + | <td align="left" class="TPP"><a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking_R/Project/RNAToolkit2">THEOPHYLINE</a> responsive riboswitch</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 00:02, 6 October 2011
Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking R/bannerhidden Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking R/back2 Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking R/Projectbackground
Brief introduction to RNA toolkit
click the RNA Controllers' name to learn more
In recent years, RNA devices have emerged as powerful tools to regulate gene expression in vivo, and particularly, ligand-responsive riboswitches/ribozymes enable us to manipulate translation strength of specific genes upon different concentrations of ligands. Ligand-responsive riboswitches/ribozymes regulate the translation rate of downstream gene by changing conformations, cleaving or splicing upon external addition of ligand. Compared with transcriptional and post-translational regulation, riboswitches/ribozymes function through allostery of RNA structure, which requires little or no assistance from proteins, so the regulation mechanism is relatively simpler and their functions are more decoupled from native biological activities.
In order to fulfill the goal of establishing an extensible and versatile platform for softcoding of genetic program, our team reached out to a great extent to search for available ligand-responsive riboswitches/ribozymes that meet our criteria and selected them into our RNA toolkit.
RNA controller candidates must meet two basic criteria: firstly, they should possess a relatively plain dose-response curve, which would allow for precise translation strength modulation within a wide range of ligand concentration; secondly, ligands they recognize should be genetically and biochemically orthogonal to the host cells, in our case, E.coli cells, as much as possible.
Two candidates emerged as promising RNA tools that satisfied our requirements: thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP)-responsive hammerhead ribozymes and theophylline-responsive riboswitches. By altering the upstream promoter and downstream coding sequence of the RNA controllers, we demonstrated that their performance was independent from sequence context, which proved the modularity of these RNA devices.
To further extend the range of application of our RNA toolkit, we created a ribozyme that functions with a different mechanism, which has an extreme low level of backgrounds. We substituted the aptamer domain of c-di-GMP group Iintron to theophylline-responsive aptamer, thus invented a group I intron that senses theophylline to perform splicing function.
Moreover, we introduced a general method to evolve hammerhead ribozyme that senses a new ligand. By coupling an adenine aptamer with hammerhead ribozyme and randomizing nucleotides in the linker domian, we evolved new hammerhead ribozymes through dual selection, whose self-cleavage could be regulated by adenine.
In summary, our project provided new design principles for rational or semi-rational design of riboswitches/ribozymes.
Existed Natural RNA Controllers | |
---|---|
TPP regulated hammerhead ribozyme | |
THEOPHYLINE responsive riboswitch | |
Engineered RNA controllers |
|
RIBOZYME:engineered group I intron with a theophylline hammerhead ribozyme | |
SELECTION:adenine hammerhead ribozyme obtained from screening |