"
Team:Peking S/project/project/wire/harvest
From 2011.igem.org
(→Harvesting ‘Chemical Wires’ From Nature) |
(→Harvesting ‘Chemical Wires’ From Nature) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''Introduction''' | '''Introduction''' | ||
| - | Multicellular strategy provides us a visa to construct a complex gene network. During gene network constructing, as genetic network scaling up, more cells are involved in compartmentalizing genetic network. Natural quorum sensing and small chemical molecule generator and receiver systems provide a potential platform for multicellular network construction. Unfortunately, naturally existing and well characterized cell-cell communication systems are far from sufficient. Thus， exploiting new systems is significantly important in multicellular network construction | + | Multicellular strategy provides us a visa to construct a complex gene network. During gene network constructing, as genetic network scaling up, more cells are involved in compartmentalizing genetic network. Natural quorum sensing and small chemical molecule generator and receiver systems provide a potential platform for multicellular network construction. Unfortunately, naturally existing and well characterized cell-cell communication systems are far from sufficient. Thus， exploiting new systems is significantly important in multicellular network construction using synthetic microbial consortia. |
In exploiting new systems many molecules could serve as candidates of synthetic consortia ‘chemical wire’, but not all of them perform well when applied to microbial chassis. One of the most significant problem is that they are difficult to be synthesized or perceived when chemical molecule generating or receiving mechanism is too complex to engineer. Besides, threshold, response time and coordination of receiver cell performance should also be considered in cell-cell communication system selection. Because only ‘chemical wire’ systems with low threshold, response speed and coordination response deserve to be converted into signaling-system-compartment. | In exploiting new systems many molecules could serve as candidates of synthetic consortia ‘chemical wire’, but not all of them perform well when applied to microbial chassis. One of the most significant problem is that they are difficult to be synthesized or perceived when chemical molecule generating or receiving mechanism is too complex to engineer. Besides, threshold, response time and coordination of receiver cell performance should also be considered in cell-cell communication system selection. Because only ‘chemical wire’ systems with low threshold, response speed and coordination response deserve to be converted into signaling-system-compartment. | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 5 October 2011
Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/bannerhidden Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/back2
Template:Https://2011.igem.org/Team:Peking S/bannerhidden
Chemical Wire Toolbox
Introduction|Harvesting ‘Chemical Wires’ From Nature|Synthesizing Quorum Sensing Inverters|Orthogonal Activating Matrix
Harvesting ‘Chemical Wires’ From Nature
Introduction
Multicellular strategy provides us a visa to construct a complex gene network. During gene network constructing, as genetic network scaling up, more cells are involved in compartmentalizing genetic network. Natural quorum sensing and small chemical molecule generator and receiver systems provide a potential platform for multicellular network construction. Unfortunately, naturally existing and well characterized cell-cell communication systems are far from sufficient. Thus， exploiting new systems is significantly important in multicellular network construction using synthetic microbial consortia.
In exploiting new systems many molecules could serve as candidates of synthetic consortia ‘chemical wire’, but not all of them perform well when applied to microbial chassis. One of the most significant problem is that they are difficult to be synthesized or perceived when chemical molecule generating or receiving mechanism is too complex to engineer. Besides, threshold, response time and coordination of receiver cell performance should also be considered in cell-cell communication system selection. Because only ‘chemical wire’ systems with low threshold, response speed and coordination response deserve to be converted into signaling-system-compartment. According to the selection principles above， in our project two signal generators and receiver systems are selected. One employs autoinducer N-(3-hydroxy-7-cis-tetradecenoyl)-L-homoserine lactone (3OH-C14:1-HSL), as the signal molecule (Figure 1). The other system employs Salicylate (Figure 2).In order to confirm their usability in practical application, we designed experiments covering three aspects of the systems, namely dose response, time dependence and coordination.
Cin system
This system derives from Rhizobium leguminosarum which are Gram-negative soil bacteria living in symbiotic association with legumes by forming nodules. In this system, cinI, pcin, cinR are the core elements involved in cin system. CinI is the synthase of 3OH-C14:1-HSL and cinR is the receptor of 3OH-C14:1-HSL. CinI is a typical LuxI-type synthase, and cinR is a LuxR-type transcriptional regulator. Pcin is activated by CinR binding with 3OH-C14:1-HSL.
